dark light

DH106

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 98 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thomson 757 – blank window rows ? #498733
    DH106
    Participant

    Great – thanks 🙂

    in reply to: Earhart again #971941
    DH106
    Participant

    I think the Bormann mystery was put to bed not so long ago with a DNA test.

    in reply to: Necessary Tail #539305
    DH106
    Participant

    A wing on it’s own is unstable in pitch.

    Let’s say at a certain angle of attack you balance it with the C.G. in the same place as the centre of lift – it balances so no tailplane required. But if you increase the angle of attack, the centre of pressure (lift) moves forward which then creates an out of balance moment which tends to pitch the wing up MORE. The reverse happens for decreasing angle of attack – the centre of pressure moves back tending to pitch the wing further down. The tailplane is there in part to provide a large corrective moment and prevent this effect.

    in reply to: Super A320 video #556085
    DH106
    Participant

    Yeah – superb angles ! 😀

    in reply to: Viscount / Vanguard #556565
    DH106
    Participant

    My understanding is that the choice of which 2 engines to shut down is dictated by which 2 engines have hydraulic pumps attached. Most Viscounts (all but the very first versions) have their pumps on the inner engines and thus shut down the outer ones for taxiing. Presumably the Vanguard has it’s pumps on the outer engines.

    in reply to: VC10 at LBA this lunchtime #568259
    DH106
    Participant

    Cheers lbaspotter 😀

    in reply to: Dead passenger tries to board aircraft #570963
    DH106
    Participant

    LOL.

    Just to be a bit pedantic about the title… I’m reasonably confident it wasn’t the dead passenger that was trying to board the aircraft himself, but rather the anxious relatives that were trying to board HIM. 😀 I might be wrong though . :p

    in reply to: Airport scanners could break child porn laws #574475
    DH106
    Participant

    I’m a paedophobe

    I give small children sweets to go away

    Moggy

    LOL – so you’re “grooming” them (giving them sweets) to “manipulate” them (make them go away) :rolleyes::D:o:

    Welcome to today’s PC society in all it’s glory. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: USAir defers 54 Airbus deliveries #507150
    DH106
    Participant

    If it’s not Boeing I ain’t going.

    Shouldn’t that be:

    “The latest Boeing – ain’t going” ? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: TIGHAR, another wild goose chase? #1165729
    DH106
    Participant

    It’s a theory they’ve been working on for many years – but have yet to come up with any definite proof although there is some anicdotal evidence. It’s not their first trip to Nikumaroro, they’ve been quite a few times and brought back various artifacts – but no ‘smoking gun’ as of yet.

    in reply to: Air New Zealand DC10 disaster 30 years on #527397
    DH106
    Participant

    I think it was ‘an orchestrated litany of lies’, as Mr Justice Mahon said.
    Next time I’m back in the old country, I’ll ask a few people who were around at the time what they think. I do remember a general suspicion that ANZ was telling porkies in the aftermath, though.
    Peter Mahon wrote a book about the affair before he died, I think. I’ll try to find out what it was called and let you all know. It will make interesting reading.

    I agree totally.
    Mahon’s report was a well investigated and balanced report and he clearly pinpoints all the true causal factors of the accident.
    The main reason for all the controversy I think was his complete lack of ‘pulling punches’ to the establishment – which included the Government as a major Air NZ shareholder. e.g his infamous “orchestrated litany of lies” statement.
    I highly recommend the docu-drama “Erebus – The Aftermath” with Frank Finlay as Justice Peter Mahon.

    in reply to: Air New Zealand DC10 disaster 30 years on #527807
    DH106
    Participant

    Be interested to know what the majority of New Zealander’s view on the causes – especially after 30 years to reflect.
    Would they generally go with Chippendale or Mahon – or perhaps opinions are very divided?

    in reply to: Burtonwood Air Base #1182984
    DH106
    Participant

    Google Earth shows two of the old hangers just to the NW of the M62 Jn 8 roundabout. The old curved peri-track/taxiway curves west away from them and the ghost of the old NW-SE runway is visible. This is somewhat to the west of Goldcliff Close though.

    in reply to: Amelia #1194308
    DH106
    Participant

    ……….he promised it would be aeronautically good with correct period aircraft. However, he said he couldn’t provide too many details.

    Mmmm – wonder what they’re using for Earhart’s L10E Electra that she disappeared in. As far as I know there’s only one other L10E extant and that’s a long term restoration project that isn’t airworthy. I think there are a couple of L10A’s airworthy including the one Linda Finch recreated Earhart’s round the world trip in……
    Just so long as they don’t use a Beech 18 :mad::eek::(

    in reply to: Your top 3 best looking airliners…. #547521
    DH106
    Participant

    The surprise is that it wasn’t

    Mine are

    1) 767
    2) 757
    3) A330

    Only cos I can’t have 7

    Rgds Cking

    Beauty is obviously in the eye of the beholder….

    Agree with 2) 757 absolutely beautiful !

    BUT

    1) 767…. ?? – the stretched versions were okay, but the stubby -200, come on… “Ugly Betty” or what !!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 98 total)