dark light

atc pal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 589 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: At least 130 killed in Madrid train blasts #1968058
    atc pal
    Participant

    Had our silence – again!- here today (like 11’th of September).

    But one problem remains, Spain. You were bombed (by whome?), You pull out of Iraq?

    How in H*ll are “we” gonna combat any terrorists from now?

    Thank You! See you in Copenhagen, Denmark, on the 14’th of May for the Crown Prince wedding.

    Thank God HRH Frederik is a Danish Navy SEAL, so he can jump in the harbour with Mary from Tasmania.

    (Hey! Al Q. Remember Poland is in Iraq as well.)

    Frustrated!

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #635523
    atc pal
    Participant

    WD – if it was at Toledo Express Airport you “snapped” the A-7 and F-100, maybe it was “historic” aircraft from Ohio Air National Guard? (112th Fighter Squadron/ 180th Fighter Group) They flew both before the present F-16.

    However there is a private F-100F N26AZ, registered to El Greco Air Inc. El Paso, Tx. (David Tokoph, Aero Zambia CEO). That’s, as you say, a real private jet, but with a backseat for the wife! Unlike the D-model you photographed.

    (Sorry for the scanning. It is from a Danish book and the photographer is James C. Bates)

    Best Regards

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #635544
    atc pal
    Participant

    The designation changed in 1977 from VC-9C to C-9C. One C-9A (67-22586) was lost in a mishap at Scott Field 16’th of September 1971.

    I read in a magazine that all the C-9’s are retiring. It is also quite noisy with those old JT8’s

    Best Regards

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #635553
    atc pal
    Participant

    Found it! On 29’th of January 2003 the VIP-one made circuit training here. “Tune 75” c/n 71-0882.

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #635646
    atc pal
    Participant

    The C-9C (3 acquired in 1973) was originally known as VC-9C. Operated from Andrews in blue and white livery.

    The C-9A (DC-9-30) was the Nightingale for medevac. There were 21. 20 with a red cross on the tail. The last one was a VIP transport for Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) from Chievres Belgium.

    The above mentioned book by R. F. Dorr has many “gems” about the different presidents. Carter had the VC-137 renamed C-137 to be less ostentatious. The colour scheme was also toned down.

    in reply to: Pictures Pictures Pictures #635735
    atc pal
    Participant

    C-20C Gulfstream 4’s that follow Air Force One is emergency war-order aircraft to move high ranking personnel and the President in event of a nuclear conflict. No glass cockpit but old type round dials to withstand EMP.

    “Air Force One” by Robert F. Dorr

    in reply to: A happy F-16 #2665092
    atc pal
    Participant

    kfadrat

    It’s a “captive” Sidewinder (I don’t have the designation). Only carrying the seeker head. Basically “water pipes” behind. So you can get the correct “tone” etc. in the cockpit.

    Best regards

    in reply to: April Flypast: USAF Skyraider article #1558608
    atc pal
    Participant

    I just had to know how that cathedral looked!

    Also try

    http://www.skyraider.org/

    One is a “virtual” book – very interesting.

    The other has got engine noise, radio tapes from different battles and rescues. (I haven’t tried them all yet)

    Digressing try PPRUNE – Military aircrew – “Did you fly the Vulcan?” a lot about the V-force and tactics.

    in reply to: April Flypast: USAF Skyraider article #1558630
    atc pal
    Participant

    Oh yes – the A-1 lifting like a B-17 – on one engine.

    Here is a chilling acount of US NAVY Skyraiders:

    http://www.danford.net/toss.htm

    Carrying a Nuke to Sevastopol
    “Like I said, I was a 24-year-old Marine lieutenant at the time, and I wasn’t afraid of anything”–Jay Velie, Dallas, Texas
    What should you fear? Well, see how this fits:

    (This article began as a study of lofting or tossing nuclear weapons.I became fascinated with the notion of using the prop-driven Skyraider for this purpose, and the story evolved into an account of what it would have been like to drive this WWII-era plane to Sevastopol on the first day of World War III. The article published in Foundation magazine of the Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola in its Fall 1999 issue. — Dan Ford)

    in reply to: A happy F-16 #2665543
    atc pal
    Participant

    – and airborne. Not smoking like an A-model with water injection.
    (and not so many “white knuckles”, I imagine?)

    Is “Boomer” still with us?

    in reply to: A happy F-16 #2665552
    atc pal
    Participant

    Halfway on the 10.000 fett runway (no wind)

    in reply to: A happy F-16 #2665560
    atc pal
    Participant

    While were at it (scanning) here is one of the KC-135E’s taking off (USAF Reserve, Selfridge)

    in reply to: Wright Brothers #1558656
    atc pal
    Participant

    From the “Virginian Pilot”, (“12 pages in two parts”, “True to the Democratic Party in victory or defeat”, Norfolk Va. Friday December 18, 1803, Three cents per copy):

    “Flying machine soars 3 miles in teeth of high wind over sand hills and waves at Kitty Hawk on Carolina Coast.

    No balloon attached to aid it.

    Three years of hard, secret work by two Ohio brothers crowned with success.

    Accomplished what Langley failed at.

    With man as passenger huge machine flew like bird under perfect control.

    Box kite principle with two propellers.

    The problem of aerial navigation without the use of a balloon has been solved at last”.

    And what is right here in our backyard:

    A company called:
    Curtiss Wright (!), (European Division)

    Best regards

    in reply to: Wright Brothers #1558899
    atc pal
    Participant

    Wilbur died from Typhus in 1912, 45 years old.

    Orville in 1948, 78.

    The crippling patent battle was solved when USA needed to build many planes for World War One. The Government bought the patent.

    Orville sold the aircraft factory in 1915 for 250.000$.

    In 1901 the American astrophycisist Simon newcomb concluded that it would be impossible to build a flying machine heavier than air. Adm. Melville, chief engineer of the US Navy, also saw the difficulties, and that a prototype would cost more than the most expensive warship (it would today!?)

    Octave Chanute – only by united efforts of many men, and a lot of money. (He later worked with the Wrights)

    When Langleys Aerodrome crashed into the Potomac for the second time from a houseboat (he didn’t believe in “keep it simple s…..”) the US Government withdrew all support. N Y Times editorial: “The flying machine might be evolved …in from one to ten mio. years”. Nine days before 17’th December 2003!

    11 years later the Aerodrome was completely rebuilt – yes, by Curtiss – and the Smithsonian and flown twice from a lake (5 seconds). And exhibited as the first working aircraft!

    (From Bill Gunston: Plane Speaking and a Danish book from 2003)

    Best regards

    in reply to: Wright Brothers #1558950
    atc pal
    Participant

    There were many patent battles, and the story of the Smithsonian backing Langley s Aerodrome. The original Wright then went to London until after the second World War, so disappointed was the Wrights – or was that after one of them died?

    Anyway here is a replica of Glen Curtiss pusher D from Old Rhinebeck. He “invented” the ailerons to circumvent the wingwarping patent of Wright. Note that the ailerons are mounted between the wings. (a little hard to see here)
    The Wrights also had ailerons, but on the wings.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 589 total)