nice pic SOC!
I dont know…yes Bangalore would be a better destination for BA…LH already operates there.
ok u were right EGNM!:)
Originally posted by EGNM
i think i can remember some pics of the a/c in storage in sweden in AW from the last couple of months – nice looking a/c with engines on top of the wing!
on top of the wing…u mean rear mounted. The only jet with top of the wing mounted is the AN 74.
All i kow is it was emant to operate to small airfields and used very less space for take offs and landings.
yes it will hurt a already badly wounded airline. Many poeple also died in Bangladesh and India……effects of El Nino.
Nothing for next year or so or maybe more.
good news for Hyderabad, a fast emerging IT center. Although i dont see much traffic from there for BA for next 4-5 years.
Originally posted by greekdude1
I love how nobody wishes to address the whole, “Airbus giving up on its products” issue. I believe the 763 is in the same class as the A332. The ranges and pax load are very similar. Again, that is debateable, because who does the 764 go head on with? Either way, it doesn’t matter. As I mentioned previously, both companies make great aircraft. Some are just better in particular markets, than others. As far as “what if’s” go, yeah, ‘what if?’ You can ‘what if?’ till you’re blue in the face. ‘What if’ Pan Am didn’t go under? ‘What if’ TWA hadn’t sold its Heathrow slots to AA back in 91? What if the RB211 didn’t ruin the L1011? ‘What if’ IAE had come through with the Superfan? Well, they didn’t, that’s the bottom line. As a result, the A340 was stuck with juiced up 737 engines till the 500 series Trents came out. My question is, why didn’t they just initially stick four 757 engines under there, a la the C-17 and IL-96M? At the time (still is), it was still a rather modern, fuel efficient engine, and they would have gotten better peformance on it.
I agree with most you say..specialy i think comparing Airbus and Boeing is unfair to both companies as both make world-class jets.
I dont think comparing freighters and commercial airliners is right. Airbus is not really active in freighter section…i heard a A330 F varient but just heard.
Originally posted by monster500
Copenhagen for me, it has excellent facilities and its well designed.
totally agreed there…has to be Kastrup, Copenhagen. For its facilities and sheer charecter.
I agree with GD1 on some points. The A343 lacks power which affects its overal performance. I think Airbus aircraft sell so much just because they are fuel efficient, otherwise i dont see anythin in the A343 that is better than the B772.
I dont think it can.
welcome to the forum Sahayam.
The A3XX is now called the A380…and yes we know its big.
r u seggesting pilots dont have a life and need dating service?:D