Page 115 – Key Publishing

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 2,193 total)

← 1 2 3 … 114 115 116 … 145 146 147 →

Author

Posts
February 14, 2004 at 7:53 pm in reply to: uh oh- Israel highly unsatisfied with F-16I's radar….da da daaaaa #2688759

google
Participant

They paid a lot for the exclusive rights to that radar? I assume the radar is ONLY for the IAF?

February 14, 2004 at 5:56 pm in reply to: uh oh- Israel highly unsatisfied with F-16I's radar….da da daaaaa #2688801

google
Participant

Is the radar to be solely used on the F-16I, or will it be used on other aircraft as well? Anyone know what the UAE Block 60s are getting?

February 14, 2004 at 4:51 pm in reply to: USAF considering mounting BATs in place of 105mms on AC-130 #2688818

google
Participant

Or, make a rock/pebble launcher gun- ammo would be plentiful, cheap, and deadly.:)

February 14, 2004 at 2:13 pm in reply to: uh oh- Israel highly unsatisfied with F-16I's radar….da da daaaaa #2688894

google
Participant

It would probably violate the warranty, if there is one.:D

February 13, 2004 at 11:10 pm in reply to: uh oh- Israel highly unsatisfied with F-16I's radar….da da daaaaa #2689105

google
Participant

Hmm, then they must be pretty efficient with their limited budget size.

February 13, 2004 at 10:57 pm in reply to: uh oh- Israel highly unsatisfied with F-16I's radar….da da daaaaa #2689113

google
Participant

Anyone know what the conversion rate is from Israeli currency to US dollars?

February 13, 2004 at 10:17 pm in reply to: USAF considering mounting BATs in place of 105mms on AC-130 #2689131

google
Participant

Well, in return, the Japanese tried tying incendiary devices to balloons, which they floated over in hopes of setting forest fires in Oregon or Washington state. I think one of them killed a family of 6, and that was about it…

February 13, 2004 at 6:41 pm in reply to: USAF considering mounting BATs in place of 105mms on AC-130 #2689188

google
Participant

This is a bat.

This is a BAT

http://www.systima.com/ViperStrikeDef-DefenseUpdate.pdf

The munition to be mounted, Viper Strike, “is a variant of Northrop Grumman’s Brilliant Anti-Armor (also known as the Brilliant Anti-Tank, BAT) submunition with a semi-active laser seeker that enables it to go after moving as well as stationary ground targets.”

February 13, 2004 at 5:38 pm in reply to: How sweet is this baby? #2689232

google
Participant

Hmm, so Jane’s used Chris’ pic without giving him credit?

February 12, 2004 at 11:27 pm in reply to: F/A-22 & RAH-66 Programmes Still Under Threat? #2689519

google
Participant

That’s unfortunate. What will they use to fight the Incredible Hulk then?

February 12, 2004 at 11:26 pm in reply to: How sweet is this baby? #2689521

google
Participant

The fact that you guys know this much is scary. 😉

February 12, 2004 at 11:24 pm in reply to: Anyone have more info on Soviet N007 flying boat? #2689523

google
Participant

Thanks! Flanker_man.

Much obliged.:)

February 11, 2004 at 11:52 pm in reply to: Air Forces Special Operations Units #2690134

google
Participant

Originally posted by ForkTailedDevil
Its just a bit blurred because his foots moving and the cameras shutter speed musn’t be very high.Nothing more intersting than that.The foot is a bit bluky though because the NBC suit has foot bag things on it to seal it better.And one last thing the MG42 is the joint ancestor of the G3/CETME rifles.

I thought it was the camera too, but his right shoe appears just as bulky as well.

February 11, 2004 at 10:36 pm in reply to: Air Forces Special Operations Units #2690149

google
Participant

anti-mine protection? I dunno…

February 11, 2004 at 10:33 pm in reply to: General Discussion #396599

google
Participant

well, it was fun chatting with you Sauron. No hard feelings, it’s only politics.:D

Sorry if I got carried away at times…

cheers,

google
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 2,193 total)

← 1 2 3 … 114 115 116 … 145 146 147 →