dark light

WACHENR0DER

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 460 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Has Rafale become an abyss for billions? #2692250
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    unfortunately I feel that the market for both the Rafale and Typhoon will be quite limited.. unless lots of delays, dramatic cost rises, etc happen with the JSF. Furthermore its hard for Dassault to compete with it’s own Mirage 2k being one of the Rafales adversaries marketing wise.. while the Gripen seems to appeal more to those outside of Europe.. while the Russians and Chinese offer their wares for much cheaper unit prices.. I think Singapore may be the last “battle spot” for the Rafale.

    in reply to: Su-30MKM #2695682
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by GDL
    Harry, I don’t think this has anything to do with Denel aviation. Avitronics is 51% South African owned (Grintek) and 49% Swedish owned (SAAB). They specialise in electronic warfare systems.

    Do they supply anything to the Gripen by anychance?

    in reply to: Su-30MKM #2695741
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    I’m guessing as far as cockpit goes..it’ll end up looking similar to the MKI with the same 7 French MFDs but using an French HUD instead yes?

    in reply to: Hindustan HF-73 … a LCA predecessor ?? #2695743
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    I think the fueselage looks exactly like a Tornado ADV, just w/o swign wings and has two tails..

    http://www.greendevils.pl/militaria/sailor_lot/tornado2/linef3.jpg

    in reply to: Single Engine v. Two Engines #2695929
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by Vympel
    All hail the mighty B-52, eh Arthur? 🙂

    It’s Tomb, not Toon.

    was that a western name they made up for him because neither Tomb or Toon is Vietnamese.. perhaps it’s some mispronunciation of Tuan ..the closest Vietnamese name to Toon I can think of.

    btw, great debate here.. well minus the insults that is.

    in reply to: Irkut (IAPO or Sukhoi to others) buys Yakovlev #2696737
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    pretty much so, since it ate pretty much the dominant part of the company.. however I can expect to see Sukhoi (or at least IAPO) promoting Yak-130s with its Su-30MKI’s and etc.

    in reply to: Single Engine v. Two Engines #2696792
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by GarryB
    This makes sense but is not totally true. The Mig-29 could have been a single engine aircraft… with a single AL-31, or even a single engine from the Mig-31.

    The Hornet could have been a single engine aircraft, in fact considering the Hornet and Falcon/Eagle High low mix and the respective Soviet Fulcrum Flanker high low mix you’d think a large twin with two whopper engines and a smaller lighter fighter with a single whopper seem to suggest a pattern.

    A lot of people here have suggested that single engine aircraft would be cheaper and simpler, but is anyone really suggesting a single engine aircraft in the F-22 category?

    An NK-321 would make it powerful enough… Imagine a Tu-160 as a strategic bomber, Tu-22M3 as the tactical deep strike bomber, and a single engined fighter in the F-22 class all using 4, 2 and 1 engine respectively.
    Considering the cost of all the other expensive bits on the F-22 however I think the extra cost of a second engine makes sense.

    Garry, my memory is a bit foggy but wasn’t a variant of the NK-321 proposed for one of the Yakovlev fighter projects and there were some serious issues was a result?

    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Great pics, I would love to see that emergency compartment the Mi-28 is supposed to have, somewhere in the rear

    in reply to: Indonesia: 8 more Flankers #2696901
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by aditya
    These flankers were born in which factory? both single and double seaters?

    at KnAAPO, Komsomolsk in Khabarovsk Krai (in the far east) I do believe. Don’t know for the single seater

    in reply to: FX-BR cancellation rumors #2696945
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    I always thought it’d wind down to the Su-35 and the Mirage 2000. But you are definitely right, two such different aircraft that would require different doctrines..

    but I suppose since they got those leased Kfirs, they can afford to wait a little longer.

    in reply to: create an airforce scenario #3 #2696957
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
    helicopters will be more important here..
    Mi-24 is a must with night time abilities..however light ulitility transports is important too..and Russia doesn’t have too many of that..

    Don’t look just at Mil..

    if I was to build their airforce..it’d be similar..but i’d look to Kamov, they have several light multirole helicopters.. Kazan too!

    Instead of the the Sokol you’re using, I’ll use the Ka-226 series and variants, very useful little things. The back part can be detached too

    http://www.aeronautics.ru/img001/ka22601.jpg
    http://aviashow.avia.ru/images/ka-226_1.jpg
    and for something a little bigger,

    http://arms.host.sk/helicopters/ka32.jpg
    Kamov states it can be used as armed troop carrier as well.. but I may just prefer the Mi-24 since there’s much more upgrade options available for it

    As for the rest of the procurement.. I think the following (forgot whom it was from) make allies from far away and watch out for neighbors could be applied.. Russia no longer borders Kyrgyzstan..and despite some bad history here and there..they’re better off as strategic partners since they have the same interest.. however I still would prefer the M2K-5 as the main air defence fighter (two or three squadrons of it).. it’s performance in Kagril is just simply too similar to the operations Kyrgyzstan might face since the Pamirs where those militants hide out can be comparable to Kagril.

    the SU-25SK is a good choice.. the extra goodies on the other Frogfoot such as maritime missle capability and Kopyo radar system isn’t really needed.. these can be more focused on supporting border troops..

    apart from this, I would invest heavily in artillery, such as the 2S19.. I think Kyrgyzstan has alot of T-72s they can use for the chasis.

    in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696959
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    i was searching for some new pics of the Ching Kuo and stumbled upon this

    😎

    http://www.wasurena.sakura.ne.jp/~kato/graphic/aircraft/chingkuo.jpg

    I found it rather amusing, but a pretty nice drawing.

    in reply to: create an airforce scenario #2 #2697069
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by Bonemachine
    I would like to make this case a little more difficult and maybe more interesting.

    Although I like the idea of a hi/lo mix of Typhoon/gripen but would not a newly proclaimed independent sakhalin need this capability a lot sooner? They could probably not afford to wait for years for these exelent ac to come they need them yesterday!! I dont think Russia would wait untill the brand new high tech AF was ready before they started to turn up the heath.

    In addittion would europe support a breakaway republic from Russia? That has long been a nightmare for western european politicians that Russia should become even more fragmented. Would they dare supporting shuch a move?

    What kind of a fill-in would be possible that could be delivered at once and be combat ready in the shortest possible timeframe? In this way used ac of russian nationality could be a solution since the members of the new “sakhalin AF” shold have some experience of it, but what to get and how to get them?

    I dont need comments on my political part, but if you need an airforce today what would you do?

    The unfortunate thing is Sakhalin has almost no combat aircraft stationed there.. so any attempts to nationalize Rusian aircraft will mostly be some amphibians and helicopters.. Russia removed their MiG-31s, etc a while ago. Also an independant Sakhalin probably also has to protect the Kuril Island chain, which is under it’s jurisdiction. But i suppose in a conflict, protecting hte larger 600 mile island is much more important than protecting a bunch of disputed islands that are barely inhabited

    in reply to: Anyone have a picture of the F-2 cockpit? #2697306
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    Originally posted by MarocMirage
    So what can a F-2 do that a modern F-16 can’t? Why build the expensive F-2 when you can get a modern F-16 for a reasonable price?

    Apart from being able to carry 4 AShM’s.. I don’t know :confused:
    lots of stories I heard over the project.. originally the Japanese intended to use their own design, which looked something similar to the J-10 with two tails (check earlier threads for pic). But US pressure made them choose a design based on the F-16..well that’s one version of the story.

    in reply to: Anyone have a picture of the F-2 cockpit? #2697309
    WACHENR0DER
    Participant

    great pics hyperwarp! i was surprised you had so many F-2 cockpits 😎

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 460 total)