dark light

google

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,116 through 2,130 (of 2,193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #421699
    google
    Participant

    Dying in a submarine has got to be one of the worst ways to go out. At least on a ship or plane, you could jump or eject and hope for the best int the sea or in the air, but def. not at 20,000 leagues under the sea.

    poor souls, whether they be Chinese, Russian, or any other nationality, they’re all humans.

    Which brings me to wonder, why do ppl like being submariners? having to stay below the surface for months at a time smelling recycled farts, that would be enough to drive me away.

    in reply to: Ming sub 361 accident; 70 dead #1989324
    google
    Participant

    Dying in a submarine has got to be one of the worst ways to go out. At least on a ship or plane, you could jump or eject and hope for the best int the sea or in the air, but def. not at 20,000 leagues under the sea.

    poor souls, whether they be Chinese, Russian, or any other nationality, they’re all humans.

    Which brings me to wonder, why do ppl like being submariners? having to stay below the surface for months at a time smelling recycled farts, that would be enough to drive me away.

    in reply to: General Discussion #422451
    google
    Participant

    No no, I was just worried I was spending too much time on forums in general. But no need to delete my account, I’ll just post less.

    in reply to: Question for Admin #1989722
    google
    Participant

    No no, I was just worried I was spending too much time on forums in general. But no need to delete my account, I’ll just post less.

    in reply to: General Discussion #422655
    google
    Participant

    Haha, I don’t remember what airline it was, but the European nature of this board is definitely having its subtle influences on me!

    in reply to: I had a dream #1989856
    google
    Participant

    Haha, I don’t remember what airline it was, but the European nature of this board is definitely having its subtle influences on me!

    in reply to: General Discussion #422657
    google
    Participant

    Yeah, I know, weird huh? We were all heading to some place in Europe. I think it was Belgium.

    in reply to: I had a dream #1989862
    google
    Participant

    Yeah, I know, weird huh? We were all heading to some place in Europe. I think it was Belgium.

    in reply to: General Discussion #424665
    google
    Participant

    Happy Easter all!

    Pray for peace.

    in reply to: Happy Easter everyone! #1991024
    google
    Participant

    Happy Easter all!

    Pray for peace.

    in reply to: General Discussion #425258
    google
    Participant

    Thanks Garry- would you happen to know what the blast radius of a single 122mm Grad is? I estimated from a Vietnam War photo for it to be about ~4m radius.

    Yah, the Russians had a S-23 M-1955 180mm gun howitzer, you’re absolutely correct. Monster of a gun, adapted from a pre-war naval gun I believe. One was captured by the Israelis from the Egyptians.

    in reply to: Question about artillery shells #1991431
    google
    Participant

    Thanks Garry- would you happen to know what the blast radius of a single 122mm Grad is? I estimated from a Vietnam War photo for it to be about ~4m radius.

    Yah, the Russians had a S-23 M-1955 180mm gun howitzer, you’re absolutely correct. Monster of a gun, adapted from a pre-war naval gun I believe. One was captured by the Israelis from the Egyptians.

    in reply to: General Discussion #425419
    google
    Participant

    Ah, I haven’t counted the ballistic missiles yet. I’m not sure if NK would use those in a retaliatory strike, well, perhaps they would use some, but not all. Probably not with a high explosive warhead, but a CW one. Ah great, more calculations to do.

    regards,

    google

    in reply to: Question about artillery shells #1991520
    google
    Participant

    Ah, I haven’t counted the ballistic missiles yet. I’m not sure if NK would use those in a retaliatory strike, well, perhaps they would use some, but not all. Probably not with a high explosive warhead, but a CW one. Ah great, more calculations to do.

    regards,

    google

    in reply to: General Discussion #425434
    google
    Participant

    Hi Alastair,

    Thanks for the reply. From my initial research so far, the media reports of 500,000 shells an hour on Seoul are grossly exaggerated. Only the Koksan 170mm gun has the range with a 60km RAP shell, and the 240mmMLRS may just be able to make it.

    google

Viewing 15 posts - 2,116 through 2,130 (of 2,193 total)