dark light

KabirT

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,926 through 2,940 (of 6,864 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A smokey start on a United 757 #725598
    KabirT
    Participant

    great pic WD!:)

    in reply to: Boeing 7E7 #725605
    KabirT
    Participant

    It would be a pitty if the shark fins were to be dropped… it wont show the new design on the mainframe.

    in reply to: End of the Delta MD11 fleet #726093
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    It basically had disappointing performance compared to the A340. Even the ‘current’ model had numerous modifications to increase its range from the first ones off the line. In freighter configuration, performance decreases anyway, even for the 744, so then it wasn’t a factor for the MD11 in that standard.

    Although the MD 11 was initially posing a threat to Boeing sales…..so they bought it off.

    in reply to: I've become the next member of the 1000 club! #726097
    KabirT
    Participant

    Well done wannabe pilot.:)

    in reply to: The biggest day of my life! #726099
    KabirT
    Participant

    Best of luck Martin.:)

    in reply to: Russian Commercial Aircraft #726101
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
    The TU 134 has more than one type. There was the extremely unefficient (need high load factor to even get a small profit out of it) TU 134. Lack on navigation, if you see the glass nose. The TU 134A had a stretch and newer engines, but was still not the efficient. The Tu 134 B6 which was a good choice for a cheap aircraft and a fair run cost. The Tu 134B6 had, again, a stretch. On this model the glass nose disappeared.
    Considering the TU204..; a few variants are powered by RB211 engines.

    The RB211’s are an option on the TU 204…. but most airlines being operated in Russia itself they have gone with Russian engines.

    in reply to: PIAs first B777 #726103
    KabirT
    Participant

    well done Sandy.:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #412317
    KabirT
    Participant

    Air Supply

    in reply to: A to Z of bands #1984674
    KabirT
    Participant

    Air Supply

    in reply to: Boeing 7E7 #727741
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by Bmused55
    Haven’t I been saying that throughout the thread ?!?

    The 7E7 is meant as a replacement for both the 767 and 757.

    With seating capacity equalt to the 767 she’ll fly further than a 767-400 it is projected.
    With the Seating capacity of a 757 she’ll fly even further.
    A perfect multrole aircraft.

    well maybe u have…what do you want me to quote it or something?:rolleyes:

    But i would want to know how efficient this machine will be.

    in reply to: PIAs first B777 #727742
    KabirT
    Participant

    hmmmm…… i know the tail is looking pathetic…the rest… hmmmm.

    in reply to: Russian Commercial Aircraft #727744
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by Gaurav
    Ok THis is a really stupid question, but do any Russian models have infligh entertainment? like movies?

    i am sure the likes of IL 96s do.

    in reply to: Ever seen a 737 freighter #727970
    KabirT
    Participant

    heres the Indian example.

    in reply to: End of the Delta MD11 fleet #728696
    KabirT
    Participant

    This is very sad indeed….. i love the MD 11… probably one of the ebst looking a/c flying.:(

    in reply to: General Discussion #413619
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Depends. What have you been drinking?

    Flood.

    probably the same thing you drink.:D

Viewing 15 posts - 2,926 through 2,940 (of 6,864 total)