dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #890529
    Mike J
    Participant

    The show is now fully sold out both days. It will be interesting to see how rigorous the attempts at enforcement of the field closures are – there were noticeably less people in the fields at the July show this year.

    in reply to: Stow Maries Fly-in #890675
    Mike J
    Participant

    “Buy on line to avoid disappointment” isn’t the same thing as “advance tickets only”

    in reply to: Stow Maries Fly-in #890691
    Mike J
    Participant

    Are you sure it was advance ticket only? I have been to a number of events at Stow and been able to pay on the gate at all of them, without exception.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #892220
    Mike J
    Participant

    He had another display scheduled (Bournemouth, I believe) straight after Shoreham

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Tempest V Restoration Walk Around #892538
    Mike J
    Participant

    I’d love to see you make a valid economic case for that, with a potential market for an absolute maximum of one or two other customers, more probably none.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #892680
    Mike J
    Participant

    Two crucial pieces of information though. Height over the top of approx 2,600 ft at an IAS of 100 kts.

    It doesn’t say that. It says that the maximum height that was recorded by radar was 2,600 feet, on a system which did not take continuous readings. Not quite the same thing.

    in reply to: Hunter Flying Again Now #893390
    Mike J
    Participant

    Unfortunately with the Shoreham accident it becomes four aircraft losses . In terms of a percentage of the total numbers that have flown in U.K civil hands it’s a high accident rate.

    The US experience is similar, with seven airframe losses (five of them fatal) reported by the NTSB since 2000. A total of around 16 Hunters (almost all of them ex-Swiss examples on government contract work) are still active according to the FAA database.

    Mike J
    Participant

    ^^^ Desperate attempt to inject some aviation content into this thread 🙂 ^^^

    in reply to: Hunter Flying Again Now #894122
    Mike J
    Participant

    Indeed. They fall under the auspices of the MAA rather than the CAA. The MAA have not deemed it necessary to ground any Hunters, or have any specific inspections undertaken, nor have the FAA in the US (where about 15 are also being operated on contract to the military). Read into that what you will.

    in reply to: Hunter Flying Again Now #894232
    Mike J
    Participant

    The Scampton-based ones were never grounded

    in reply to: OLD WARDEN 2015 #895578
    Mike J
    Participant

    What happened to the “I’m going home in a minute” at Duxford this morning DCW? 😉

    in reply to: 'Action Stations' ceased trading? #895898
    Mike J
    Participant

    I don’t think I could think of a worse camera ship than a Rapide if I spent a year trying (and yes, I have used one as such)

    in reply to: Canadian Beaufighter Mk 10 #896240
    Mike J
    Participant

    A very sore point. The Canadians were extremely unimpressed that the Beaufighter was supplied to them by the RAF Museum (an exchange deal with the Bolingbroke now in Hendon IIRC) with no engines or cowlings. Their response was to park it outside for the next 30 years.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #896472
    Mike J
    Participant

    The days in the US of taking your British Warbird down to the paint shop, proffering a couple of period images and saying ‘paint like that’ were coming to end as the millennium rolled up.

    It wasn’t all that long ago that the CAF Wildcat was painted in that dreadful pseudo-FAA scheme based on a single profile drawing in a book 🙁

    Mike J
    Participant

    Don’t go there. Please. Not even remotely funny. 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 3,162 total)