Not convincingly.

Who do you reckon has dismissed these theories? Tin-pot or otherwise.

That is a fairly typical ‘shoot the messenger’ tactic used by those who do not want to face the truth about the real reasons behind events where so many have died and been seriously injured.

Interesting that you should try to make me look like the ‘nasty’ here when in reality you should be looking at Who Gained and Following the Money.

Big oil, and defence contractors – and all those private company CEOs ect who are growing rich on the proceeds of the war. Also note how many senators have sons and daughters in the field.

I truly feel for those guys at the front line. But as one well heeled American citizen is quoted as saying (with echoes of Madelaine Albright), ‘cheap oil is worth a few marines a day’.

Do you not understand my points. I am as sickened by the casualties as any right minded human being. I however look behind the media line as my knowledge of history informs me of many other false flag attacks used as pretexts for war. Would you like a list? It would be quite revealing.

I am sorry but until you come up with reasonable counter arguments, instead of bolshy bluster, I do not intend to continue this exchange with yourself.

The fact that you keep repeating this rubbish despite its offensive nature is disgusting. No matter how hard you try to provoke I will not validate you remarks by arguing against them as they are clearly ridiculous.:mad:

On the contrary, I cited a few sources, which if you had read calmly you would have noted.

I spared the readership here a long list of souces because at this stage I did not think it necessary. I could have listed many, many more. Would people like me to do this?

I cited Ruppert in particular for his most exhastive research. Have you read his book? If so then you would appreciate the breadth, and importance, of his sources.

Only the official account is absurd.

The tin pot conspiracy theories have been widely dismissed. There is no need for you to drag peoples reputations and the memories of the victims and those who have died since in the pursuit of justice for this crime through the mud to yet again to satisfy your fantasy land.:mad:

well calling someone’s opinion a lie and insulting rethorics surely shows you can handle others opinions:rolleyes:

Unfortunately he states his opinion as fact.:mad:

So according to you we should just handle racism? After all its someones opinion if they dislike someone becouse of the colour of their skin?:mad:

Nah, he just cannot handlle different obinions, I doupt he really hates anyone..;)

I dont have a problem with different opinions, just with lies and insulting rhetoric.:mad:

You hate him because of his freedom!

No I dislike him becouse he is spreading highly inaccurate tin pot theories that suggest people I was once close to sacrificed their lives for a fraud.

If you want to suggest that the US brought 9/11 on themselves through foreign policy decisions or that without spectacular incompetence it could have been prevented thats fine, its all valid discussion fodder. But to suggest what phixer is, without evidence, yet alone anything even vaguely conclusive is just offensive.

Not to mention the accusation that named individuals are responsible for mass murder. John Lake gets posts deleted becouse somebody somewhere might vaguely interpret them as an accusation of supporting a right wing party yet ‘phixer’ is allowed to accuse people of mass murder and acts of terror without evidence?:mad:

On top of all that is the appalling level of source usage. Phixer uses a single book to justify his absurd claims and takes it as fact without consultation of other theories or sources, or for that matter actual facts.:mad:

I request that phixers post be removed, it is highly offensive and grossly inaccurate.😡 😡

It’s the Chinese that produce the KH-55 clone isn’t it?

A few years back the Ukraine sold some, some to Iran some to China. Not unsurprisingly the Chinese appear to have made the best of their investment.

‘I’m astonished that Politically Correct brigade are allowing the Olympics to go ahead at all when one considers:

Sport is competitive and unfair on those who aren’t any good at it
Glorifies success rather than congratulates failure (surely everyone should get a medal so it’s “inclusive”)
Events involving firearms! My god!
Events involving people enslaving animals (horse riding!)
It’s nations versus nations and therefore, by definition, “racist” and quite probably xenophobic too
Javelin throwing is clearly taking the **** out of 3rd world countries chucking speers at HRH Phil
Swimming discriminates against people afraid of water
Tennis discriminates against people who don’t have Eastern European names
Rowing is an elitest sport only ‘played’ by public schools (the others can’t afford to own rivers)
The Womens 4 x 400 Relay is sexist since no men are in it
The Mens 3,000m Steeplechase is sexist cos no women are in it
There aren’t any sports open only to gay ethnic minorities with disabilities so it’s unfair on them too
High Jumping is heightist and discriminates against those with vertigo
Long Jumping is shortist, where’s the Short Jumping?
Triple Jumping discriminates against people who are numerically challenged
Cycling discriminates against unicyclists
Boxing is too violent, this year they will not be allowed to hit their opponent
Gymnastics discrminates against lardies who look bad in leotards
Discus throwing you can discuss amongst yourselves.’

That post is pure genius!:D 😀 😀