dark light

KabirT

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,526 through 6,540 (of 6,864 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: For all you Vulcan Fans #2112380
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: For all you Vulcan Fans

    1st pic: XL445 at Edwards AFB in California, pic of October 1980.

    2nd Pic: XJ824 at Duxford, pic of July 2001.

    in reply to: TNT to get the Tu-204 #684045
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: TNT to get the Tu-204

    Bravia showed the TU 204 at Farnborough, Dubai Air Show and recently in the Asian Aerospace Singapore and failed to get any customers. Bravia is cancelling its contract with Tupelov by 10th April.

    in reply to: For all you Vulcan Fans #2112452
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: For all you Vulcan Fans

    i simply love the Vulcan….great pic…
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c94c1634997a745.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c94c18349f39a46.jpg

    in reply to: Another challenge call, from me! #684122
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Another challenge call, from me!

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 17-03-02 AT 03:58 PM (GMT)]exactly…he has raced down to that 1000 post mark…great job Ja….

    in reply to: TNT to get the Tu-204 #684228
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: TNT to get the Tu-204

    Yes…its good to see the most under-rated a/c to get some attention. It has great potential in it and also its good load factor. also the 122 is equiped with Collin avionics…pretty good for a Russian make.
    _______________________
    Powerplants

    Tu-204 – Two 158.3kN (35,580lb) Aviadvigatel PS90A turbofans. Tu-204220 – Two 191.7kN (43,100lb) Rolls-Royce RB211535E4 or 535F5 turbofans.

    Performance

    Tu-204 – Cruising speed 810km/h to 850km/h (437 to 460kt). Range with max payload 2430km (1312nm), with design payload 3400km (1835nm). Tu-204220 – Speeds same. Range with max payload 4600km (2483m).

    Weights

    Tu-204 – Operating empty 58,300kg (128,530lb), max takeoff 94,600kg (208,550lb). Tu-204220 – Operating empty 59,000kg (130,070lb), max takeoff 110,750kg (244,155lb).

    Dimensions

    Tu-204 – Wing span 41.80m (137ft 2in), length 46.10m (151ft 3in), height 13.90m (45ft 7in). Wing area 182.4m2 (1963.4sq ft).

    Capacity

    Flightcrew of two, although original Aeroflot requirement specified a flight engineer. Tu-204-200 seats up to 212 six abreast at 82cm (32in) pitch, or two class seating for 30 business class at 96cm (38in) pitch at six abreast and 154 economy at 81cm (32in) pitch and six abreast. Tu-224/234 seats 166 in a single class.

    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c949cd2fb454a7d.jpg

    in reply to: Airport pic of the day-15/03/02 #685083
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Airport pic of the day-15/03/02

    looks very much like a Il-76, the angle is such that its making it look small…

    in reply to: Airport pic of the day- 16/03/02 #685226
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Airport pic of the day- 16/03/02

    Yes it was in AW…..its Havana in Cuba…..

    in reply to: Flying P-40's #2112496
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Flying P-40’s

    Oh well…… 🙂

    in reply to: New airplanes for KLM #685868
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: New airplanes for KLM

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 15-03-02 AT 02:29 PM (GMT)]Well…this news had to come sometime, there long haul fleet was getting quite old now, specially those MD 11s(althou i love them). Well i personally feel they will go for the 777-200ER, it will solve there purpose. besides being the most populor model yet, the 200ER is also not bad on fuel, and the range is good(13,667 km), on the other hand A330s range is 8348 km and A343s is 13,343 km. According to me they might go for B777, also they have been a old customer of Boeing, so there experience with them will be quite good, good enough to get the 777. On the other hand, they might by Airbus because its a European manufacturer and spare parts and maintanence will be little cheaper.

    in reply to: Flying P-40's #2112628
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Flying P-40’s

    History: The P-40 fighter/bomber was the last of the famous “Hawk” line produced by Curtiss Aircraft in the 1930s and 1940s, and it shared certain design elements with its predecessors, the Hawk and Sparrowhawk. It was the third-most numerous US fighter of World War II. An early prototype version of the P-40 was the first American fighter capable of speeds greater than 300 mph. Design work on the aircraft began in 1937, but numerous experimental versions were tested and refined before the first production version of the P-40, the Model 81, appeared in May 1940. By September of that year, over 200 had been delivered to the Army Air Corps. 185 more were delivered to the United Kingdom in the fall of 1940, where they were designated the Tomahawk Mk I.

    Early combat operations pointed to the need for more armor and self-sealing fuel tanks, which were included in the P-40B (called the Tomahawk Mk IIA in the UK). These improvements came at price: a significant loss of performance due to the extra weight. Further armor additions and fuel tank improvements added even more weight in the P-40C (Tomahawk Mk IIB). Curtiss addressed the airplane’s mounting performance problems with the introduction of the P-40D (Kittyhawk Mk I), which was powered by a more powerful version of the Allison V-1710 engine, and had two additional wing-mounted guns. The engine change resulted in a slightly different external appearance, which was the reason the RAF renamed it from the Tomahawk to the Kittyhawk. Later, two more guns were added in the P-40E (Kittyhawk Mk IA), and this version was used with great success by General Claire Chenault’s American Volunteer Group (The Flying Tigers) in China.

    Some additional models, each with slight improvements in engine power and armament, were the P-40F (with a 1300 hp Rolls-Royce Merlin engine), the P-40G, P-40K (Kittyhawk Mk III), P-40L, P-40M and finally, the P-40N, of which 5200 were built (more than any other version.) While it was put to good use and was certainly numerous in most theaters of action in WWII, the P-40’s performance was quickly eclipsed by the newer aircraft of the time, and it was not considered one of the “great fighters” of the war.

    Nicknames: Gipsy Rose Lee (UK nickname for the P-40L)nice nick 🙂

    Specifications: (P-40N):
    Engine: 1360hp Allison V-1710-81 inline piston engine
    Weight: Empty 6,000 lbs., Max Takeoff 11,400 lbs
    Wing Span: 37ft. 4in.
    Length: 33ft. 4in.
    Height: 12ft. 4in.
    Performance:
    Maximum Speed at 10,000ft: 378mph
    Ceiling: 38,000ft
    Range: 240 miles (with no external tanks)
    Armament:
    Six 12.7mm (0.5-inch) wing-mounted machine guns
    Up to 1,500lbs of bombs on three wing hardpoints

    Number Built: Approximately 15,000

    Number Still Airworthy: 19

    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c91b46e2acd19c9.jpg

    in reply to: Saab 340 #686066
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Saab 340

    I dont have much idea about NWs S340s…..yea actually my booklet is a lil old, maybe they changed over during there upgradtion of the a/c with Fairchild.So i noticed that Japan has them, never knew that before. I doubt if there are any S340 or S2000 pilots here……

    in reply to: Airport pic of the day-15/03/02 #686067
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Airport pic of the day-15/03/02

    Dusseldorf, Germany…i think for the first time i guessed a European airport right…. 🙂

    in reply to: Saab 340 #686070
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Saab 340

    Saab 340A are still in use with Northwest, and were with Kendell i think. Kendell has both A and B. The As with Kendel were leased from ILFC i think. You can diffrenciate between Saab 340 A & B mostly by technical specifications, otherwise Bs fuselage is slightly bigger, its actually very hard to make out. The engine specifications i got from a Saab corporate book i have, so its got to be right. Sweden uses the Saab 340 as AWACS system with Ericson radar i think. Otherwise i can only think of Greece as well….
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c917ab96ae1d291.jpg

    in reply to: HUDs #686313
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: HUDs

    so does the Saab 2000…..

    in reply to: Saab 340 #686467
    KabirT
    Participant

    RE: Saab 340

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 14-03-02 AT 03:51 PM (GMT)]The Saab 340 is indeed a great a/c…..specially for the role it was made for, regional, safe and economical transportation.

    The Saab 340 is a populor aircraft, but due to slow sales when it was introduced in the market in the early 1990s, Saab had ceased production.

    In 1979 SaabScania of Sweden and Fairchild in the USA reached an agreement to conduct joint feasibility and development studies on a 30 to 40 seat commuter airliner. The resulting SF340 design was launched in September 1980 with the aim of capturing 25 to 30% of its market. Within the 65/35 SaabFairchild partnership split Saab was responsible for the fuselage, fin and final assembly, while Fairchild was responsible for the wings, engine nacelles and empennage. The two companies selected the General Electric CT7 (a commercial development of the T700 which powers Sikorsky’s S70 series of military helicopters) to power the new airliner.
    The first improved development of the Saab 340 was the 340B. More powerful engines improved hot and high performance, while other changes included a greater span tailplane, a higher max takeoff weight and better range. Deliveries began in September 1989.

    The last development of the 340 was the 340B Plus, which introduced changes developed for the larger Saab 2000, including an improved cabin interior. The first 340B Plus was delivered in March 1994. Lack of sales and profitibility however forced Saab to cease 340 and 2000 production, with the lines winding up in 1998.

    Saab also in between had some sort of agreement with Fairchild……which i dont have any info. at the moment.

    I love Saab cars as well 🙂 ….specially the models with most of the dash-panels on top like in there aircrafts….

    The Saab 340 is quite populor in Europe, USA and Australia/NZ. The main rivals….Jetstream 41(out of production i think), Beechcraft 1900D, DHC Dash 8, DHC Dash 7, Dornier 228/328, EMB 120, LET 610.

    Here are the specifications in details for the Saab 340…..

    Powerplants

    340A – Two 1295kW (1735shp) General Electric CT75A2 turboprops driving four blade constant speed Dowty or Hamilton Standard props. 340B – Two 1305kW (1750shp) CT79Bs.
    ______________
    Performance

    340A – Max cruising speed 515km/h (278kt), economical cruising speed 484km/h (260kt). Range with max payload 1455km (785nm), range with max fuel 3975km (2145nm). 340B – Max cruising speed 523km/h (282kt), long range cruising speed 467km/h (252kt). Range with 35 pax and reserves at max cruising speed 1490km (805nm), at long range cruising speed 1735km (935nm).
    _______________

    Weights

    340A – Operating empty 7810kg (17,215lb), max takeoff 12,370kg (27,275lb). 340B – Operating empty 8140kg (17,945lb), max takeoff 13,155kg (29,000lb).
    ________________
    Dimensions

    Wing span 21.44m (70ft 4in), length 19.73m (64ft 9in), height 6.97m (22ft 11in). Wing area 41.8m2 (450.0sq ft).
    ________________
    Capacity

    Flightcrew of two. Main cabin seats up to 37, or typically 33 to 35 with a galley at three abreast and 76cm (30in) pitch. Combi seats 19 passengers and 1500kg (3310lb) of cargo. A small number of 340s are outfitted in corporate configurations.
    _________________
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c90c54b6618877e.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c90c5676645ae7c.html

Viewing 15 posts - 6,526 through 6,540 (of 6,864 total)