The seats LH’s 744’s are a lot nicer than in their short haul fleet. They are cloth, mind you, but comfortable nonetheless. And no, they don’t have PTV’s. If they are currently in the process of retrofitting, then that’s a different story. However, when I flew them, they didn’t.
I was going to respond to Kabir’s 2nd to last post, but you took care of it Saab, thanks. Kabir, I respect everything you have to say, you know your stuff. But seriously, if everybody did things the same way, the world would be a boring place. “Variety is the spice of life,” one of my graduate professors used to tell me. As long as you’re not doing things illegally, which I’m sure Branson is not, tactics out of the norm are refreshing.
Not a fan of names, per se, I just like Sir Winston.
London Churchill, THAT IS NICE!!! I very much approve. I like Trafalgar, as well. Named after the square, or is the square named after a person that I’m not familiar with?
You’d have to cut the name down to 3 letters, however, unless they reserved a special 4-letter code, just for the sake of LHR2.
I should have known that was JFK, shame on me! The runway to the left there is the one I’ve always taken off on, I fly in there enough!
Guys, save all the publicity talk for the other thread, no need for 2 of the same. As far as painting it silver goes, they couldn’t do that if they wanted to fly supersonic. AF doesn’t apply, since they’re colours are all white anyhow (even though this can be debated at times, even on Concorde!), but why do you think BA’s Concorde’s never donned the blue and grey scheme? Because the paint would just peal right off when they hit supersonic. The only time the Concorde was painted in a non-white scheme, was when Pepsi chartered it about 6 years ago, some of you might remember. It was painted all blue, except for the wings. Those flights were all flown at subsonic speeds, or else that blue paint would have come right off. The reasoning behind this is, white doesn’t get as hot as any other color because it reflects the sun’s rays, it doesn’t aborb them.
To say that Virgin is not a class airline is flat out ludicrous. I’ve never flown them, but their reputation from those who have flown them speaks for itself. I’ve flown Singapore and I don’t think they’d invest in 49% stake in some schmuck airline. Saab, I agree with your take on Virgin 100%. Ditto on Kev’s take on Concorde, you pretty much took the words out of my mouth. Mongu, I typically agree with everything you say, with few exceptions. You didn’t disappoint here either. I’ll throw my own 2 cents in here, no pun intended. So Branson offered one lousy pound, big deal? Is it a gimmick? No. Is he getting publicity from it? Probably. Does he think anyone, let alone BA, will take him seriously? Probably not. That’s just Branson. This from a man who drove a tank across the Harbour Bridge in Sydney to celebrate the start-up of Virgin Blue. He may come across as cocky at times, but so what? In today’s society it’s good for a high profile figure, and CEO of an energetic, innovative company to have some personality. Does that mean that his company and his person have any less class than British Airways? God, I hope not! As far as “insulting” and showing “more respect to the grand flying lady;” please gentlemen, are we talking about a form of transportation or Queen Elizabeth, here?
Last summer, I flew SIA from AMS to SYD via SIN, and I was looking forward to my 2 hour and 45 minute layover in SIN so I could go into the lounge and have a shower and relax after a 13 hour flight. Well, after boarding we were informed the long runway was not in use and being a very heavy and long flight, we would either have to unload some cargo or request special permission from the airport to use the runway. 2 hours later, we took off. So much for my layover, which was down to about 45 minutes and only had enough time to pretty much get off the plane, go to the bathroom, and walk across the very large SIN terminal to get to my connecting flight.
What 2 airports are those?
They can encourage airlines to use other airports, London or otherwise, till they’re blue in the face. The bottom line is, Heathrow slots are like gold. Airlines aren’t going to just give them up. Look what happened to TWA after they sold their Heathrow slots in ’91? They got swallowed up by the same airline they sold them to.
I pound, that’s it?
Kind of went off the subject there, going back on the subject; Will Branson re-aply the “NO WAY BA/AA!” to the new silver scheme in the wake of this approval?
T5, I had a delay at Montego Bay airport, as well a few years back. Not nearly as long as yours, but a delay nonetheless. I don’t remember what the reasoning was, but we were sitting in the airplane for a good 2 hours before we took off. Inside the terminal, it wasn’t very “user friendly,” to say the least. The facilities were definitely lacking, so it’s a good thing you took your scrabble. I just recall there being no organization to the ques. Just a bunch of people squeezing in to the checkout desks. That’s how it was for Air Jamaica, at least. That being the hometown carrier, was pretty brutal on their part, to say the least. Probably the silliest reason I ever had for a delay, was when I flew Air Cananda from Montreal to Denver, we were delayed about 45 minutes because, “the wrong meals were loaded.” I started laughing. They had to unload the wrong meals and load the correct ones. I thought I had heard it all.
Actually, that Boeing looks really good! I think they could actually pull that off. They stretched the upper deck once, why not again? I think they’ll call it the 747-500, though, you can’t have any similarities to the airbus name.