Interesting , more details on the earlier pact
India, Germany Sign MoU on Defense Tech Transfer
India, Germany Ink Pact for Hi-Tech Defence Tech Transfer
(Source: DDI Indian government news; issued Sept. 7, 2006)
Paving the way for bilateral strategic and security cooperation, India and Germany have signed their first-ever defence pact encompassing joint training, technology transfers and co-production of hi-tech military hardware.
The Indo-German Defence Cooperation agreement, which would likely to help New Delhi to broadbase its military equipment suppliers to make arms purchases more competitive, has been signed on Wednesday night in Berlin by Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee and his German Counterpart Franz Josef Jung.
Though both the leaders refused to elaborate what areas of defence the agreement was aimed at, Jung said it would mostly cover exchange of cooperation in the field of Navy and in electronic and sureviellance systems, in which Germany recently had made big breakthroughs.
Talking to the reporter after signing the pact, Mukherjee said the agreement, which comes into force immediately, provides for setting up of a high defence committee that would work out the areas of cooperation between the two countries.
The two countries agreed to institute a strategic dialogue at the level of the Indian Defence Secretary and German Secretary of State and form sub committees focusing on strategic defence cooperation, technical cooperation and military-to-military cooperation.
Prior to the signing of the agreement, Mukherjee held almost a marathon 80-minute one-to-one meeting with Jung during which, sources said, fast unfolding events in Lebanon, situation in south Asia as well as developing an exchange of information on global terrorism came up.
Under the agreement, top level defence officials from the two countries would meet once a year alternatively in Germany and India.
It also envisages the setting up of a bilateral strategic defence cooperation group headed by the joint secretary in the ministry of defence in India and deputy chief of staff, politico-military affairs, German federal Ministry of defence.
The subjects covered by the group would include security and defence policy, diasater relief and other mutually agreed areas.
Another bilateral group would deal with defence technology cooperation and defence business cooperation and would be headed by joint secretary in the acquisition wing of the defence ministry and an armament director on the German side.
The agreement also provides for enhancing exchange of armed forces personnel in each other’s military training institutions and making exchanges of visit by senior services personnel. (ends)
India and Germany Sign Landmark Agreement on Defence Cooperation
(Source: India Press Information Bureau; issued Sept. 7, 2006)
India and Germany signed a landmark agreement last night to change the contour of relationship from a ‘buyer-seller’ to that of partners. Shortly after signing the agreement with his German Counterpart Dr. Franz Josef Jung in Berlin, the Defence Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee expressed confidence that “the relationship will graduate from the level of buyer-seller relationship to that of co-production, joint development of products and transfer of technology.”
The Agreement aims to establish a strategic dialogue for the benefit of he Armed Forces at the level of Defence Secretaries. Conscious of ‘the significance of international military cooperation as an important element of security’, this group called the India- Germany High Defence Committee (HDC), will meet once a year, alternately, in India and Germany. Under the Under the HDC, the two countries will form three sub- groups to focus on Strategic Defence Cooperation, Defence Technical cooperation and Military to Military Cooperation.
The Strategic Defence Cooperation subgroup will be headed by Joint Secretary level officials of the two countries and will deal with subject areas e.g., security and defence policy, leadership concepts, disaster relief and humanitarian assistance.
The Defence Technical cooperation sub-group will look at issues such as defence technology cooperation, defence business cooperation, exhange of information on armament procurement projects, including project related development and exchange of information on defence technological research and technology in both countries.
The Military-to-military cooperation sub-group will deal with issues such as standard and advanced training of military and civilian members of the armed forces, organizational structure of the armed forces, maintenance of armed forces in peace time, military medicine, military geo-information affairs, environmental protection in the armed forces, deployment of the armed forces within the UN Framework, disaster relief and humanitarian assistance. The co-chairs of the three sub-groups will report to the HDC on their deliberations and bilateral work programme for approval.
Shri Mukherjee said that “with the signing of the MoU and establishment of High Defence Committee, a regular institutional mechanism is established”. Describing Germany as a “trusted and valued friend of India”, the Defence Minister said that the already existing high degree of economic and commercial cooperation with Berlin has now been extended to the areas of defence and security. Earlier in the day, Shri Mukherjee took a walk through the German Parliament building, the Reichstag and watched the proceedings of the Bundestag which was incidentally discussing the defence budget for the year.
The German term Reichstag refers to the building, while the term Bundestag refers to the institution. The Reichstag building in Berlin was constructed to house the Reichstag, the original parliament of the German Empire. It was opened in 1894 and housed the Reichstag until 1933. The Reichstag as a parliament dates back to the Holy Roman Empire and ceased to act as a true parliament in the years of Nazi Germany (1933-1945). It again became the seat of the German parliament in 1999 after a reconstruction led by internationally renowned architect Norman Foster.
Shri Mukherjee watched the proceedings of the House for about half an hour. When the Speaker of the House announced the presence of the Defence Minister in the visitors’ gallery, there was thunderous applause from the members.
-ends-
Whatever works in getting what the service wants…
India to Fast-Track Procurement of New Combat Aircraft
Defence Ministry to Place Order for 126 Aircraft: Mukherjee
(Source: ddi Indian government news; issued Oct. 3, 2006)
Keeping in mind the threat perception in the region, Defence minister Pranab Mukherjee said that the government will issue request for proposals for purchasing 126 multi-role aircraft for replacement and upgradation in the air force.
Replacements would be made as the government was aware of the need for upgradation of the ageing fleet, he told reporters in Kolkata on the sidelines of a seminar “Defence – industry partnership in human resource development.”
Keeping in mind the threat perception in the region, the ministry would induct 126 additional aircraft for which the Request for Proposals would be issued, he said.
Mukherjee said some state governments were not carrying out rehabilitation of ex-servicemen in accordance with the norms laid down.
States like Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh had allotted substantial land to ex-servicemen and preference was given to them in various state government jobs, he said.
The seminar was organised by CII and Directorate General of Resettlement
-ends-
In real life, if a MKI does get to WVR, that alone is a screw-up- here, these were just a couple of strictly WVR fights.
Anyways, any news on the RAF-IAF exercise?
Yeah check!
That would be the mission planner’s fault, not the pilot’s fault.
Dont the pilots take active part in the mission planning, ie on charting out their own route, tactics etc? :confused:
I’d wager MiG has some old airframes already which it can flog to Arab/ African countries, plus India may not want to go for the MiG-35 because of the amount of investment it has undertaken in local spares production, excerpts below:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Info/11BRD.html
Tucked away in Ojhar, 25 miles off Nasik on the Mumbai- Agra highway is 11 Base Repair Depot, one of the eight base repair depots of the Indian Air Force under overall control and supervision of the Maintenance Command, Nagpur. To the average Ojharite, this out-of-bounds “sarkari daftar” is an enigma. Save for the daily bouts of earth shaking decibels of aircraft engines being tested and deafening din of low flying aircraft, like the puzzled Ojharite, most of the nation is unaware of the performance every day by this industrial techno-yard of the Indian Air Force, where two variants of the MiG get a new life.
Since 1987, No. 11 BRD has set off an ambitious programme to overhaul the MiG variants with indigenous knowhow, developed by a qualified and highly motivated team of innovators that the nation can be proud of. The men in blue here are out to falsify not just notions and mindsets but nerve-racking, cynical calculations on a burdening, jinxed aircraft fleet. It is not just indigenisation that provides the vital edge to this overhaul project, but the mind-boggling cost-cuts it bestows on the exchequer in the MiG modernisation programme.
Stunning are the figures doled out by Air Commodore R.R. Bhardwaj, the Air Officer Commanding of No. 11 BRD. “The overhaul programme for the MiG-23s and MiG-29s, which would have cost over Rs 400 crores if undertaken in Russia is incurring not more than Rs 50 crores at No. 11 BRD, all with indigenous technology, under the highest quality standards and total technical life enhancement programmes and that too in the quickest possible time”. He can afford to be exuberant when his men confidently develop Life Extension Technology for a meagre Rs 50 lakhs, the alternative in Russia costing some hundred crores. Till date, 191 overhauled MiG-23s and 51 MiG- 29s have rolled out of the Depot and are back in IAF squadrons.
If lAF’s mastery on overhauling of the airframe and avionics are on abundant display here, senior officers concede that engines are still a far cry. Of the blighted MiG fleet in the IAF, it is the MiG-23 that really takes the epithet of ‘frequent crasher’, with the highest fatality rate. With the MiG-23 engines drawing flak from all quarters. No. 11 BRD had taken care to stay away from the fuss, bothering more on avionics and airframes and leaving the engine part to the HAL engineers at Koraput and No. 4 BRD in Kanpur.
However, it was sheer global political circumstances that changed 11 BRD’s fortunes. With collapse of the Soviet Union, MiG spares were not easily forthcoming, forcing the BRDs to work on indigenising rotables and aggregates of avionics and airframes. Added to that, discrepancies arose in the Russian deliveries of spares and outsourced jigs and fixtures. When the Russian supplies became a problem, an Inter Agency Group for Life Extension was formed to work on indigenous life extension technology, “Russians were unyielding about pricing and had demanded Rs 400 crore for the whole process. When options ran out, we decided to take matters into our hands. What Russians did for Rs 22 crore for each aircraft, we did for below Rs 2 crore with our own indigenous life enhancement technology,” said a senior officer.
Once “life extension” was declared as a thrust area, defence research labs throughout the country, HAL engineers and even IIT researchers were brought into the team for the operation. What started as a operation for life cycle enhancement soon metamorphosed into a movement for self reliance. There was not a single part of the aircraft that missed an attempt to indigenise. Other than the engine, everything from rotables, mandatory spares, radars to alloys and metals, BRD’s intrepid men “Indianised” anything in the MiG-23 on which they laid their hands!
Air Marshal KS Bhatia, then AOC-in-C Maintenance Command, after the inagural test flight of MiG-23BN which was overhauled at 11BRD in 1988
Inside the operations hanger, the studious engineers of 11 BRD did not strive long to unearth the latent critical problems with the aircraft. The culprit in most critical snags of Russian made aircraft, says Wing Commander Tiwari, was the power supply module. With this ascertained, the only option left was to also indigenise this system. Interestingly, the 11 BRD- developed power supply module is “six times cheaper with performance ten times better than the Russian one”. Indigenisation itself was no silly game for the BRD men. Keeping a tradition of developing low cost spares. No. 11 BRD developed indigenous spares and components for well under Rs 1 crore when for those parts Russians had charged Rs 8-12 crores. It is self-reliance that has won laurels for 11 BRD. On constant move, the effort was always to indigenise as many parts as possible. The great deal of effort and success shown in this self-reliance foray is demonstrated by the fact that 11 BRD has achieved 96 percent indigenisation of the critical mandatory spares for MiG-29s.
A MiG-29 waiting to be inspected after overhaul at Ojhar.
Sqn Ldr Sharnik Manna, who oversees overhauling of MiG- 29s describes: “The aircraft after wheeling in, is stripped of if engine, avionics, wings, fins and only the airframe’s skeleton remains. The MiG-29s have over 2000 types of parts, including nuts and bolts, and even the most minute one is arranged checked and the rotables are identified,” While all the rubberised items are replaced, the non-rubberised ones are recycled through a process of cleaning, followed by micro testing involving stringent quality standards to search for cracks and weigh’ dimensions and electroplated before being retained for reuse The whole set of looms or cables running across the aircraft are replaced completely. The engine is sent to the HAL’S Koraput plant and once back after overhaul, is checked with advanced internal scanning process before being integrated in the aircraft .
The whole process takes 296 days before test flight for the MiG-29s and 256 days for the MiG-23s. Although both aircraft go through similar process, the MiG-23s, with its exclusive swing-wing technology has to move through 14 stations of levels, while the MiG-29s have 13 stations. With minor differences in procedures, both aircraft go through disassembling in the first 2 to 4 stations, defect investigation’ between 4 to 8, rotable reassembling between 8 to 10 and total functional checks between 11 and 13. During all these stages the various processes are subjected to rigorous quality testing both by IAF and by external organisations, before going for independent post overhaul checking at the 13th or 14th level and the aircraft then taxied out for its first flight.
Concealed in a discreet comer is a specialist section working on composite materials for the MiG aircraft. With carbon glass as the ingredients, the BRD team has developed composite exteriors for the wings and fins of the aircraft to replace heavier alloys and metals, thereby reducing in considers amount weight of the aircraft and in the process, add tremendously to its speed and manoeuvrability.
Fifteen Years after the first MiG-23BN was overhauled at Ojhar, the type still continues to be sent for overhauls.
The day Vayu visited No. 11 BRD, one of the test pilots at 11 BRD, Sqn Ldr Chauhan was preparing for a third flight test sortie. “Usually an overhauled aircraft will have three test flights before being given the nod for return to the operational squadron. It is the test pilot who finally decides on giving the green signal. The aircraft has to satisfy all his parameters before the final affirmation.” Later, Vayu was to witness an impressive take and manoeuvring by Sqn Ldr Chauhan who was testing auto-pilot systems of a MiG-29.
Well strictly by the definition of the term it was DACT, but nothing particularly serious..a couple of the F-16 pilots went up and tangled with the MKIs in WVR etc..
So everybody’s sharpening their claws today at the same time ? Take a number peepul 😀
Just kicking around the old football! 😀
Not again :o. Come on guys, let him have his day. Its meaningless to argue.
LOL, I agree, but he lets his mouth get the better of him..more claims, little facts..
Back to topic, I recall reading that even during Cope India 05, Su-30 MKI’s were used only for few sorties and its Su30K which participated full fledge in the excercise (I will try to find the actual story and post it later. It was GOI press release). So for the first time SU30MKIs will be used in excercise with Western Airforce.
Update – Found the link. Its Indian Embassy in Washington.
As mentioned previously by Kalyan, its likely to be media misreportage, and only the K’s are involved.
Also MKIs were in WVR DACT @ Cope India-II.
No, was shared by yoyur very own Indian media who reported the evaluation of Chinese AWACs in Pak, AFM thsi month reports the news. Obviously when the order is confirmed we can jump up and down more.
Put up the exact proof of the induction of 8 Chinese AWACs. Your claims apart.
The fact is even with 2-3 “indigenous” AWACs, 6 Phalcons (if extra are ordered), that will still leave Indian with
1) fewer AWACs then PAF
Yet to be proven.
2) Much larger area to defend
AWACs are for the TBA area. The rest are getting more GBAD radars. Its yet to be proven whether your birds can get through any decent screen!
3) Chinese border to look after
See above.
4) IL-76 airframe much more maintence intensive and having more down time and less availability then SAAB 2000 airframe of Erieye
Clutching @ straws here! 😀
In the same vein, the Il-78 has more space for a more powerful radar array, more powerful ESM system etc, longer endurance etc.
Please try and argue logically rather then posting links to “amusing” wikepedia words, its would do yoru much shattered credibility a world of good.
The wikipedia words are suitable for their purpose, which is to look through your jingoistic bombast & point to the exact meaning therein.
As regards credibility- I am still awaiting the proof for your (in)famous claims of PAF having integration experience of American BVR on Chinese planes. Or for that matter, the 8 Chinese AWACS being purchased.
I am sorry if math is a difficult subject.
Cant help you there, you should have paid more attention in school!
IAF cureently has 3 Phalcons on order, may order 2-3 more, and its “indegious” AWACs is still a non entity.
Actually, its 3 Phalcons on order, 3 AEW being developed, plus two probable Phalcons- thats ~ 6- 8.
PAF had 6 Erieye on firm order
Which we all know of..
and 6-8 Chinese AWACs is waiting to be confirmed. What part of this equationis puzzelling you?
Really? Did the PAF chief call you yesterday night to share this claim? 😀
Perhaps..
REgards,
USS.
Did you get my PM?
Completely wrong. With 6 Erieyes on order and a “larger number” of Chinese AWACs on order (according to AFM this month) PAF may well be operating 10-12 AWACs compared to 3-5 for India. Taking into account Pakistan is also a 5th of teh size of India. I dont think so many AWACs are needed just to cover Pakistan. Of course, it may help you sleep better if you think we WONT be deploying these aggressivley in the counter air role over India.
Rotflmao…10-12 vs- 3-5! 😀
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=420702
IAF mulls purchase of French Mirage fighters
NEW DELHI, OCT 5 (PTI)
The Indian Air Force is exploring purchase of French Mirage fighters to maintain an effective airpower strength as an interim measure in the wake of delays in finalising the contract for buying 126 multi-role Combat Aircraft.“We are in negotiations with France for supply of some number of Mirage-2000-5,” Air Chief SP Tyagi told newsmen here. Negotiations had also been revived with Qatar for purchase of 12 Mirage fighters, he said.
IAF is taking these emergency measures in the wake of reports that its fighting squardon strength has plunged to a low of 39 squardons and reports that Pakistan is on the threshhold of buying more F-16 fighters from United States. ( comment: dork media! the allocated squadron strength per GOI is 39 squadrons!)
Tyagi disclosed that India was close to wrapping up a deal to purchase quick reaction surface to air missiles from Israel. Under the deal, India proposes to buy 18 Spyder missiles system in a deal worth more than Rs 1,800 crores.
Asserting that Government was “alive and responsive” to requests by the IAF on measures to tide over depleting force levels, he also outlined that Hindustan Aeronautics had increased production of Sukhoi-30MKI fighters. He also said that IAF would go in for purchase of six more IL-78 Mid-Air refuellers.
While saying that the proposed induction of lethal military platforms and system in the country’s neighbourhood was a cause of concern, the Air Chief said that these arms purchases by Pakistan had already been factored by the country’s strategic planners.
Maintaining that “our vision” is to acquire “strategic reach” and trans oceanic capability, Tyagi said IAF was preparing for induction of British Hawk advanced jet trainers and airborne and early warning system (Awacs) aircraft by next year.
He also said that the force would be getting 20 additional upgraded Jaguars and 20 indigenious Light Combat aircraft by 2009.
“We are also taking measures to upgrade our air superiority MIG-29 and Mirage-2000 fighters,” the Air Chief said. Though, he did not not elaborate on interim purchases of Mirages, highly-placed sources said the effort was being made to go in for Government to Government deal.
A high-level French delegation is in town for negotiations on the deal.
Modernisation and upgradation is not not being confined to fighters, Tyagi said outlining that from next year IAF would be inducting 80 new helicopters as well as initiating measures to upgrade it present fleet of Russian Mi-17 helicopters, An-32 medium lift and IL-76 heavy lift transport aircraft.
On AWACS induction, Tyagi, who recently visited Israel to oversee the building of the aircraft by a three way joint collaboration between Israel, Russia and India, said preparatory work on the project was going on for setting up of special labs and installations for data receiving.
DN
Posted 10/02/06India’s HAL Seeks Foreign Partners for Building UAVs
By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI, NEW DELHIIndia’s state-owned aircraft manufacturer, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL), for the first time is seeking overseas partners to collaborate and possibly co-produce unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Requests for information have been sent to more than a dozen aircraft manufacturers in France, Israel, Italy, Singapore, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States. HAL wants a partner with which it can build a family of UAVs.
A senior HAL executive said the UAVs would need to meet domestic requirements of the Indian Defence Forces, Coast Guard and Border Security Force, as well as for export to military and civilian customers.
The executive said HAL is putting up initial funding for the program, but details were not available.
The three variants planned are high- and medium-altitude long-endurance (HALE/MALE) UAVs, short-range mini/micro drones, and unmanned combat aerial vehicles.
The HALE/MALE aircraft would be equipped for intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance; communication and data relay; and scientific and meteorological operations. It must be able to operate in all climates, day or night; have autonomous takeoff and landing from a runway; be capable of carrying guided weapons; have a payload capacity of 250-500 kilograms; and have a low radar and acoustic signature.
The mini/micro UAV mission profile is to include over-the-hill reconnaissance, surveillance, law enforcement and urban operations, with a maximum speed of up to 150 kilometers per hour, endurance of 30 to 120 minutes, reach an altitude of one kilometer and have a range of up to 50 kilometers.
The mission objectives of the unmanned combat aerial vehicle will be the suppression of enemy air defenses and deep penetration, with operational features to include a range of up to 2,000 kilometers and speed of up to 1,000 kilometers per hour.
India now operates Israeli-made Searcher-I, Searcher-II and Heron UAVs.
In the absence of airborne warning and control system aircraft, the Indian Defence Forces use UAVs in the northern state of Jammu and Kashmir, where glaciers prohibit the installation of radar. And the Navy has deployed Herons to monitor Pakistani naval activities.
The Defence Forces need more than 250 additional UAVs in the next 10 years. India also has developed its own UAVs — the Nishant and Lakshya —which are in the production stage. Twelve Nishants are now being built, with deliveries to begin next year. HAL is producing 25 Lakshyas for the three services and deliveries have begun.
A European industry executive here said India has great potential in the UAV arena and would be an attractive partner for overseas UAV makers.
This is the same ADE-IAI venture recast in a wider light with other manufacturers also invited.