dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #882694
    Mike J
    Participant

    So are you saying that any airport with a road that runs along the approack should be closed down? Or that they should temporarily suspend operations according to traffic conditions? Or that the M25 should be closed as it is dangerous to have traffic near an airport? I’m struggling to see what point you’re trying to make here.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #882790
    Mike J
    Participant

    And the risk from a single-engined vintage aircraft flying high-engergy aerobatics at low level is the same as a multi-engined airliner making an approach to land, is it?

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #882800
    Mike J
    Participant

    I wasn’t aware that airshows were held at Heathrow

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #883614
    Mike J
    Participant

    If there were some guaranteed flying, maybe a little extra might be acceptable. It’s not guaranteed though, and there
    would be nothing else to warrant the extra cost.

    You still haven’t explained how you expect the organisers to guarantee the flying? Perhaps by erecting a giant umbrella and windbreak around the airfield and surrounding area, so they have an ‘indoors if wet’ option?

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884145
    Mike J
    Participant

    You are living in a fantasy world…

    …in common with most of the posters on this thread.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884581
    Mike J
    Participant

    So you expect the IWM to guarantee the weather?

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884594
    Mike J
    Participant

    Why?

    Plenty of other events, from sporting to music to airshows, are all-ticket and have been for years. Nobody is forcing you to go, if you don’t want to take the risk, don’t buy a ticket.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884691
    Mike J
    Participant

    So it’s the people who benefit by attending the venue who are expected to pay for it.

    What a curious business idea. I can’t see it catching on.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884703
    Mike J
    Participant

    Yes, you’re quite right, pure greed. They are using it to pay for their holiday homes in the Bahamas and the annual replacement of their Aston Martins. Perish the thought that they should try to generate some more income from their customers to help offset the swingeing cuts in Government funding they are experiencing.

    in reply to: Lancaster Legend #884719
    Mike J
    Participant

    Legend?
    Cees

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legend

    “a story coming down from the past; especially : one popularly regarded as historical although not verifiable”

    “a popular myth of recent origin”

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #884721
    Mike J
    Participant

    In which case if they charge extra to see flying [on the Friday] they will HAVE to provide flying.

    How do you work that one out? The IWM can set their own admission fees as they think fit, and are under no obligation to provide anything additional in return. If you don’t want to pay the requested fee, don’t go. Simples.

    in reply to: Hunter WN904 #884881
    Mike J
    Participant

    According to the history on the Sywell website, it went to Waterbeach in 1989

    http://www.sywellaerodrome.co.uk/museum-exhibits-hunter.php

    in reply to: More from AAIB on Shoreham #884883
    Mike J
    Participant

    The mainstream media have already started…

    The jet that crashed during the Shoreham air show had expired parts and a technical manual that was out-of date, investigators say.

    http://www.itv.com/news/2015-12-21/shoreham-air-crash-jet-had-out-of-date-parts/

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Airframes For Sale #884903
    Mike J
    Participant

    It takes ages to sell Hurricanes, the HAC one has been on the market for years and it took ages to sell the AFC example. Why this is, is anyones guess.

    Spitfire snobbery

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Airframes For Sale #884905
    Mike J
    Participant

    Dear Friends,

    I have been made aware of a number of comments being posted through social media about the proposed sale of a part of the
    Hangar 11 Collection and I decided best to lay out the facts from my standpoint.

    I started the collection in 1999 and since, we have built up an enviable set of amazing flying, active warbirds each unique in their own way. Personally, I have flown some 2000 warbird hours and too many hundreds of air displays to remember, over the last 15 years or so. Fact is that I really do have the Tee shirt and so many wonderful memories that will never be equalled in aviation.
    However, the Hangar 11 Collection is a tough business to run , in organisational terms, in financial terms and most of all in emotional terms. It’s rather a drain to be honest and I am looking to reduce my workload as I am struggling to keep up with family commitments, work commitments and also to find the resources to complete our unique MK IX Russian Spitfire PT879.

    So a very hard decision was made to reduce the collection down to the pair of P51 Mustang and MK XI Spitfire and to concentrate on completing PT879, for which we need room in the hangar. I will of course carry on with my airshow work but frankly it isn’t a quick process to sell aircraft of this type, so I am not counting on any disruption to our 2016 season. We are very relaxed sellers and are under no pressure until the right home is found for the P40 and Hurribomber.

    Hope this helps to allay your fears and responds to the many emails I have received to date.
    Happy Xmas and a peaceful new Year to all my friends and followers.
    Fly safe
    Peter”

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 3,162 total)