dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,176 through 5,190 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan AF News and Discussions 2006 #2575782
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    If I remember rightly the next chinese engine is in the very early phases of development now, this is purely from memory and I will check it later, But it will be based on a core known as CJ-2000, will have a two stage compressor and T/W ratio 10+. It is assumed that this will be the engine of the J-XX.

    in reply to: Norway to Back out of F-35 JSF Over Industrial Share #2575798
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Thye problem with the JSF programme is that it was initiated under clinton, who believed in international cooperation (actually thought is was a good thing) and wasnt so carfull over technology transfer (take UAE F-16E/F for instance). But the Bush white hous regards the JSF as US project and is desperate to protect US technological advantages. Thus the deals made under clinton are now coming under pressure, which aproach you think is best is just a matter of personal opinion, but thats how politics effects arms procurement.

    in reply to: Bangladesh purchases 16 F-7BG's from China #2575807
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Who says china is going to offer the original design and the FC-104 prototype as seperate entitys, in fact wasnt the reason for the redesign due to design issues with the original prototypes?
    China will only build the FC1-04 prototype but obviously you will be able to add features as money allows.
    There is no way china will manufacture both the design of the original 3 prototypes and the FC104, I have a feeling this is another case of tphuang talking cr*p.

    in reply to: The IAF – March-April 2006 #2575843
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Personally I realy like the Gripen and think it would be a good option for the IAF, but I would like to see it with the EJ-200, with SAAB’s reasonably close cooperation with BAe it shouldnt be to difficult.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2575879
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The chinese defense budget is to increase by some 14% this year, so you can expect these ‘exciting times’ to continue.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4773358.stm

    in reply to: Pakistan's Missiles and Strategic News/Disscussions #1818238
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    That means nothing for the pakistani F-16 deal. In the white house the India pakistan situation is not as important as what realy matters. India is being built up to face china so the US dosnt have to. Basically India will continue spending vast sums of money on defence (hopefully in the US), whilst hundreds of millions of Indias own population continue to live in poverty and the aids epidemic continues unabated, so that the US can keep its own defence spending down and not have to worry to much about china.

    in reply to: Britain Opposes Common EU Defense Fund #2575968
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The UK is still in the EU, becouse of the massive economic benefits that doing so brings, but they havnt joined the Euro or pushed for further intergration due to the current relative economic weakness of the euro zone, a desire to remain a free and independant country, and the fact that ignorant backward countrys refuse point blank to reform the EU budget to allow greater effort to go into R&D.

    In fact the great Irony is that whilst the french seek to balme the UK the EU’s weaknesses it is they who refuse to reform the budget, so the EU is left spending 4 times the amount of money on farm subsidies as it does on R&D. If Iremeber rightly china spemds more on R&D than the Europe. So basically when certain european countrys stop living in the middle ages and wake up to the harsh reality of the 21st century, where it is not just the US they have to compete with, but also china, India and probably Russia in the next few decades, some improvement in the sitiuation might be made.

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2576340
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    read that article more times than I can count, it says china is working on, not that it has been done. Russia already has PESA and is very close to having AESA.

    in reply to: Britain Opposes Common EU Defense Fund #2576385
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The European armed forces and governments are simply not sufficiently intergrated for this. If Europe wants a European armed force then alot of countryies are going to have to give up an awful lot, but its the only way a truly unified defence industry will work.

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2576415
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Show me a picture of a TVC engined J-10.
    Show me an article saying that the J-10 has PESA now.
    Prove chinas AESA development is further ahead then everybody thinks.
    Or stop talking BS.

    AL-31FN deliveries discusion here http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=53046&page=5&pp=30

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2576437
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Do you have any proof that the J-10 has a PESA? Do you have anything to show that there are currently J-10’s fitted with TVC?
    The AL-31FM1 deal was only sighned in thlatter half of last year, the engines are not likely to be delivered yet.
    A further order for regular AL-31FNs was made after the original 54 deal. We have seen a picture of the last 100th J-10 and it did not have a TVC engine.

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2576768
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    J-10 dosnt use a PESA right now, it uses a mechanically scanned array. It also dosnt use TVC right now, bith these are being worked on but there is no evidence that they have flown yet. The TVC is a direct purchase from Russia so it isnt even chinese.
    Some 300 AL-31FN variants have been ordered, thats enough to keep the J-10 production line going until 2010 if the chinese maintain a J-10 output of 5 a month.

    in reply to: Denel AH-2A Rooivalk Attack Helicopter #2577086
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    http://www.denel.co.za/Aerospace/Rooivalk.pdf

    According to the above, one of the options for the Rooivalk is a pulse doppler radar. Does anybody know what radar this would be and where it would be mounted?

    The Rooivalk looks like a chopper with real potential, its just a shame that there hasnt been a bigger order for it.

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2577382
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Get real, china dosnt have an AESA fighter radar that is anywhere near ready as opposed to Russia planning to flight test the ZHuk-A next year. No chinese aircraft has flown with Indigenous TVC, and the J-10 looks as if it will never get an indigenous engine.

    in reply to: Chinese developed J11 and Su-35 #2577398
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Russia is offering India the Mig-35 with 3D-TVC, AESA radar and a 6000hr airframe life, show me a chinese fighter that can match that now?
    I will grant you that chinese avionics are improving rapidly, as is every part of the chinese aerospace industry, but it needs another decade to fully mature and get the technology currently being develope into service. For instance we have seen the compressor stage for the next gen fighter engine, the FC1-04 has advanced aerodynamic features but has yet to fly and is only a mid-sized aircraft. Once these things get brought together in a top line fighter (j-xx) then china will be on par with the rest of the world, although possibly not the US.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,176 through 5,190 (of 5,730 total)