Model kits for me. Mainly military aircraft but the odd airliner crept in. Somehow they never looked as good when covered in gluey fingerprints! I still build kits now, and I’m not necessarily any better at it but I enjoy dabbling. My other big passion as a child was books, and if it was an aircraft book so much the better.
Regards,
kev35
Re: Re: man…
Keltic.
“One thing is governamental support of some European leaders, and other is what the majority of the population think. Our president walked shoulder with shoulder with GWB with a 91 per cent against.”
But that’s true everywhere isn’t it? Polls are notoriously unreliable and, unfortunately, can often be manipulated to the user’s advantage. You say 91% of the Spanish population were against the war but that’s not true is it? 91% of the sample interviewed may have been against the war but that’s not necessarily a true reflection of the wishes of the people. It may even have been more, but I think that is doubtful. It was the same in the UK. The Government held a vote in the House of Commons in support of the war. As we all know the vote was carried. But how can we be sure that our Members of Parliament represent our views honestly? The truth is we can’t. Cetainly my MP never asked me what I thought about any issue, and he was never available if you wanted to talk to him. The essential truth is that any country is only as democratic as its Government allows.
“And no single European country supported the war or don´t feel european.”
None of the people I know consider themselves to be European ahead of British and as we all know Britain supported the war. The percentage of people supporting the war differs depending who commissioned the polls.
Regards,
kev35
Re: Re: man…
Keltic.
“One thing is governamental support of some European leaders, and other is what the majority of the population think. Our president walked shoulder with shoulder with GWB with a 91 per cent against.”
But that’s true everywhere isn’t it? Polls are notoriously unreliable and, unfortunately, can often be manipulated to the user’s advantage. You say 91% of the Spanish population were against the war but that’s not true is it? 91% of the sample interviewed may have been against the war but that’s not necessarily a true reflection of the wishes of the people. It may even have been more, but I think that is doubtful. It was the same in the UK. The Government held a vote in the House of Commons in support of the war. As we all know the vote was carried. But how can we be sure that our Members of Parliament represent our views honestly? The truth is we can’t. Cetainly my MP never asked me what I thought about any issue, and he was never available if you wanted to talk to him. The essential truth is that any country is only as democratic as its Government allows.
“And no single European country supported the war or don´t feel european.”
None of the people I know consider themselves to be European ahead of British and as we all know Britain supported the war. The percentage of people supporting the war differs depending who commissioned the polls.
Regards,
kev35
Gaurav.
yes, not too far away is it? I have friends who live in Wolverhampton and I am a regular visitor to Cosford.
Regards,
kev35
Been on board the prototype they have at Duxford which looks far more interesting with all the electronic test equipment they have on board but have never flown on the aircraft.
Rehards,
kev35
Michael.
I don’t know very much about the technical aspects of operating an aircraft like Concorde but I would imagine the greatest costs are from fuel and maintenance. I very much doubt that swapping ‘champagne and caviar’ for beans on toast and a cup of tea would make that much difference to the profitability of the aircraft.. I would imagine that level of service was just a sop to encourage you that your flight was ‘something special.’
Regards,
kev35
Originally posted by T5
What I want to know is…HOW ON EARTH WILL WE COPE WITHOUT SUPERSONIC AIR TRAVEL?
Michael, unless you were a frequent flyer on Concorde I think most people will manage just fine. It was an elitist concept aimed at a minute fraction of the air-travelling public. And its inception condemned the TSR2 project to an early demise, an aircraft that would have been far more useful to the nation than seven airframes whose main role seems to have been to ensure the ‘class’ gap remained an unbreachable one.
Regards,
kev35
Hi, Ian.
from the people I’ve researched I can confirm that a considerable number of widows didn’t remarry. Often the bond was so strong that many couldn’t consider loving another person. This attitude was confirmed to me by the widow of an air-bomber killed on Lancaster ops in 1942. A number of this lady’s friends were also widowed and never remarried. Shortly before she died she told me she would be meeting her beloved ‘Alex’ soon and that he came to her in uniform telling her everything would be alright. Who am I to argue?
Don’t worry about the pre-war fascist connection. Look at the cause for which he gave his life.
Regards,
kev35
Can’t find a reference to X9817 in the OTU volume of Bomber Command Losses. Perhaps it was SOC as having reached the end of it’s airframe life.
Regards,
kev35
Hi, Ian.
If you are reasonably confident he was a Yorkshireman I would put something on the letters page of as many Yorkshire newspapers as you could find. That might give you a start.
A letter to the AHB including personal details or the Officers Records at the PMA might give you an abbreviated service record which may or may not confirm personal details. The addresses are below.
Air Historical Branch,
Ministry of Defence,
Building 266,
RAF Bentley Priory,
Stanmore,
Middlesex.
HA7 3HH tel: 0208-838-7839
Officer’s Records,
Personnel Management Agency,
Building 248a,
HQ RAF Personnel & Training Command,
RAF Innsworth,
Gloucestershire.
GL3 IE7. tel: 01452 712612 ext 7906.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
kev35
TTP.
“All I said after taking boatloads of crap from some of these guys,”
If an American says it it just has to be God’s Holy law if you’re not American it’s a boatload of crap. Your words, see above. Why can’t you try to discuss things with people without it degenerating into a slanging match?
“Your a better man thamn me if you can debate with these guys, it takes alot of patience, and lip-biting.”
It’s called tolerance and is something you seem totally devoid of. There are discussions on this board which take place between people from across the globe, and largely speaking they are constructive, informative and harmonious. But, let one person make a statement criticising America and all hell breaks loose.
“I came on this forum because I love the old war-birds and end up fighting with 19 year old Churchill wannabees from planetX”
In that case please allow me to direct you to the flypast forum where you will find many discussions revolving around old war-birds. Look forward to your input.
“Good luck SOC, I’ll lurk on the aviation sections, gotta work anyway for the next few days….keep up the good fight.”
And there we have it in a nutshell. TTP views discussion as a fight.
Regards,
kev35
TTP.
“All I said after taking boatloads of crap from some of these guys,”
If an American says it it just has to be God’s Holy law if you’re not American it’s a boatload of crap. Your words, see above. Why can’t you try to discuss things with people without it degenerating into a slanging match?
“Your a better man thamn me if you can debate with these guys, it takes alot of patience, and lip-biting.”
It’s called tolerance and is something you seem totally devoid of. There are discussions on this board which take place between people from across the globe, and largely speaking they are constructive, informative and harmonious. But, let one person make a statement criticising America and all hell breaks loose.
“I came on this forum because I love the old war-birds and end up fighting with 19 year old Churchill wannabees from planetX”
In that case please allow me to direct you to the flypast forum where you will find many discussions revolving around old war-birds. Look forward to your input.
“Good luck SOC, I’ll lurk on the aviation sections, gotta work anyway for the next few days….keep up the good fight.”
And there we have it in a nutshell. TTP views discussion as a fight.
Regards,
kev35
No, but….
Lancman,
have you an approximate time-frame? If so, I’ll check Bomber Command Losses for you.
Regards,
kev35
Sauron.
You just don’t understand do you? I’m not anti-American, just not too happy with some things America is doing at the moment. I just don’t understand how it advances an argument to cast aspersions about your opponent, that’s all. Garry argues against TTP’s views on America’s history, therefore he must be gay?
Regards,
kev35
Sauron.
You just don’t understand do you? I’m not anti-American, just not too happy with some things America is doing at the moment. I just don’t understand how it advances an argument to cast aspersions about your opponent, that’s all. Garry argues against TTP’s views on America’s history, therefore he must be gay?
Regards,
kev35