dark light

Jō Asakura

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,223 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2293149
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Ka-52 firing cannon @ declined angle:

    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6619/52524511.c/0_96ce2_b2e36030_orig

    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Interesting development. Clearly the Japanese are hoping for a tie-up with the US 6G winning contender, the amendments to their military export legislation facilitate this. Although up until a few years ago I would have doubted the US side committing to a joint venture with anyone, this is more likely now given their current and medium term defence budgetary constraints, I doubt Europe would have the appetite or funds for participation in such a programme.

    Also, depending on how quickly the F-35 problems are resolved, the ultimate financial costs of the F-35 and how this affects procurement- will only serve to aid the likelihood of a jv . So good timing from the Japanese, whilst retaining a fall back option with the indigenous F-3.

    Conformal arrays composed of GaN (and SiGe embedded in the skin) for the “all-around surveillance and jamming system” are likely, not so sure about “reflection suppression” -some form of active cancellation?

    in reply to: F-35 News thread. Part Deux #2296773
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    F-35A first weapons release 16/10/12:

    http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1581247&postcount=1022

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2297063
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Russian’s next-generation bomber takes shape

    There’s an important caveat for the state funding of the PAK-DA, namely the forecast that Russia’s petrodollar surplus is due to vanish due to oil import costs overtaking those for export revenues sometime 2015/16.* This is due to the prodigious rate of consumption of the domestic market.The IMF concurs that the Russian government is expected to run a small budget deficit and negative trade balance in 2016, for the first time since the late 1990s.

    Although Russia’s oil-fuelled surplus accumulated $785bn between 2000 and 2011, the second half of this decade is likely to be a rude awakening for Russian policy makers. Hence, aside for core programmes like PAK-FA, heavy UCAV etc. don’t expect R&D programmes and procurement plans to be awash with cash as is currently being touted in the press.

    Bear in mind the PAK-DA is, much like it’s US counterpart, most likely to be based on an enlarged UCAV with a 2-man cockpit (otherwise why bother)- and is therefore going to be an inherently very expensive programme. I’m not saying there won’t be a PAK-DA, it’s just the timelines are a tad optimistic.

    *the forecasts are based on the assumption of oil being $104 per barrel in 2015.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2010574
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Another section of that composite superstructure:

    http://cs410616.userapi.com/v410616906/35d8/fajfI9qvr5w.jpg

    A busy Severnaya Verf:

    http://cs410616.userapi.com/v410616906/35d0/cDferg1tJq0.jpg

    in reply to: Il-476 vs An-70 (and others) #2298524
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Oh, I see!! Apologies! :o……but sheesh, didn’t think it was possible to feel so passionately about a transporter (as you can tell I’m not so clued up on ’em).

    Does it remind you of a long lost voluptuous Ukrainian sweetheart, Trident sweety?….in that case I understand. 😉

    in reply to: Il-476 vs An-70 (and others) #2298538
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Pic of cargo hold, enough space for ‘double decker’:

    http://business-gazeta.ru/images/article/15784.jpg

    In 2009 this official Antonov advertising board gave the An-70 a price tag of $60m, the same as an Il-76MD!
    If the data is accurate it outperforms all its contemporaries (including A400M) and loses only, though quite badly, in fuel efficiency (maybe the modifications to the prop spacing were an effort to address this issue?):

    http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2500/495943995an70comparison.jpg

    Construction materials, blue is carbon fibre and yellow is fibre glass:

    http://s017.radikal.ru/i433/1210/b1/5bb1535822a8.jpg

    in reply to: General UCAV/UAV discussion – A New Hope #2298585
    Jō Asakura
    Participant


    http://imglink.ru/pictures/12-10-12/6e7ce9cb9168eb9f264e94d165233368.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2298953
    Jō Asakura
    Participant


    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/1/7/5/2170571.jpg

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2298972
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    May the umm…roomiest and more economic bus win! :p

    Wouldn’t that be the J-20? :confused:

    Take that FLANKER counterfeits!!

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8195/8079108427_046ea2d57b_b.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2299212
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Here is a feature on the Mi-17 V5 of the IAF, are those conformal fuel tanks @ 00:15s?

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=19686

    I agree they’re being very coy on the ‘Super 30’ details, let me add to the excitement & expectations by quoting a man in the know “it will be a serious undertaking, a deep modernisation”.*

    I wouldn’t read too much into the 144 figure for the FGFA. ‘India Strategic’ reported that the Typhoon was a certainty for MMRCA selection, a month prior to Rafale’s victory. Post Putin visit things should be a lot clearer on several programmes, particularly those he is travelling to Delhi to personally oversee and his delegation consisting of those who’s concerns are involved (i.e. Sukhoi, Irkut etc.).

    *M.A. Pogosyan.

    in reply to: Possible BAE/EADS merger #2299410
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    In some ways you could argue a repeat of the Airbus stake debacle has been avoided as BAE investors would not countenance a de facto buy out at such a low point in the firms fortunes. From Enders point of view, this was probably the right time @ the right price to facilitate his vision of a balanced civil-military portfolio by 2020. Surprisingly, it was the Germans who ultimately killed the deal, Merkel faces elections next year and Berlin is averse to EADS’ shift in focus to arms exports.
    Also the Germans feared EADS’ plants in Bavaria would close and (particularly defence) production would be centred in France and the UK.

    The French always dragged their feet on a significant national stake holding (provoking German calls for parity with France) and this would never be acceptable to the UK (and the US). I bet Dassault, Thales et al. breathed a huge sigh of relief! It will probably be years before a similar ‘merger’ is proposed again, and by that time the continental European defence firms will already have a nice slice of any future defence programmes. EADS shares rebounded strongly, whilst BAE’s continued their two-week slide.

    Investors notwithstanding, very bad for BAE though. To have lost out on major aerospace projects and find itself relegated to component supplier and bit-player in the ever decreasing US defence market, maybe a US merger is now on the cards?

    Both Ian King and Dick Olver should heed the Sanskrit saying “Blessed is the man who has vision”.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2299945
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Addendum to the An-70 discussion: is it just me or have they increased separation between the front and rear props with these new spinners?!

    Yeah, they have, compare:

    http://www.salut.ru/rus/section_4/chapter_26/topic_280/d27.jpg

    …with:

    http://spotters.net.ua/file/?id=69934&size=large

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2300702
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    The plane definitely has a lot of power!

    Yeah it does. In this video you can see the Su-35’s relatively effortless take-off @ 2:12, even compared to the T-50, on mil./dry power, and the rather laboured effort of the Su-34 (their formation flypast is always a pleasure to watch :cool:):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC0jIDVedYs&feature=related

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2301001
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    It tends to confirm my hypothesis that those complex intakes are also part of the LO features of the aircraft…

    Therefore I think that Jö Asakura is right in saying Sukhoï won’t need to add a blocker or any other device, the complexity of the intakes and their lips being sufficient to keep radar signature low enough (sorry for the “no s-duct, no stealth” chorus).

    …the real ace up their sleeves being the very material that the compressor face is made of (what was it, a boron-magnesium-polycrystalline carbon nanofiber matrix composite?).

    I wouldn’t rule out the use of a blocker, but my reasoning is this: if they have the capability to ‘stealthify’ the structure of the metal matrix composite structure with CNTs (I believe they’ve had the technical ability for at least 2 years), then why wouldn’t they?

    In early 2008, at the Tambov State Technical University (Тамбовского государственного технического университета), a research team undertook radar absorption tests on UNM ‘Tainut’ (УНМ “Таунит”) in the frequency range of 8.5 to 12 GHz. ‘Tainut’ has a MWNT structure with tube diameter of 60nm and length of 10 micrometres.

    A monolithic polymer composite plate was prepared with an 11.2% constituent (by weight) of UNM ‘Tainut’ with surface treatments’ thickness of 0.3mm and 0.17mm.

    Direct experimental comparisons were made with 2 RAMs used to line the walls, floor & ceiling of anechoic chambers, namely: ‘Don’ (РПП “Дон”) , a structure made of a steel plate thickness of 3 mm, which was glued closely with another ferrite plate of thickness 8 mm. On top of which was the closely pasted ferrite structure consisting of nine (3 by 3) hollow tetrahedral pyramids with base 35mm by 35 mm and a height of 35 mm.

    Also, the RAM ‘Beam’ (РПП”Луч”). This material is a mechanical mixture of organic fibres with amorphous graphite (soot), soaked in an organic binder. The electrical resistivity of the material, “Ray” is greater than 200Mw × m. Elements of this coating are made in the form of plates with thickness of about 50mm and dimensions of approximately 500mm by 1000 mm. With outer (adjacent to the walls of premises) by these plates covered with aluminium foil with a thickness of 0.1-0.2 mm.

    The results were as follows: the ‘Tainut’ polymer composite of thickness 0.3mm and 0.17mm exhibited absorption of -5.2dB &-3.3dB respectively (and outperformed ‘Don’). The RAM ‘Beam’ attained an absorption of -5.8dB, that’s a difference of 0.6dB but the latter is 49.83mm thicker!!

    Remember, ‘Tainut’ is now commercially available, so the CNTs infused in the modification of the CFRP in the metal matrix composite fan blade will be tailor made.

    They’ll probably be happy with a -10dB absorption for a 1mm layer of CNT for the compressor fan blades. As the T-50’2 inlet/engine duct is also made of CFRP it is likely to employ CNT layers of whatever thickness & composition that is required (probably several millimetres), since inlet cavities are large radar reflectors. As the layers would be an integral part of the structure and not a post manufacture treatment, this would solve the RAM adhesion problems encountered on the F-22 ducts, and would probably be relatively maintenance free. The canted engines would mean any incident wave returns would be reflected into the CNT modified ducts.

    In May 2009 the Tambov University scientists received a special award:

    Представленные на конкурсе разработки вызвали интерес заместителя Председателя Правительства РФ, Председателя ВПК при Правительстве РФ С.Б. Иванова…

    [Tainut’s] submission for the design competition elicited the interest of Deputy Chairman of the RF Government, the Chairman of the MIC under the Government of the Russian Federation Sergei Ivanov…

    http://xn--80aa7afbgahku.xn--p1ai/nns/20158/news/?page=27288

    I bet it did. The T-50 is very dear to Sergei Ivanov’s heart. 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 661 through 675 (of 1,223 total)