dark light

kev35

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,786 through 4,800 (of 8,395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A thought of mine #1351786
    kev35
    Participant

    Let me ask you a hypothetical question Ollie?

    How would you approach a Veteran to contribute to your work? What measures would you take to assure them of your integrity and sincerity? How would you handle the often difficult and painful direction these conversations can take when you are unlocking 60 year old memories?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: A thought of mine #1351857
    kev35
    Participant

    I never thought it was easy and i wish the guys all the best luck in doing the Spitfire book.

    In case you haven’t realised Ollie, EN830 IS the driving force behind this Spitfire project.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: A thought of mine #1351875
    kev35
    Participant

    Ollie.

    Sorry to say this but might I suggest you listen and grow up?

    Everyone would support you, but you consistently fail to listen and learn. Some of us have tried to give you good advice which has been earned the hard way. It is of the utmost importance that the younger generation continue their enthusiasm for aviation history but it has to tempered with copious amounts of common sense. You will make contaxts if you pursue your ventures but it seems very apparent that your attitude will very soon lead to you having no contacts.

    Ollie. Try standing back and reading some of the absolute drivel you have posted on here. You make good and interesting points but they are few and far between. It is often questioned whether you are real or whether, in fact, you are a spoof character. There are times when I can’t make my mind up.

    I have never, ever, put anyone on my ignore list in the five years I have posred here, but I have to say, if it weren’t for the comedy value, you could well be the first.

    But, the arrogance of youth will prevail. When you’re older you might just find yourself looking back on a lot of missed opportunities.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: A thought of mine #1352066
    kev35
    Participant

    Ollie.

    Enthusiasm is a wonderful thing and I sincerely hope you never lose it, and I really don’t want to rain on your parade, but…..

    1. Originality. The instigators of the Spitfire Anniversary book are already established researchers. They have contacts that you and I don’t, and in the circles they need to move in to pull this off, they are known. You will have noticed who the contributors are already which gives you an idea of the potential quality of this volume. It has been suggested, perhaps unkindly but no less true for that, that you have missed the boat on the Hurricane anniversary by some margin. A brief search of the internet will tell you that you are in competition with the likes of Mason, Birtles, Hiscock et al in producing a work on the Hurricane. Might I respectfully suggest you choose something more original, maybe a Squadron History of a Squadron with strong Hurricane connections, or an aspect of the Hurricane’s service which has not received the acclaim it should have?

    2. Practicalities. You’ll need a great deal of time for the research, that is true of any project, and then you’ll need to research it again to check what you’ve already done. I would suggest the minimum of 18 months to two years, possibly longer. It’s enjoyable, it’s worthwhile, it’s occasionally heartbreaking and it will become expensive. Don’t let any of that put you off, just prepare yourself.

    3. Finance. Unless your idea is so good and so well received that a Publisher takes you on, you are going to be on your own. This is a very hard route to go down and you must question your motive in publishing before going down that route. Let’s say we’re looking at a photo-rich book which benefits from quality printing, in hardback. I doubt you would get 500 printed for anything less than £16 per copy.

    4. Marketing. It is so easy to fail in this area. Your advertising costs would be heavy and remember you only have a limited audience. This is a specialised book, not a mainstream novel which could sell hundreds of thousands of copies.

    5. Discipline. You need to be disciplined to achieve this. It will be a thousand times harder than anything you have ever done in your life so far. You have to achieve more than a degree of accuracy in your output. Remember, you will be writing about men and women to whom we owe our futures.

    6. Criticism. If you publish anything you will be criticised, both by those who know less about the subject than you and by those who know considerably more. work out which is which and learn from your mistakes. Enjoy any paraise that comes your way. Don’t let it came you too overconfident. Always remember the next pitfall is only ever just around the corner.

    7. Above all, enjoy the whole experience. It is likely that you will meet people who will illuminate your life in ways you never imagined. A veteran in his eighties telephoned me one evening, we’d never spoken before but he knew of my research. We spoke for two hours and he told me a heart rending story he had never told anyone before, not even his wife of 55 years. You are in a position of some privelege and also great trust. Be aware of your responsibilities to men such as these and never let them down.

    But having said all that? Go for it. But take it seriously and be prepared to learn from others. No-one here really has an axe to grind with you, Ollie. But the way in which you seem unwilling or unable to take advantage of the good advice you have been offered leaves you open to ridicule. You have questioned or disregarded comments from people on here who rightly can be considered experts in their field of interest. That is not a character trait which endears you to those you seem dismissive if. Much of this expertise has been gained from many years of experience and tempered by the school of hard knocks. Just learn and don’t make the mistakes others are warning you of, because they, and myself, have often learned the hard way.

    I wish you well in your endeavours Ollie, come along to OW on Sunday and we can have a chat.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Coventry to err…. Coventry. (Part 1) #416734
    kev35
    Participant

    Terrific post Kev.

    East Kirkby’s Lancaster next?

    Moggy

    Rob.

    Thank you. I have been aboard ‘Just Jane’ but if you’re offering to pay for a taxy run I would happily oblige and write a ‘trip report’ for you.

    Thank you to everyone for the kind comments. Although I enjoy taking photographs of commercial aircraft I have to say that the flight in the DC-3 makes my other flights pale into insignificance. It is a throwback to a golden age and one instantly feels transported back in time. It is, without doubt, the most pleasant of experiences and one I would heartily reccomend.

    I have a number of pictures of other aircraft of the AA fleet and will post them here if anyone is interested and/or has no objections.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Coventry to err…. Coventry. (Part 1) #416737
    kev35
    Participant

    Excellent stuff – something i’d like to try myself, however ‘WC’s training mishap doesn’t warrent it to be torched in my honest opinion!!!!

    Preston. Torching the 360 would have had a three-fold purpose.

    1. It would have reopened the airport earlier.

    2. The flames would have generated some much needed warmth on a bitterly cold day.

    3. I would have saved the petrol consumed on the return the next day.

    In all seriousness the unexpected can and will happen. No-one wanted that to happen, least of all the operators of ‘WC! It was all sorted as expediently as could be managed. I had two fantastic days out, which culminated in a dream flight in a 62 year old aircraft. It’s somewhat sobering to think that that aircraft had been flying for 18 years when I was born, and had survived a war.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Possibility of flights from LBA to India? #590380
    kev35
    Participant

    I suppose that 79m does make a certain difference to aircraft types?

    It might make a difference to the pucker factor of the flight crews.

    Perhaps someone more mathematically minded could work out just how long it would take for say, a 767, to eat up those 79 metres at Vone?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Coventry to err…. Coventry. (Part 1) #416749
    kev35
    Participant

    Part Two (For those who have not expired of terminal boredom…)

    Sunday 18th. Still cold, if not a little colder but not as bright. Arrived at 10:00 am for a 12:00 departure. Very nice, except there was a slight technical problem with G-AMRA’s starboard engine. After a short search, the problem was located….

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/engineer.jpg

    We were due on the second flight of the day which, by the time G-AMRA was serviceable, gave us a departure time of 13:30. Here’s a couple of shots of G-AMRA starting and taxying for the first flight.

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/nose.jpg

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/start.jpg

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/nose2.jpg

    Boarding was carried out on a first come first served basis. Dad and I took two seats over the port wing. This DC-3 is configured for 36 pax in nine rows of four. Comfortably settled in, the crew were very light hearted and entertaining and we were given our safety briefing by Becky. Being a tail-dragger it seems a little strange to be sat in the aircraft with the floor at such a steep angle but it’s not uncomfortable or unpleasant.

    The somewhat recalcitrant starboard engine of earlier in the morning started first and the aircraft begins that peculiar trembling motion. Port engine started soon after and the vibration, almost a shiver, increases. The aircraft taxied forward and waddled out towards the runway. Being a single runway, this necessitated taxying virtually the length of the runway before turning for take off. On the way we passed one of Thomsonfly’s 737’s.

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/tfly.jpg

    Lined up on the runway and with both throttles pushed forward the aircraft becomes very lively indeed. The vibration increases considerably but not unpleasantly. It’s not long before the tail rises and then only a few seconds more before the mains leave the ground. Wheels tucked up and flaps decreasing it is a comfortable and steady climb to the operating height for the day of just 1500 feet. Our route is to take us over Kenilworth, Gaydon, Leamington and Warwick and is expected to take 20 minutes or so. A few shots from the air follow.

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/air2.jpg

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/air1.jpg

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/air3.jpg

    Over Warwick we descended to 500 feet and made some quiet steep turns to allow people to see this historic town. Any fears that I had that my Dad might not be enjoying himself were dispelled by the huge grin he was wearing. He especially enjoyed the steep turns. All too soon we were descending again on the approach to Coventry. Our journey in this beautiful 62 year old airframe was coming to a close. The landing was the smoothest I have ever experienced. Taxying back in my thoughts wondered to the crews and paratroops who flew these aircraft into combat and to the millions of passengers who have flown in the type over the last 70 years.

    All in all it is a fantastic experience. No wonder the aircraft has around 800 examples still airworthy. It just feels right. On leaving the aircraft my Dad’s first words were “When can we do it again?” One Christmas present I am sure he will remember. It seems likely we may get the chance to repeat the experience in April. Do a google search for Air Atlantique Classic Flight and that will keep you updated.

    Despite the delays, or maybe even because of them, Dad and I had a fantastic experience which we will both treasure. Thanks go to all at AACF for organising this event and making it such an interesting and special occasion.

    I will leave you with one final photograph. It is a shot of Dad and I taken by Becky (thanks Becky) at 1500 feet somewhere over Warwickshire, living our dream.

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/kev35_/happycampers.jpg

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Airport Photography #590877
    kev35
    Participant

    Last one military or ex military? Looks like hardstandings/dispersals on the loop to the right of the runway.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1357725
    kev35
    Participant

    Would Lankytim like to climb down off his high horse now. I merely asked Ollie how he intended to fit it all in. Now, speaking as someone who has written a published book I know it takes more than a couple of hours a week to produce something even vaguely acceptable. Any distractions such as work and normal life really do impinge on what is produced. It is a long, often tiresome and thankless task for which the rewards rarely match the effort. I merely questioned the feasibility and practicality of carrying out two enormous projects at once.

    However, it seems clear that you are yet another inhabitant of fantasy island, well meaning as you may be. People have offered streams of good advice to Ollie which, either through stupidity or arrogance he chooses to ignore.

    Come back when you have, as others have suggested, “grown up” a little.

    Regards,

    kev35 (Shall I expect the one week ban or something stronger?)

    in reply to: MAM in the snow #1357729
    kev35
    Participant

    Does whom great credit?

    MAM yes. But Malcolm and Gordon in particular. Was present most of the time XF382 was undergoing its re-paint and mini refurb, even contributed a bit to the scheme (as did our inimitable Albert). Saw nobody else but these two blokes working on it – before or since. It was not only the paint-job that was up-lifted, a fair amount of “containment” work was done on the systems and airframe as it was in a mess (including fixing the gyro gun-sight).

    This ‘frame will now survive another winter outside thanks to the work of these two blokes, survive and look good for next year’s ceremony (if the plan comes together).

    (Pic shows Gordon with 382)

    Les.

    Not wishing to tread on anyone’s toes here. I did credit all the Museum staff and volunteers. I may visit regularly but I don’t actually know anyone so don’t know who specifically does what in terms which type of work they carry out on which airframe.

    Do you think any of the outdoor airframes are particularly at risk if some work is not carried out to prevent deterioration in the near future? Does the Museum actively recruit volunteers and are there any particular skills or qualifications required to become a volunteer?

    I am genuinely impressed by the work which goes on there. Something new seems to be happening all the time and from the visitor’s point of view I think that is very important. it’s a friendly, relaxed, Museum which does everyone connected with it enormous credit.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: The ten worst Britons #1954069
    kev35
    Participant

    Grey Area.

    This “veneer of respectability” you attribute to Mosley. Would that apply equally to Winston Churchill who was an active supporter of the Eugenics Movement in the period shortly before the Great War?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #372857
    kev35
    Participant

    Grey Area.

    This “veneer of respectability” you attribute to Mosley. Would that apply equally to Winston Churchill who was an active supporter of the Eugenics Movement in the period shortly before the Great War?

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: General Discussion #372872
    kev35
    Participant

    If I remember correctly, Joyce had a British Passport which was in fact invalid because of the simple fact that on his declaration he stated he was born in the British Isles, when, as previously stated, he was American by birth. Therefore, it was suggested that the British Authorities could not try him for treason as he was not a British National and that in effect he was hanged becuse of an illegal declaration on his passport. Interestingly, when arrested, he was shot in the buttocks. he stood by his principles and never tried, during his trial, to deny his loyalty the the Third Reich.

    His wife, incidentally, could, and possibly should, have been tried, convicted and hanged for treason, but this never happened.

    Regards,

    kev35

    in reply to: The ten worst Britons #1954078
    kev35
    Participant

    If I remember correctly, Joyce had a British Passport which was in fact invalid because of the simple fact that on his declaration he stated he was born in the British Isles, when, as previously stated, he was American by birth. Therefore, it was suggested that the British Authorities could not try him for treason as he was not a British National and that in effect he was hanged becuse of an illegal declaration on his passport. Interestingly, when arrested, he was shot in the buttocks. he stood by his principles and never tried, during his trial, to deny his loyalty the the Third Reich.

    His wife, incidentally, could, and possibly should, have been tried, convicted and hanged for treason, but this never happened.

    Regards,

    kev35

Viewing 15 posts - 4,786 through 4,800 (of 8,395 total)