dark light

Mike J

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 3,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #885578
    Mike J
    Participant

    The old terminal building at the Musee de l’Air at Le Bourget and the Swiss Transport Museum at Lucerne are two prime examples of where hanging can work well. I quite like the way the USMC Museum at Triangle, Va have done their main atrium, with a number of hanging aircraft, too. http://www.usmcmuseum.com/exhibits_Leatherneck.asp

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #886378
    Mike J
    Participant

    With the F-15 now inside the restoration hangar, I think that all the Duxford-based IWM aircraft (not including those out on loan elsewhere) are now under cover (as long as there’s not a quilt fair or hairdressers’ convention taking place). That would not have been possible withouit hanging some of them.

    Having said that, in order to achieve this statistic they have given away (or sold off for peanuts) quite a number, and chopped some up for scrap.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #886530
    Mike J
    Participant

    I suppose that, they could have swapped their complete Mustang for the one at Cosford

    The Cosford one has vanished into storage.

    in reply to: RAF Museum's 'First World War in the Air' exhibition #886541
    Mike J
    Participant

    Yes, there are sound effects, of the ‘dagga dagga dagga’ kind. 😉

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #887214
    Mike J
    Participant

    I agree – a quite interesting thread degenerating into petty squabbling. Unedifying and unnecessary.

    This does seem to be Chox/WH904’s modus operandi. He has been banned from numerous fora, in the both the aviation and modeling spheres, for just this kind of behavior. He seems to get a kick from spamming boards with numerous, delibrately contrary, posts until the forum admin get fed up and ban him. My researches (Google can be a useful tool) show that this has happened, not just once or twice, but on numerous occasions. He also has a history of popping up using multiple user names, as he has here contrary to section 11 of the Forum Code of Conduct.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #887498
    Mike J
    Participant

    I think people need to understand what the CAA do.

    To be fair Bruce, the comprehension deficit seems only to exist with Mr Chox, or WH904, or whatever identity he is posting under this week, rather than with ‘people’ in general.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #887840
    Mike J
    Participant

    Oh no, the big, bad CAA won’t let us play with our toys, those nasty mean men do it just to spite us.

    .

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #888156
    Mike J
    Participant

    No, we have the fact that they’re totally unsuitable for operation by a civilian operator to ‘blame’ for that, as the smoking hole in South Africa only went on to prove.

    in reply to: Jaguars! #888159
    Mike J
    Participant

    There were a pile in my local Tesco yesterday, and in WH Smiths this morning

    in reply to: Jaguars! #888192
    Mike J
    Participant

    Hopefully one of the four at Cosford will find its way into the RAF Museum collection in due course, but I’m not holding my breath as they seem to be heading down the route of rationalisation of the collection.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #889016
    Mike J
    Participant

    The way the lottery seems to be drying up…

    Another example today of lottery funding ‘drying up’ – £4.7m this time.

    http://www.bristolaero.org/news/2014/11/27/bristol-aerospace-centre-takes-off-with-47-million-heritage-lottery-fund-support

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #889037
    Mike J
    Participant

    The reality is, even though there are probably, what, getting on for 30 of the things flying in the UK now, is that a Spitfire is the thing to get if you want to attract bookings. Everything from a garden fete, through the myriad of Proms concerts, to major international airshows, want to put ‘Spitfire’ near the top of their list of attractions. Nothing, but nothing, else will be guaranteed to put numbers on the gate in the same way, and that goes for this season, next season, and any other season after that.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #889051
    Mike J
    Participant

    No, the answer is ‘yet another Spitfire’!

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #889273
    Mike J
    Participant

    The way the lottery seems to be drying up…

    Seriously? £3.1m for the Lincs Bomber Command Centre. £1.5m for Stow Maries last year. Major funding for the RAF Museum’s new World War One in the Air exhibition and the Dornier 17 recovery. I’d hardly call that ‘drying up’.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 future – what to replace it with? #890076
    Mike J
    Participant

    As far as the return to flight of another type, with enough appeal to the general public to have any real chance of success, the only one that I can see with a real chance would be if a credible Group were to come forward with a sensible plan to operate a Mosquito.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 3,162 total)