dark light

Jō Asakura

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,223 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796086
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    My mistake it was Ka-band (millimetre).

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2031631
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Nice pic, why do they keep PSing the bow?

    It can’t be down to the torpedo tubes as this pic is already in the public domain, it must be something to do with the sonar (under the shroud).

    http://www.paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?id=13551

    They’re coy about the propeller too, but that’s an anti-sonar/signature measure.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796094
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Almaz-Antey 2010 Annual Report

    Ashurbeili also revealed information about the future successor of the S-500: “The next air defense weapons that will replace the S-500 will be airborne rather than ground-based. They are already being developed and tested… It will be an aircraft that will monitor the airspace and not only track targets, but actually disable them.”

    …As part of international cooperation programs GSKB has been negotiating possible contracts for the S-400 SAM system with Saudi Arabia and conducted technical consultations regarding the S-400 with China
    (http://mdb.cast.ru )
    Said Aminov, editor-in-chief of the Vestnik PVO (http://www.pvo.su) website

    Interesting! Son of ‘Foxhound‘, did you know the Russkies are developing a podded Ku-band AESA slated for the T-50?

    I would highly doubt China would be offered Russian standard S-400 complex. More likely a system similar to KM-SAM.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2380540
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    I’m not an expert on the Jag, but ‘Darin II’ (?):

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/10310-3/JT066.jpg

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2381359
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Again, my beef is simply that these missiles are consuming resources for only a modest increase in performance which could be spent on accelerating the next generation instead.

    I think the incremental increase in performance of the RVV-MD/SD/BD series is aimed merely at replenishing inventory stocks of R-73/27/33 whose shelf-life has expired or is near to expiry. Aside from AGAT seekers (in some cases acting as Chinese sub-contractors), very little has emerged in the Russian A2A domain over the last decade.

    I would, however, expect the next gen.(slated to commence testing in 2014/15) to be well funded and on a performance par with their Western ‘analogues’, especially given the sensor suite slated for the PAK-FA.

    Having said that, seeing the IAF’s ‘Super 30s’ totting 8 or more Meteors would be an awesome sight!

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2382291
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Me thinks monolithic/single-crystal turbine blades for the compressor and ceramic matrix composite for the stator blades.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2382373
    Jō Asakura
    Participant
    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2382562
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    only two per bay!! i was expecting al least 3. thanks paraley 🙂

    It may yet be three. P. Butowskii’s report in this month’s AI claims none of the current missiles (RVV-MD, SD, BD), are intended for PAK-FA’s internal bays. Those that are, are in the early stages of development and are expected to enter flight tests 2014/15.

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to57000/056521.jpg

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2382617
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Ya see TooCool_12f, in the late 1990s there was this place called ‘Fairyland’ where some defence giants lobbied their govt. into believing that stealth technology was reaching an apogee of development and, given certain procurement levels, economies of scale would facilitate unit , life-cycle & operating costs being cheaper than your average 4G fighters. A decade went by and after much finger-tapping, (delayed) empty promises and the ritual of throwing large sums of money into a black hole-‘Fairyland’ endured a perfect storm where investment bankers ran the economy into the ground (ironically, also after making similar false promises and grandiose forecasts as their defence sector counterparts).

    Suddenly, there came a realisation that the 5G fighters were prohibitively expensive and could only be procured in such numbers which would have to operate in conjunction with 4G fighters (where new incarnations of these fighters appeared and priced themselves back into the market, becoming technically viable well into the 2030s).

    The IAF is lucky in many respects as it will get the latest iterations of the Eurocanards, as necessary replacements of those aircraft approaching the end of their service/airframe lives and the urgent need to sustain squadron levels.
    Deep ToT for the Eurocanard and co-operation on the PAK-FA will be a steep and invaluable learning curve for the Indian aerospace industry. The MMRCA winner will remain viable platforms for many decades to come, especially when operating in conjunction with their own versions of this beauty a decade from now:

    http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7219/ucasgearup2.jpg

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2383538
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    only a few hundred more and he’ll take your spot 😉

    …maybe he’s going for the ‘Know-Nothing Google Clown‘ award, which entitles you to put your name to multiple threads you know nothing about?

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2384648
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Mikoyan1991, you’ve made some 48 posts and nearly all of your ‘statements’ have been effectively (and politely) refuted, contradicted and/or totally dismantled.

    Surely such a feat deserves a special award?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2384689
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Strategic benefit represents “hard to get technology”…
    Similarly if a vendor offers GaN AESA T/R module technology, when India is yet to field a GaAs bases active array for fighters, the ToT will attain a strategic value.

    I’d say the term ‘strategic’ is more wide-reaching than military tech and encompasses the general economic sphere. EF will win (imho) because the consortium will offer the broadest offsets in conjunction with lower life-cycle costs (as evidenced by the M2K upgrade costs), irrespective of ‘fly away cost’.

    However, the Indian govt. will be keen to foster closer economic ties with the EU powerhouse that is Germany, and the Germans will be keen to reciprocate given the EU’s current economic and financial woes. Remember, there is a dearth of German industrial, hi-tech capital goods both civilian, dual use & military the Indians would love to get to grips with. Therein lies your ‘strategic-economic partnership’, clearly where the EU (principally Germany) is preferred over the US.

    GaN is ‘plug n play’ and isn’t really a mysterious ‘black art’ like, say, 5G fighter engines (which the Russians will provide significant know-how anyways).

    I think it’s really a no-brainer.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2303072
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Else we could just buy F-35s like everyone else.;)

    I’m sure committing anything up to $35bn for the PAK-FA/FGFA project in the long term, the IAF will get the 2nd stage engine or a very close derivative, either way it will be a successor to the 117/AL-41F1 in the 17+T class.

    Given a non-captive, open market anyone opting for the F-35 over this beauty needs their head examining…

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/8/8/7/1992788.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2303662
    Jō Asakura
    Participant

    Back to topic are there any news wrt a potential purchase of MiG-35s by the RuAF? My last known information was that the RuAF has expressed its interest in the purchase of possibly 48 MiG-35 post 2013.

    That depends on whether the purchase falls within the remit of the approved defence budget allocation thru 2020. I don’t think it does.

    Interestingly, this article claims Salyut is in negotiations to supply AL-31FM2 for the Su-34.

    http://www.ainonline.com/?q=aviation-news/ain-defense-perspective/2011-10-03/big-new-chinese-order-russian-fighter-engines

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2032372
    Jō Asakura
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,223 total)