dark light

KabirT

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,301 through 3,315 (of 6,864 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Happy 18th, Kabir! #692029
    KabirT
    Participant

    Thanx all!:D

    Well i did join long time back. First AW didnt have a member system, you did not need a username etc to post….you just post…lol.

    in reply to: 737 in hailstorm #692036
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by wysiwyg
    Yes, big time.

    Even on the 777…….i was watching a programme the other day and they showed the B777 engines passing a hail storm test.

    in reply to: Sky-Bus – To be or not to be? #692040
    KabirT
    Participant

    They are starting an airline and dont know there is no such thing called a B765………looks like all hocus pocus to me.

    in reply to: Simply amazing! #692795
    KabirT
    Participant

    first one is definately a fake.

    A330 is awsome…i loooove that c/s!:D

    in reply to: Happy 18th, Kabir! #693014
    KabirT
    Participant

    thank you fellas…….yes Hand 18 is the age of adulthood.

    in reply to: EBBR Spotting #693359
    KabirT
    Participant

    Brilliant pics Frank….love the Malmo Aviation pic!:)

    in reply to: 737 in hailstorm #693376
    KabirT
    Participant

    wow thats some damage..i remember reading a story of a VC 10 that was caught in such hail…the whole radome section of the aircraft was knocked out, a fighter did an outside check before it landed safely.

    in reply to: Airline names? #694322
    KabirT
    Participant

    my latest flight was on Jet Airways ATR 72 to city of Chandigargh in N.India.

    in reply to: 1st picture of new Wanula Dreaming #694326
    KabirT
    Participant

    still looking good!:)

    in reply to: Big head #694754
    KabirT
    Participant

    Congrats Gaurav!:)

    in reply to: Virgin Atlantic Considering New Order #694757
    KabirT
    Participant

    well they do operate B747s so even if they go on to 777s to replace old A340s…i wont be surprised.

    in reply to: First TU 154 or II62 #695464
    KabirT
    Participant

    But i read TU 154 was origionaly a military design?

    in reply to: check this…. #695466
    KabirT
    Participant

    Originally posted by steve rowell
    All i’m getting is an aircraft window!!!!!!

    try switching on speakers!:D

    in reply to: First TU 154 or II62 #696106
    KabirT
    Participant

    TU 154 was actualy first designed as a bomber……..its wings are still those which were designed for a bomber. So TU 154s first prototype was a bomber.

    in reply to: First TU 154 or II62 #696361
    KabirT
    Participant

    I am guessing scrapped.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,301 through 3,315 (of 6,864 total)