Believe me, there is a huge amount of work going on, particularly between the Historic Aircraft Association and the CAA, on this very subject, and very real progress is being made.
What utter garbage. But then unless you’re a complete idiot, you must know that.
What part of my statement is factually incorrect?
People will eventually run Jaguars, Tornados, Hawks, maybe even Harriers but none of them are really as ingrained in the public imagination.
If you mean ‘fly’ rather than ‘run’, I’d say that most on your list are highly unlikely, at least in the UK
The most over-rated aircraft in history. Famous only for spending most of the 1960s sitting on the ground at bases in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire while its crews drank tea and played cards, and for managing to almost completely miss Port Stanley runway with all 21 bombs dropped. To listen to the nonsense spouted by its supporters, you’d think it was the most significant aeroplane in history.
…could another Vulcan be returned to airworthyness?
What an awful thought! 🙁
Actually, I’d say quite the opposite. The bredth of Facebook, in terms of historic aviation, is massive. Here, if you’re looking for anything pre-1939, it is very, very limited. It does take some time to navigate your way through the dross on Facebook, but the amount of information there once you start to delve, and the useful contacts to be made there, is simply staggering.
Agreed, his escapades at ‘Burning Man’ this year provided an endless source of entertainment! 🙂
Sold to Paul Allen some years back, it is currently under restoration in an undisclosed location, with a confidentiality agreement in effect with the restorer (as is the case with all of Allen’s ongoing restorations).
Just as a hint for anyone thinking of giving Facebook a go, if a group has ‘Spitfire’, ‘Lancaster’ or ‘Mosquito’ in the title, it is likely to be populated by a high proportion of clueless idiots. As with evey rule, there are exceptions to this.
It depends very much on the group. Some, as you say, are started, regulated and populated by morons. It is very easy and quick to find out which ones these are, and it only takes a second or two to hit the ‘leave group’ button. Some are administered and populated by pilots, restorers and historians and can be an incredibly useful resource, especially as the majority of such people have been driven away from forums such as this one over the years. Then there are the many pages for individual resorations, museums and operators, regularly updated – again, a hugely useful resource. You just need to pick and chose which groups you join and which pages you follow. Oh, and try to avoid engaging with the mass of idiots that Facebook attracts! 🙂
Oh, and don’t post any photos that you want to retain any sort of control over future usage of, ‘Copyright’ seems to be an alien concept to most Facebook users.
What a great idea to sell fuel!
What a helpful post!
What’s declining on this forum, Bruce? Please expand
A vast amount of content (photos, news, restoration reports) is now appearing on Facebook. A decade ago, they would have appeared on forums such as these.
Online magazines just don’t work yet, GAR killed off their own title this summer after failing to get it to work financially.
Was an identity ever established for this Dornier at Breck?
Didn’t the ’87 Biggin formation include Kermit Weeks’ Mosquito? Or are my grey cells getting eroded by age?