dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Classic Flight Announce Newquay Closure #868847
    richw_82
    Participant

    I was with the RAF yesterday and can safely say that the future of the Shackleton is uppermost in their minds.

    The words ‘Classic Air Force’ did not enter the conversation with that future.

    Baz

    I’m guessing neither did SPT crop up given the resounding silence from MOD and other parties regarding the old girl. Shame, given we’ve supplied parts, had more standing by, and have a fairly good idea how to look after a Shack.

    I guess some people just don’t want to be helped.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #873434
    richw_82
    Participant

    No news as yet on WL795. I’m told that there is something ‘imminent’ but not sure if thats results of the tender, or just more legal stuff.

    As a side note we’re also looking for a reduction gear oil seal (main one where the prop shafts come out of the reduction gearbox) as one has let go on WR963 in spectacular fashion. We don’t really want to rob one of our inhibited engines if at all possible, so if anyone has any leads on on or has one on the shelf please get in touch.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #874280
    richw_82
    Participant

    No problem Ian. As soon as your Dad’s feeling better, let us know and we’ll arrange to get him acquainted with WR963. It’ll be a Saturday though (at least until Airbase opens to the public again on May 2nd).

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #874704
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi Ian,

    Thanks for the compliments! The team work very hard to keep WR963 in the condition she is and lately have really been stepping things up as we push to return her to flight.

    To answer your questions, we don’t have any spare radomes. The original from WR963 was taken off and stored for a number of years, before it was scrapped in error in 2010 (our own fault). The airport was being cleaned up and we had some waste material to get rid of and the radome was kept close by. Confusion led to the ‘dome being scrapped along with the waste.

    We don’t intend to put one back on due to trying to return our aircraft to MR2 configuration, so although its a loss in the sense that it was something that we maybe could have passed on to another group or kept as a display item, it doesn’t impact what we are doing with the Shackleton or her future operation.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #894390
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi SADSACK,

    WR963 has never had a nosewheel, she has always been a variant of the Mk2 (MR, then AEW, now back towards MR).

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #897094
    richw_82
    Participant

    It is fantastic news, and Sil-Mid Ltd’s sponsorship has really helped things.

    For anyone that wants to visit, we’re on site this Saturday (21st Feb) from around 10am; and as always WR963 will be open.

    My updates will be taking a little hiatus after this weekend as I await the arrival of my baby boy; so you may all have to rely on Pete (hunterxf382) for news while I’m learning how to maintain a small person instead of a big aeroplane…

    Regards,

    Rich W

    in reply to: Dresden raid – 70 years on #901878
    richw_82
    Participant

    Whats done is done and we can’t change the past only learn from it.

    The German civilians helped the rise of the Nazi party, and in doing so partly determined their own fate. The German authorities hastened it by showing what could be done to a civilian target by concentrated area bombing in the Blitz.

    My personal feeling is that Dresden has become over the years a symbol of the horror of the bombing campaign, and it should be taken as just that – an example of the sheer cruelty of war. I will be taking a moment to remember those lost on the ground, and the horror of the attack they suffered. But I’ll also be remembering those that went out night after night to do their duty, and those that didn’t return.

    For those that debate the was it/wasn’t it a legitimate target, I can suggest the excellent book on Dresden by Frederick Taylor. It also suggests a true casualty toll, of around 6900.

    Regards,

    Rich W

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #909038
    richw_82
    Participant

    You are correct, WR963 was an AEW, and largely still is, though progress is being made to move back to MR2.

    We have the bottom section of the radome ‘dustbin’ and the intermediate section can be rebuilt from drawings we already hold. Most – if not all – of the required parts for MR2 Phase 3 configuration can be found or manufactured and will be fitted. There are some weight savings in redundant equipment to be made, but not anywhere that will be seen or be detrimental to the aircraft.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #909467
    richw_82
    Participant

    So… 2015 is here and what have we been up to? Well, we’ve mostly been hefting propellers about, and on a Shackleton there’s plenty of them to go around.

    Investigation into the No 4 prop oil leak revealed some issues that had long been hidden from years gone by; probably during her time as WL790’s propeller test bed. This included fitting a vital part that had either perished and been destroyed, or may have been overlooked when the prop was fitted – an O-ring that goes right next to the rear propellers rear cone. So with a team comprising of one ex-Shack engineer (camlobe), a rigger turned grollie (hunterxf382) and plenty of willing hands, the propellers from No 4 engine were removed, cleaned, and refitted.

    Then it was onto No 3. This propeller had a badly cracked backplate on the front propeller, fortunately we had a few spares in store.

    https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/10389016_10204320892477472_1362427720129237272_n.jpg?oh=637df3ba8e44eac53c23b32249509d35&oe=55669AF5

    https://scontent-b-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/10898318_10205534297581511_8386274124009816055_n.jpg?oh=597d4dd7c8b01f2eec272011d0e801fd&oe=554D121E

    With the team getting better at prop removals, this was the site that met visitors after an hour or so of us being on site…

    https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/q87/p180x540/1620564_911806805532743_7069421821961573012_n.jpg?oh=7cfaaf6c53eb03b2f5ceb10194f32c9e&oe=5550791B

    While it was off it allowed the cleaning of a lot of accumulated oil and grime. 24 years worth by the look of things inside this spinner shell.

    https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/q86/p180x540/1484219_911806842199406_6169686385124467508_n.jpg?oh=1812917bd0a1cb9ce74a1ff3378b54ab&oe=555A0C14

    We were also able to clean around the rear propeller and translation unit.

    https://scontent-b-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/p180x540/10943651_911806742199416_2834937288728042276_n.jpg?oh=e748e1cfe2648229ac5ddfafdf60edf9&oe=555481FD

    It seems trivial, but it helps massively with tracing any leaks if and when they happen. Once things were as they should be and with the new backplate fitted it was time to get the whole lot back together again.

    https://scontent-b-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/p180x540/10406408_911806628866094_2380252939249314842_n.jpg?oh=ea6f44922d8d5ff0c5f191ef491c84f2&oe=55627759

    All the other props are now being checked for similar issues, which has turned up some stiff/seized spinner latches, and and no other problems.

    Around the rest of the aircraft the ongoing saga of the hydraulic hand pump resulted in a second attempt at fixing it. We ended up fitting a brand new one, as the ex Elvington one kept things working long enough to get to the end of teh year, then suffered a similar failure to the last one meaning it wouldn’t pump fluid around the system. Despite it being funny to watch new volunteers trying to pump the bomb doors open with it, something had to be done and replacing it was the speediest way to solve the issue. Both old pumps are being rebuilt to provide a source of spares should we need them in the future.

    Fitting the new pump meant we could inspect the flap operating jack and if necessary replace it, as there has been a telltale weep of fluid from around that area.

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/p180x540/10897828_10204320894157514_3743113955401252643_n.jpg?oh=a7a5c9181eaee6e9ee81870a6247ebcd&oe=554C2A6C&__gda__=1431650963_7b197da8a88d21c9ddcba201551d6b14

    Thankfully the weep was nothing serious and the jack won’t have to be replaced. We did find that the rubber gaitors that take the flap operating tubes through to the wing have perished and fallen away though, so we’ll be back in here again at some point soon once replacements are found.

    The front bomb bay doors are now open, as we’re reviewing our options as to how best to reinstate these, and the way forwards is looking to be using the drawings and a significant amount of manufacturing new half ribs to fill the gap. Even with a chunk missing, the full length of the bomb door does look rather good, and eases the servicing of the throttle and pitch control systems.

    https://scontent-b-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/p180x540/10647045_911806662199424_1237393689071522436_n.jpg?oh=2305c3264064e3fe0fb5cece1835b7a8&oe=5558C0FF

    So thats the aircraft. Now what of her future?

    Well, in 2012 the Shackleton Preservation Trust announced the decision to attempt to return a Shackleton to the skies and since then most of what has been done since has been maintaining the aircraft in a ground running condition. Three weeks ago, things took a significant step fowards and following further discussions with Civilian Aviation Authorities, the green light has been given to proceed with the restoration to flight.

    As a consequence the way we have been doing work, recording it, and the way we will be doing things as we take things forward is under review to meet the requirements of the authorities. The majority of pieces in the puzzle are in place (hangarage arrangements, spares, tech documents and manuals etc, etc) and there is feverous activity happening behind the scenes in getting the word out and chasing up more support. This will hopefully allow us to make swifter progress towards our goal, and we’ll increase our efforts accordingly to step up the pace of work on the Shackleton herself.

    Regards,

    Rich W

    in reply to: Current status of the "Kee Bird" B-29 Superfortress #923742
    richw_82
    Participant

    i’d be tempted to do both. Kee Bird’s a hot topic to aviation enthusiasts, not many of them purchase National Geographic.

    in reply to: Current status of the "Kee Bird" B-29 Superfortress #923871
    richw_82
    Participant

    Michael,

    Contact Key Publishing, surely they would love to feature this? Flypast sells worldwide.

    in reply to: Current status of the "Kee Bird" B-29 Superfortress #924256
    richw_82
    Participant

    Michael, those photos and your video are fantastic! Thanks for posting them, and may we see more?

    The propellers aren’t the originals, the ones removed as seen on the documentary had blade cuffs at the root. Some (okay, a lot..) of the damage looks to be deliberate, and that was my thought with the bent prop blades. My guess is the bulldozer had a stab at what was left, and wind and erosion has done for the rest – including paint off the blades themselves.

    The site doesn’t look to have been cleaned up much.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: RAF 100 Years Plans? #924759
    richw_82
    Participant

    I realise that Mike, my point was for something like the US registered Harrier. Everything conforms to something somewhere – its just a matter of where and finding a way to get it accepted. There are civil owned aircraft working on military contracts, so maybe that would provide a way for something like a Harrier to participate. Or finding a way by which a foreign registered Permit aircraft could operate over here in a way that is satisfactory to the authorities. I doubt it will happen anyway, as not only are RAF/MOD extremely risk averse as you point out, it also costs more than they will want to spend.

    But its a nice little daydream..

    in reply to: RAF 100 Years Plans? #924792
    richw_82
    Participant

    I imagine where there’s a will there’s a way. A foreign registered aircraft flying on an exemption, a ferry permit, a military contract… anything, just a way to get it in the air and flying for the 100th anniversary. A Lightning flew over here once with the manufacturers backing – albeit a delivery flight; so its not like its unprecedented.

    in reply to: RAF 100 Years Plans? #924803
    richw_82
    Participant

    Cosford would be a good choice of place to hold it. The TSR2 being outdoors at this year’s show highlights what could be done – add to that as many flying examples of RAF aircraft as you can gather and you would have an incredible celebration for the centenary. For those that can’t fly (or be wangled onto some sort of temporary permit be it military or civilian to allow them to fly) get ground running or static examples to fill the gaps roaded in well in advance.

    Funding? Blow the foreign aid budget for the year on this instead.

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,736 total)