If Israel is not happy with the Sufas radar why does it not ask for the AESA version fitted to the UEAF Block 60s? That would keep the US happy and provide a better radar?
How does the Elta 2032 compare with AESA in the Block 60?

Carriers only allow you to attack countrys with accesible coastlines, if they are land locked you still need permission from neighbouring countrys.
The 7/7 suspects did not attend terrorist training camps in the full sense of the title, in fact it is still not certain that they even travelled abroad, but if they did what they attended were actually religous schools in which individuals preach that Jihad is the way forward, the usage of Bombs against such sites would only be counter-productive widening the belief in parts of the muslim world that the war on terror is a war on Islam thus increasing tension. The best option (as in fact is happening) is targetted arrests followed by prosecution and imprisonment, thus seperating extremists from the larger part of the population.
I am not arguing that Britain should not have aircraft carriers but that two are sufficient and that they are from the best method if dealing with terrorism.
If it is the military operating in a police role that is required to defend the people of Britain then so be it, but there is no need to operate a large armed force when it does not have an enemy to fight. The US and the coalition have got it right in afghanistan, using military power to hunt for terrorist suspects and infrastructure and remove them, whilst at the same time attempting to introduce democracy and reduce poverty and violence so as to remove the motivation for people to resort to terrorism

How usefull is a CVF at stopping terrorists on the underground?
Armed forces need to be tailored to the threat, the threat, as has been shown over the last few days is UK based terrorists, thus would it not be better to spend more money dealing with that threat than preparing to face an enemy which does not exist?
Granted your ships would be more flexible, but they would not be suited to any special task in the same way LPDs and other assets are.

you think you can get enough budget out of LPDS, a very specific desighn to purchase to more carriers, whilst massively reducing the RN’s amphibious capability? thats one of the most insane ideas Ive heard.
To be honest I think britains defence budget, some of it at least, would be better spent on dealing with terrorists in britain rather than on having more than 2 carriers.

which six ships? the RN only has four real aviation ships at the moment of which only 2 are fully active at any one time. The RN certainly cant sacrifice any more ships in other areas.

The problem of six carriers is manpower, spmething the RN is very short of.
We already do play with the big boys, are armed forces are a similar size to those of france, which has a similar size economy. We need to except the fact, that we are no longer one of the world super powers, just a powerful country.
Why do we need more defence spending? who are we going to war with? we get on with all our neighbours, Most of our overseas territorys are for the time being safe, all we realy have to worry about is terrorism, and you dont need to be armed to the teeth to fight that.
I have to say,I am confused by your belief that the british media is anti defence spending and that they have an agenda. I have not realy come acrosse this, in fact I usually see a fairly balanced view in the media.