An Adour is good enough for something the size of Taranis or the Neuron demonstrator, but wouldn’t provide enough power for a larger UAV. Also, it’s rather an old design.
The scaled-up Neuron is supposed to be powered by a non-afterburning M88. I’ve not seen anything official about the planned powerplant for Son of Taranis, but an EJ200 or M88 sans reheat would probably give about the right power. Maybe RR & Snecma can work something out between them.
Interesting ideas. Political gains aside, is there anything (esp. technical) RR or Snecma could learn from each other? Mass manufacturing process for Snecma maybe, since RR is a much bigger manufacturer? I don’t see any aera where Snecma could outshine RR, to be honest. (But I’m no specialist.)
See this Ares post, 4th paragraph.
A Rafale trying to play a Warthog’s role might be quite funny to watch…
For me “Omnirole” is just like “5th Gen”: a meaningless marketing term (truism?) indeed.
Qatar Targets 2012 Fighter Decision
The service is evaluating a broad spectrum of aircraft, including the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and F-15, Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale, says Al-Khayarin. Saab officials note they also have entered the competition.
Who has been censored?
Today, “C dans l’air” (France 5 channel) dealt with the topic in a 1-hour debate with military experts (incl. former French Army general Henri Bentégeat).
Recorded broadcast (streaming) for those who understand French: http://www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/index-fr.php?page=resume&id_rubrique=1569
For those who can’t keep up, there’s still a good archive video of the Jaguar M (around 8:30). 😉
A few analyses from the French media:
Jean Guisnel for Le Point (centre-right) : COOPERATION – Paris and London organize their defense
Jean-Dominique Merchet for Marianne (centre-left) : Between Paris and London, the new entente cordiale sounded the death knell for European defense
Isabelle Lasserre for Le Figaro (right-wing) : Joint Anglo-French nuclear trials in new defense agreement – Paris and London sealed their entente cordiale
I’m not qualified to tell what you should write or not in this thread, but I don’t think those who want to discuss about “UK/France military cooperation” would mind if you developed your topic on either the Viper or Rafale thread (where I’m sure you’ll find enough Viper/JSF/Rafale/whatever fanboys to spend hours chitchatting about this).
From now I’ll try to keep my natural trolling tendencies away from here. (Announcement: I sell my French keyboard. Just dropped once.)
If a F-35 and a Rafale crashed today, and the Chinese government only could reach 1 crash site in time, which crash site would they choose?
It’s rather obvious that they’d choose the Rafale: no choice.
Repeat after me: F-35 has PASSIVE STEALTH.
I’m very surprised that the U.S. hasn’t made a fuss about compromising secrets on the F-35C. In the past the French haven’t been exactly trustworthy concerning stealth. I’m not worried the French will attack us. I’m worried they will steal F-35 tech and build there own. Now how to you protect the tech if the aircraft is on a French ship?
I guess you kept in mind the well-known rumour that there is a hidden hangar on the CdG where foreign aircraft are disassembled, reverse engineered and reassembled while their pilots are enjoying a dinner with their French “allies”, eating foie gras, sipping red wine and watching female pole dancers. Am I right?
This helped me understand why the Rafale looks like a patchwork of different bits barely matching together: ’cause the parts come from older alien jets!
“Oh look! Zey have deezined an aircraft wiz matte black paint. It looks meen, let’s doo ze same! Just like when wee stole the delta-canard configurayshun from zem!”
——————–
On a less trolling note, regarding the title of the thread: we already cooperate, and I didn’t hear anyone complaining. So tightening the bonds seems feasible.
I like how the so-called rear visibility depends on the position of the camera in the cockpit and the focal length of the lens mounted on it.
Brazil FX2 – Gripen NG cockpit proposed by Aeroeletrônica:
The HUD seems smaller than the real one. Bad CGI or should I have my eyes checked?
How reliable is Times Now when it comes to defence topics? It seems strange that political factors helped the 2 (hypothetical) finalists: is the IAF really qualified for such issues?
By watching the video it seems that the F-18 could re-enter the game if an uncertainty about the engines is dispelled by Boeing/GE.
“Gentlemen, your target for tonight is feeding the trolls. Whizz-kids and armchair specialists are predicted to be numerous and persistent on the run-in and over the target, and bull**** is expected to be dense throughout the mission. Synchronize watches and good luck.”
© Bill “Cracking” S. (freely adapted by myself)