When the UK entered the JSF programme Clinton was in the White House and everything was huncky Dory, Bush on the other hand appears nervous about the US’s future position in the world and would like to do everything in his power to maintain Americas advantage. I would also say that there are a few things for the US to be concerned about in the UK, firstly the relatively close relationship with Europe and collaborative projects, the china embargo issue, and the UK’s seeming inability to deal with Islamic fundermentalists (The UK has people dressing up as suicide bombers and parading around the capitals streets).
The same applies to every country on earth. Even the what we regard as western states, many of which face no strategic threat at all, and yet deploy far more expensive weapons systems, every country has within it situations that could be improved, yet just becouse a state is poor relative to another it does not mean it does not have the right to buy weapons.
What radar is the new J-8IIM meant to use?
Why the hell would Japan need Raptors to defend itself against North Korea. I know the Raptor is good byt it cant shoo down Ballistic missiles and for what is in the NK’s airforce just about any reasonably modern fighter will do. China I can understand, but North Korea?
Considering how Singpore is using F15’s to replace A-4’s I think it is somewhat unsafe to assume that they are simply going to buy an aircraft that simply replaces the F-5.
It would be nice to see the UK support its defence industry in a similar way to how other countries do (ie france), although if you keep getting screwed over by companys you tend not to go back (hint hint BAe).
Personally I have always thought that the RAF should have gone for 25 C-17s and then kept the order for 25 A-400M’s skipping the C-130J.
2017 is long way a way. Maybe this could be a role for the Vixen 500E?
At no point did I suggest that two countrys were on the cusp of a major strategic alliance you just misrepresented what I wrote for reasons which are beyond me. I simply said that as the two countrys are likely to be the last to operate the F-15 (having just purchased it) and it may therefore in the future be a good idea if the two countrys cooperated in that area. At no point did I mention a strategic alliance of any sort let alone a major one. And the F-15K and SG may be different aircraft but they are not that different.
Talking of the future it might be a good idea if you read peoples posts and respond to what they write not what you want to respond to.
If I remember correctly the reason for that was down to the fact that it simply wouldnt be that easy. I remeber hearing people talk about a completly new nose section and a fuselage plug.
It has been suggested to me that the Litening pods being ordered for the Typhoon, may find they way onto harriers as well.
And test launches cost money, a lot of money.
Having just ordered the F-15SG, the singapore airforce already has quite close commonality with Korea and these two countrys are likely to be the last to operate the F-15 (many years from now) so future cooperation may be a good move. The F-15SG already gives Singapore a good long range near strategic asset. Based on what Singpore has ordered in recent years I would suspect that they will order the best they can afford which suggests to me they will eventually go the JSF route.
As for the trainer requirement, well singpore seems to love its off-set agreements so the best option for Singapores own industry will probably have the best chance.
It was originally planned that the Sea Harrier F/A-2 was to get the uprated engine of the GR-9A as well as ASRAAM, obviously this was dropped when the F/A2 was dropped.
The original plane for the GR9 was for ASRAAM, Brimstone and Storm Shadow. I know that Storm Shadow has been dropped, but I think that the other two may still be planned.
Looks like an ingenious solution to a multitude of requirements, very impressive.