not very clever of them to reveal king kongs appearance in the trailer (particularly when it looks so horridly done). Despite the film being rubbish, the Godzilla trailer at least built up some suspense. As did the early Jurassic Park teasers.
not very clever of them to reveal king kongs appearance in the trailer (particularly when it looks so horridly done). Despite the film being rubbish, the Godzilla trailer at least built up some suspense. As did the early Jurassic Park teasers.
There is no ‘glazing’ as such. This is more in the line of a sculpture than an attempt to reproduce the detail of an airframe, and as such is a wholly display for the middle of a roundabout.
There is an awful lot of detail on the model if we take a close look at photos so some attempt at realism, reminds me in a way of many classical marble statues where the eyes are left smooth and undetailed.
silver? even the glazing 🙂
Black Sheep squadron! Darn……….I thought that perhaps the chaps at the Masham brewery had sponsored the Old Flying Machine Company for a season 🙂
Just to let you all know whats happening.
The forum itself has so far donated around £1200 between members. Some more has been given or is being given by family and friends, and Steve’s employer is also sending some as well.
So a great big ‘Thank You’ goes out to you all.
So far the only money that has gone out has been to pay for the Chipmunk flypast, and the paypal fees of course were taken out for those who paid that way.
The beneficiaries of the fund are to be as follows:
1. A memorial bench.
2. A donation to the Radiography Department at Addenbrookes.
3. A donation to the Battle of Britain Monument.
4. A donation to the Grace Spitfire.
Three places I’m sure Steve would have approved of the money benefitting.
If anyone still wants to make a donation, you are welcome to of course. Details on this thread: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=45992&highlight=paypal
Snapper, thanks for collecting the money. Where will the bench be? Old Warden, Duxford or somewhere else perhaps?
Here are one or two pics from the 50s and 60s
1 Convair 340 PH-CGA
2 Boeing 377 Stratocruiser N1038V
3 Lockheed L-749 Constellation VH-EAD
4 De Havilland DH-114 Heron 2B G-AOGO
5 Convair 440 EC-AMR
6 Convair 440 D-ACAP
thanks for posting, makes a nice change from old aeroplanes with guns in the wings 😉
Imagine if the same effort put into this thread went into actual threads of historic content, will someone please just lock the thread and let it disappear.
Imagine if the same effort put into this thread went into actual threads of historic content, will someone please just lock the thread and let it disappear.
Caen would have been a better example John, Paris was hardly touched by allied bombing.
I met Paul Tibbets in March, he is not in anyway sorry for dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, why should he be, anymore than the guys who bombed other civilian targets. He was given a job to do and did it to the best of his abilities.
It’s always easy for people to criticise with the luxury of hindsight.
I agree completely Ian with the sentiment regards Paul Tibbets and his crew.
I’m not sure it’s always easy for people to criticise with the luxury of hindsight. Many historians in criticism of the use of the bomb often make a very good and well thought out case. Then again so do those for the use of the bomb. In my opinion that is, because im really not sure. Then are the ‘historians’ who know what will stir interest in a book. Takes all sorts.
Caen would have been a better example John, Paris was hardly touched by allied bombing.
I met Paul Tibbets in March, he is not in anyway sorry for dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, why should he be, anymore than the guys who bombed other civilian targets. He was given a job to do and did it to the best of his abilities.
It’s always easy for people to criticise with the luxury of hindsight.
I agree completely Ian with the sentiment regards Paul Tibbets and his crew.
I’m not sure it’s always easy for people to criticise with the luxury of hindsight. Many historians in criticism of the use of the bomb often make a very good and well thought out case. Then again so do those for the use of the bomb. In my opinion that is, because im really not sure. Then are the ‘historians’ who know what will stir interest in a book. Takes all sorts.
A question for any mod who wishes to answer,
If someone attends an airshow / event / museum and posts lots of images on historic but hoping to stimulate a discussion, will it be moved tot he photographics section or is at the posters discretion as to where it should go?
Same goes for a thread in the airshow section that generates more words than pictures, will that be moved to the historic side?
Best regards, Steve
I assumed it was FiFi and an American production.
Nothing was mentioned about the fact that there were British and Commonwealth troops fighting the Japanese, I’m not knocking the Yanks, but any reference to an invasion of the Japanese mainland seemed to infer that it was a totally US operation.
I thought that the idea was for UK troops to invade via Burma and SE Asia as Tiger Force.
Meanwhile, Fleet Air Arm aircraft from Royal Navy carriers were bombing and strafing the Japanese mainland up to the end of hostilities.
Apart from that it was a very chilling documentary, the blast scenes were horrific, my missus couldn’t watch it.
I was amazed that someone had survived the blast from only 260 yards away.
Despite the fact that a Nuclear weapon had not been used in action before, I didn’t appreciate before how risky the operation was to the crew, having to arm the device in mid-air was terrifying.
Having spent all my life living through the Cold War, mostly in prime target areas, it made me cringe, particularly when I remember my father planning to turn our bathroom into a shelter during the Cuban missile crisis.
It was gratifying after the programme to watch the news, to see how the good old Royal Navy had been allowed to help to rescue the Russian submariners, we live in hope then.
That’s nice, a genuine steam roller just went chugging past the window.
The B-29 seems to have been Hawg Wild (interior shots etc) whilst flying sequences seem to be CGI (and at times I might add, very good CGI considering the likely budget of such a programme). I think the documentary was a British production. It didnt feel like an American production in my opinion.
Best Regards, Steve
The Japanese civilians killed in the raids didn’t “deserve’ to die any more than the English families killed during the blitz on London, the French in Paris, or the Americans in Honolulu.
Yes obviously. Thats perfectly true. A life is a life. English, French, German whatever.
Goodnight,
The Japanese civilians killed in the raids didn’t “deserve’ to die any more than the English families killed during the blitz on London, the French in Paris, or the Americans in Honolulu.
Yes obviously. Thats perfectly true. A life is a life. English, French, German whatever.
Goodnight,