I wonder how long before the money for hangar rent runs out
Oh, I’m sure they have. That doesn’t change the fact that it was specifically stated in the lottery bid that it would be retired to a National museum (Duxford) when its flying days were over.
Presumably the fact that it was specifically stated as part of the grant of (not inconsiderable) Lottery funding that it would be retired to Duxford on retirement has now been conveniently brushed under the carpet.
And the chance not to have the Lancaster with the 2 others was idiotic as its the only airfield in the world they could have done it.
Seriously?
Have you been in AirSpace lately? Counted the airframes that would need to be moved to get the Lancaster out of the far back corner (including the Sunderland, which is mounted on a fixed frame, not on beaching gear)?
I’m sure there must be a simple solution to the owl issue. I hear they taste like chicken.
I would suggest that Tango Charlie has a keen interest in the subject of the strength of Proctor glue joints too! 😉
Currently at Compton Abbas I believe
I’m sure Mr Labouchere knows what he is doing.
It has not been refabriced. It has already been annualled, had a fresh Permit issued, and been delivered to its new owner.
Stan, the aircraft is a Mk III with wartime history as a crew taxi for the ATA, based at Thame.
From a personal point of view I like the civil scheme, but if you are planning to punt it around for show bookings you will probably find that it is more attractive to organisers as a military-schemed ‘ATA taxi’ and so would probably generate more bookings.
Looks to have been handled very professionally, and with a little bit of luck involved in that they were very close to base – I’m sure we all remember the recent Liberty Belle B-17 and French B-25 losses. I’m very conscious of the fact that the Lancaster went to Holland just a few days beforehand.
Oh, don’t get me wrong, it is an excellent book, I’m just sad that it is a missed opportunity to do as thorough a job as they did with the Miles types. There are a lot more excellent photos of the pre-war (and wartime) types around, the Mew Gull section of the book in particular I felt to be particularly thin, and hat on the Q6s. Still, it is better than what we’ve had in the past, Percival types have been woefully under represented in print up to now.
It is just that I could quite happily take a razor blade to my copy and use the last 2/3 of it for lighting fires with, or some other useful purpose. 🙁
Has the Canberra restoration been abandoned now? They were advertising in the magazines, appealing for money specifically for it, quite recently.
The first third of the book is great, then the rest of it is cluttered up with those nasty tin aeroplanes that Percival, later Hunting, and then BAC made after the war. A wasted opportunity, a shame they didn’t split the coverage in the same way as for their excellent series of Miles books rather than cover all types on one volume. The amount of space wasted by individual histories of every Prentice, Prince, Pembroke, Provost and JP airframe produced severely limits the value of the book to me, as the sections (and photo coverage) on the pre-war types is severely truncated as a result.