dark light

Cees Broere

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Canopy Rails for Static #1182075
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Hi Robert,

    Fantastic piece of work, any more pics?
    What are your plans, a fuselage section or a whole airframe.
    Display at home or intended for a museum?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Albemarle, another extinct beast #1182879
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    It least it was used operationally and some were given to Russia on lend-lease basis. But the airframe was part wooden I think. Alan H weren’t you at the Cumbria site at one point looking for leftover bits?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Halifax HR727 MH-V #1183331
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Hi Don,

    I think there’s a pic of HR727 in the book by Victor Bingham “Halifax, second to none”
    Also the trials are mentioned .
    Hope this helps

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: New P-51B flies in the US #1183814
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Who cares, what a beauty. Well done team

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Lancaster KB999 #1184503
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Or go for the arctic York instead.;)

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1184506
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    IIRC the RAFM didn’t want to look the museum like a scrapyard with the Halifax, Hurricane and Gladiator wreckage already on show. It would however be a sensible thing to do to display the tailsection of LK488 (in whatever condition, as is or restored) to at least have some representation of the imporant Stirling. If National Lottery funds could be found then at least a full scale mock up can be made, the technology is available. There was talk about a project other than the Stirling Project to build a GRP Stirling about a decade ago but apparently that came to nought. The time is now to do something about the lack of a Stirling. Some years ago the RAF Sub Aquateam did work on a Stirling wreck in a lake but gave up as there were some missing crewmembers (the more reason to recover the wreck to find them) although the wreck was in many pieces and the polluted lakebed didn’t help things too. The longer we wait the more deterioration will take place on any possible usable wrecks. If a large scale project could be started perhaps it would be possible to gather the Dutch and French main fuselage sections for reference to re-engineer the drawings etc.
    Think about what a magnificent sight it will be to see a full size Stirling regardless of it’s construction on display somewhere.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Excellent RCAF video #1185421
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Wans’t he also going to produce a video.DVD on the restoration of NA337?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1185435
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    A similar outcome can be achieved for the Stirling, using the RAF Museum parts as a source of extenal dimensions, without dismantling them, or consuming them, or even incorporating them in the finished outcome, where original, re-usable, and available parts exist, they could be incorporated into the FSM, and the rest of the aircraft scaled up from general layout drawings, and photos etc, not unlike the full scale model of the Arrow built in Canada.

    Ok then, what’s the use of storing these parts indefinately without doing anything to preserve or restore them. In the past the RAFM has disposed of imporants parts or even scrapped them. In other cases they have supplied a complete Hampden nose section to Canada which they could have used it at this moment for their Hampden project. Similar to the many Wellington parts in the UK. There are possibilities to reconstruct an airframe but there isn’t enough cooperation between various parties to do so (whatever the reason). It would be a good thing if a certain organisation in the UK for instance (BAPC?) would issue guidelines to enable a missing type to be recreatedd in whatever form as long as it is to enable the public to see what it looked like in the flesh. YAM did it and created a Halifax (yes, it’s one whatever you say, it has more Halifax related sections than mock ups and even that can be put right if the possibility would present itself).
    Apart from the Stirling Project, nobody is ever willing to undertake such a project. With talking a project doesn’t start, it needs blood sweat tears and a lot of money! This is a very interesting topic but a very frustrating one as well.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187175
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    At Vraux there is a large section of fuselage as well as in Holland at Deelen there is a fuselage section too but the floor has been cut off unfortunately (don’t know about the one at Vraux, but would suspect that it has been butchered as well). Who knows what’s still out there. I was told by divers that about fifteen years ago they found an almost complete wing with Hercules engine still attachted iin the IJsselmeer (the “famous” Venhuizen SOE supply Stirling) which they recovered using airbags and sold to a scrapdealer. I wasn’t amused when I heard that.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187357
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=76078&highlight=Stirling

    See this thread for the pics of LK488 bits in storage.

    Amazing what’s still left (and would make a good start wink wink )

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1187534
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    IMHO the best option would be to investigate the Egyptian site where Sitrlings were buldozed into the ground after the war (see other threads). There were several airframes and if anything is still left these section would at least yield enough material to reverse engineer missing components. In any other case an underwater site (mentioned in this thread already) would be the only other option. If the Russian Stirling still existed it would have been offererd to the west many years ago, but you never know. To build a Stirling in the same fashion as YAM’s Halifax or the Canadian Halifax restoration will take a massive effort in several countries I think.
    Something needs to be done (other than the Stirling Project) on a big scale (read: money) and who will be the designated party. Seing that the Vulcan To The Sky has managed to gather sufficient funds to enable the Vulcan to fly again shows that it can be done. This is of course totally different as they started out with a complete airframe but the idea is the same.
    Any comments?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1189246
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Hi John,

    I know, it’s the same story all over again. You and your volunteers have already spent decades on gathering all sorts of material that could have been lost because nobody cared at the time (but that too is understandable with hindsight). At least the Stirling Project is doing something about recreating an impressive section of the unsong Stirling. Perhaps the RAFM give in this time and have the tail restored. Even when a substantial wreck is found in fresh water or the wrecks in Egypt, the work is still massive but important.
    The Stirling was an important type and needs to be represented in any form in the UK (same as the Whitley).
    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1189260
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    It’s a shame that such a site will not be the focal point of attention for a major recovery project. This month a survey vessel is looking for the exact location of Halifax LW170 which should be at a depth of 1.000 metres in the Irish Sea.

    Determination and money is all that it takes, and that’s where the problem lies (more in the money side of things). The tailsection of LK488 is relatively complete and can easily be restored for display. A oomplete tailsection already gives a good view about the bulk of the Stirling before the Stirling Project have reached their goal. Can the National Lottery be of help here as well as they did with the Vulcan?

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: "Wot Plane" quiz. #1191271
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    If is the same airframe, it’s certainly sprouted different engines!

    It did having being built with Merlin engines originally but was used as a test airframe, the fins are also different compared to the standard triangular fins.
    The success of the Hercules engine installation gave the Halifax the much needed power and gave it a great performance boost.

    Cheers

    Cees

    in reply to: "Wot Plane" quiz. #1191477
    Cees Broere
    Participant

    Hi Steve,

    Yes, correct. One of the various Halifax development protypes (look at the camouflage with yellow undersides). Don’t remember the serial from memory but could be the one that also tested the Hercules installation and various fin
    shapes (R-something).

    Cheers

    Cees

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,395 total)