Well it could possibly enter in service as convesional weapon, like US Tomahawk, probably with 1ton HE warhead. 2X200KTs of Meteorit means 2 Tomahawks. Finally I want to ask if more powerful nuclear warhead had the tomahawk of the Granit P-700?

I think it would be far too big and far too expensive to operate in the same way the Tomahawk does. Thats why the Russians have the Kh-55/555 design.;)

Me, I still buy loads of CDs, but nowadays I rip them to my computer and copy the music to my Zune (like a video iPod, but a lot cooler).

I dont know what your smoking but ipod has one massive can of kool-aid over that soap dish shaped lump of MS cr*p!:D

Ironic … ?

Probably.;)

But the West only became more “civilized” once Church and state were separated…

Exactly, and not only were church and state seperated but the influence of religion declined dramatically. Look at most European countries and you will see that religion rarely if ever features in policy debates.

Iv heard you come up with some bull, but that just tops it, so Islam is a threat to western way of life, exactly how is that genious? For the last 1400 years of Islam, whos been attacking who, its the west who launched crusades and the west who carried out countless invasions and attacking muslim countries in the last 100 years that would make the total wars in the last 2000 years look like a walk in the park.

And just for your information when this socalled war on terrorism started, count how many muslims died as a result of American terrorism and other terrorist attacks carried out by other terroists, and compare that with western losses. That will really tell you who really is a threat to the world.

Muslim achievements are well documented in history, but your above qoute is quite ironic. These same repressive regimes in the middle east who dont give equal rights ect are supported by the socalled free west.

Certain strands of Islam are a threat becouse they are violent and oppressive ideology’s that are rapidly growing and spreading. They oppress women, homosexuals, and anyone who does not ‘believe’ in Islam. Just look at the regime that existed in Afghanistan prior to 2001, the ones in Iran and Saudi Arabia now. Even travel to Europe and we can see this evil at work with anti semitic attacks and so called honor killings where women are murdered for bringing ‘shame’ to their families.:mad:

You mean the way of life that is basicly based on innovations invented in Islamic Arabia and in china?:diablo:?

I wasnt aware that the middle east had developed religious tolerence, equal rights for women or the computer chip, or electricity etc.:rolleyes:

Sealordlawrence,

The frequency of the plasma screen should equal the frequency of the radar, and the timing of the screen should be putted in between the two radar phases, so you have tingling/flashing like radar-screen-radar-screen, and so on…that would work, in theory.

In reality, you always have lower and higher cutoffs in any kind of flashing, and that cutoffs would interfere with the “second phase”, be it radar or screen. Those cutoffs would be easily evaded if they were same in both phases…in that case, you would leave an “error zone”, much like in digtal theory where the 0-0.7V signal equals binary zero and 4.3-5V signal equals binary one while the 0.7-4.3 range equals error in coding, but cutoffs are different for both types of radiation, therefore that would require precise synchronization.

If you leave cutoffs as they are, you are efectivelly degrading both radar precision and screen efficiency. In trans-phase region, “remains” of the screen would interfere with reactivated radar, and vice versa, degrading exactly (n) percent performance of respected regime equal to how much cutoff interval has it’s share in whole working interval.

In my work on high-powered electrostatic fields which needed to interact with other sources of radio emissions, i haven’t managed to drop-down cutoff beyond 5-8 percent average. I was using COTS components, they’re going to use milspec stuff, they’re 1500 times combined more smart and have more expirience than i have, but i’d say that whole system would degrade the performance of both the radar antenna and the screen for 1-3%.

It doesn’t look like much, but it’s degrading. However, in this case, the ends justify the means.

Tganks for the input Zare, you clearly know more than I do!:)