dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: No more dH Moth Rallies #884933
    Mike J
    Participant

    The thread title is a little misleading…

    Not at all.

    The communiqué from the Club makes it very clear that the Moth Rally, on the scale of those of the past, will not be happening again.

    in reply to: More from AAIB on Shoreham #884968
    Mike J
    Participant

    Hmm. It doesn’t tell us much, does it?

    It tells us that operation of historic jets is only to become more difficult, especially in the light of Martin-Baker’s recent decision to cease supporting legacy seats which are no longer in military service.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #885369
    Mike J
    Participant

    I don’t believe that FL has EVER sold out, unlike the occasional September show at Duxford

    in reply to: Pampa's usual stuff. Stuka this time. #885748
    Mike J
    Participant

    Matt, I fear your extensive research may have been in vain on this occasion. The number of views of his posts on this forum are of no relevance to him whatsoever, the only thing he is is interested in are click-throughs to view his own site.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #886274
    Mike J
    Participant

    My guess would be ARCo for an annual

    in reply to: Scottish Spitfire Grounded #886288
    Mike J
    Participant

    No

    in reply to: XH558 and G-VLCN Registered trade marks #886724
    Mike J
    Participant

    The Vulcan was never supposed to be transferred to a profit making company..

    That’s okay then, because the chance of it ever turning a profit is somewhat less than that of Jose Mourinho sending Roman Abramovich a Chritmas Card.

    in reply to: Enjoy – "The German" movie. Yet again. #886729
    Mike J
    Participant

    Any clue as to what we’re supposed to be enjoying, before I click on a random link, please?

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster sneek peek.. #887084
    Mike J
    Participant

    I think that’s it, he says those photos are part 2 of 2 sets

    in reply to: Airworthy Seafire VP 441's museum now open to the public #887093
    Mike J
    Participant

    It is very much an Ezell rebuild, with innovative engineering solutions for solving shortages of ‘weird’ British parts and making the aircraft more operable in the US environment. Perfectly legal under the FAA’s Experimental category, impossible to certify on a CAA permit.

    in reply to: OLD WARDEN 2015 #887551
    Mike J
    Participant

    Indeed. Seems such a long time ago now.

    in reply to: B29 'Doc' (And Other B29s) #887678
    Mike J
    Participant

    WHO are notorious for plagiarizing other sources, often well out of date, and rehashing it under their own byline as ‘news’

    in reply to: Airworthy Seafire VP 441's museum now open to the public #887699
    Mike J
    Participant

    Is it still airworthy? i was under the impression that it had been parked for several years now

    in reply to: OLD WARDEN 2015 #887725
    Mike J
    Participant

    R4118 has spent time there between events in the past

    in reply to: RAF Mustang MK III project for sale #887739
    Mike J
    Participant

    Why?

    The present system works, and makes it viable to ‘rebuild’ aircraft as they have commercial value afterwards. Just lookn at the ‘original’ Mk I Spitfire auctioned earlier this year.

    Without this, as modern replicas, the value would be less than the cost to build, and we would have no Mk I Spitfires, P-51Bs and Cs, etc.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 3,162 total)