dark light

von_herrs

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chilean F-16 C Block 50+ "Peace Pumas" #2614165
    von_herrs
    Participant

    Having 10-20 Falcons in reality is not much better than having 10-20 Mirage 2000s or Gripens, because the capabilities of the aircraft is eroded already by not-very-sharp maintanance and training. And plus, it would be impossible to create tactics and combat strategies with only 10 specimens, thus failing to bring out the best in the aircraft. If I was in charge of the air force, i would much rather have gotten 18-30 Gripens without the overly-expensive and unnessecery electronics. It would not be so hard on spares and ground crew. I personally find this decision rather disturbing, becuase this is a sign of South America’s mover away from rationalisation to machoistic warlordly mis-judgements, Africa-style. Also, it would be rather obvious that Chile doesn’t need those kind of planes anyways. Argentina? No chance of armed conflict. Bolivia? Peru? Probably would stay on the ground. Peru’s Mig-29s are already non-functional, and Bolivia? Surely nothing more advanced then what Chile currently has.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2614178
    von_herrs
    Participant

    What? The Saudis have Eagles? It really is becoming more and more to me a childish competition of “Who’s pocket is deeper, Arabs or Israelis?”

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2614179
    von_herrs
    Participant

    actually its J-7E, which has F-16 level manoeuverability with its new cranked wings with leading edges and more powerful engines, so the photo gotta be fake cuz there is no need for J-10 (remember the cost) in the August 1st Team.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2614732
    von_herrs
    Participant

    The thing that makes me shake my head is that those deep-poketed Middle East sheikhs buy their weapons without any sort of much-needed examination of their actual needs. What do you need the Rafale or the Typhoon for? Fighting the Americans? even the Israelis only have the F-16 and F-15, and the truth is, it’s much better to have double the amount of Mirages or Falcons or even Gripens (say 120) than 60 Rafales or Typhoons when fighting the Israelis. However, the most-needed component is decent air force discipline, organisation, and training.

    I initially thought that with their money, they would advance a little bit from the warlords on the Dark Continent.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2614841
    von_herrs
    Participant

    in fact, i would probably compare it to Su-27, which sadly offers little value for the money, even with all the stuff bout its capabilities.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2614844
    von_herrs
    Participant

    The only thing i have to say about the Eurofighter: the epitome example of the forces of combined bureaucrats of Germany, and others. The design is a nightmare to build from the start. Ventral air intakes for a 12ton plane? Even F-16 wasnt that easy to build.

    in reply to: Chilean F-16 C Block 50+ "Peace Pumas" #2614848
    von_herrs
    Participant

    personally, i find Gripen, or even the Mirage 2000 a much better choice for Chile, if they need those kinda stuff in there anyways.

    in reply to: Singapore say No to Eurofighter!!! #2614960
    von_herrs
    Participant

    probably more likely rafale

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2615983
    von_herrs
    Participant

    hey, do anyone have reliable stats and specs for K-8, cuz on the net its all over the place.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force to purchase 300 Yak-130 trainers #2618417
    von_herrs
    Participant

    Problem: the main customers of for Soviet Bloc: e.g. African countries, SE Asian countries, basically 3-world countries, would no way buy the Yak-130. THey would go for something much simpler and much more reflective to their needs, e.g. Hawk or MB-339. Basically, only richer countries would buy supersonic trainers, while rich countries dunt go for russian products. they go for american and euro goodies. so basically, the export potential is very slim.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2618851
    von_herrs
    Participant

    well the point is, sure there is no way we could beat off the US, but we’re gonna give them a bloddy knuckle so they could think twice before attacking

    in reply to: PAF news and speculation #2619396
    von_herrs
    Participant

    The thing is tho, i dunt feel like its time yet to judge the jf-17. hell, the first plane wasnt even handed over yet. we have to wait 2-3 yrs at least for the exports to pick up.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2621903
    von_herrs
    Participant

    i would discount the 16 m length. i firmly believe J-10 is a 10-ton figher, just like Rafale and F-16 blk 50/60, so as such, it would prove impossible to have such a large dimension, because then the manoeuverability would be strained. i am more looking at a little bit over 15 m. And quite frankly, i am disgusted about “My plane is bigger than yours.” a)Weight does not really count considering J-10’s possible roles, and b)Cost-effectiveness is the key, not he individual performandce.

    in reply to: Giving small nosed aircraft BVR capabilitie. #2625121
    von_herrs
    Participant

    take a look on sinodefence for J-7G. its the best MiG-21 variant out there.

    in reply to: EMBRAER Getting Big Orders for Smaller Jets #756260
    von_herrs
    Participant

    problem is, 190 is probably gonna get screwed by Bombardier C-110 and C-130 that was just approved by its board.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 37 total)