dark light

greekdude1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 3,029 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A380-with wings #719834
    greekdude1
    Participant

    I’d say some of the pics were heavy! They even took my relatively quick broadband connection about 30 seconds to fully load! Great photos. I thought that the wing landing gear would have the 6 bogies and the ones on the body would have 4? I guess not.

    in reply to: A380-with wings #719843
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Yes, I did just favour a Boeing product over an Airbus product 😛

    Spoken like a true Boeing fan, out of the closet. 😉

    in reply to: photo of the day #719853
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Those are the Trent 800 engines Andrew.

    I thought the A340-500/600’s had Trent 500’s?

    in reply to: First Route flown by the A380 #719855
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Why would AF operate it on a ‘high demand’ route which they don’t currently operate?

    Nor have served for a while, for that matter. Note the cheatline in the pic.

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/514572/L/

    Greek , a little correction : it has to be JFK-ORY , since CDG was a corn field at this time 🙂

    Um, that too. 😮 Thanks for clearing that up, hand. Actually, I just realized there’s no way the outbound airport could have been JFK, as he was still alive. 😮 It was IDL-ORY.

    in reply to: Union threatens airport strike chaos #719890
    greekdude1
    Participant

    If you want some advice for your strikes in the UK , ask us , we have decades of experience 😀 🙂

    As does Greece. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: aircraft models #720079
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Try Bader models. Very high quality all in 1/200 scale, albeit, very expensive. They even do a PA 777!

    http://www.badermodels.com/index.htm

    in reply to: Jat Airways – UpDaTeD InFo #720092
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Jat should seriously buy a couple of wide-bodies, around four at least, and open flights to Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver, as well as their own flight to New York, Chicago and Los Angeles.

    Then two more lines, to Sydney and Melbourne.

    Lots of Serbs and other ex-Yugo’s leave in these cities, especially in Chicago.

    Sydney and Melbourne, I was aware of. Chicago makes sense, but I was not aware of a large number of Serbs/ex-Yugo’s living in the L.A. area. Any idea what suburb they have a tendency to congregate in? I.E. Glendale has loads of Armenians; Downey is where most of the Greeks are at, etc.

    in reply to: MD-11 does wheelie!! #720101
    greekdude1
    Participant

    I never knew boeing made the MD-11

    They ‘officially’ did when they acquired McDonnell Douglass in 1998.

    in reply to: Virgin USA air eyes NY, San Francisco #720527
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Interesting stuff, I misinterpreted your after taxes point to mean without taxes in my zest for an arument 😉

    Hey, no problem! 😉 Makes the forum a little more interesting.

    Another poor assumption of mine was the actual length of flights that jetBlue operated, 5 hours would be considered Intercontinental over here, most certainly not domestic!

    Indeed, Jetblue offers several coast to coast flights from both JFK and LGB. However, they operate smaller sectors, as well. I was just using that one to compare 2 particular routes served. Ironically, AA started flying between Long Beach and JFK, ONLY AFTER Jetblue established their LGB hub and initiated 6 daily roundtrips between it and their main hub, JFK.

    in reply to: Virgin USA air eyes NY, San Francisco #720574
    greekdude1
    Participant

    £40 round trip minus taxes for a flight in the states is not pretty spectacular for a LoCo, when 2p round trips minus taxes is becoming more and more commonplace over in the EU.

    That $75 I mentioned is including taxes, Mark, not minus. I don’t care what country you live in, that’s cheap! I’ve seen those 2p round trip fares you’re talking about on RyanAir. By the time you factor in all the taxes, it comes out to like 30quid, round trip. Very little difference between that and 75 bucks.

    At the moment there is little distinction between say JetBlue and AA, except JetBlue offer in flight entertainment.

    Ok, lets take a look at a particular route that they both serve, LGB-JFK. That’s a 5 hours flight. On AA, you will get fed a meal, and believe it or not, there will be IFE in the form of a movie plus some other programing before and after. On Jetblue, you will get the PTV’s, however no meal. Just blue tortilla chips on a 5 hour+ flight. Now you tell me the difference? As soon as AA starts giving out just pretzels on flights of that length, then I’ll agree that there is little difference between the two.

    Hold on! Aren’t Jetblue supposed to be the LoCo here?

    Indeed they are! See above paragraph.

    in reply to: Virgin USA air eyes NY, San Francisco #720736
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Perhaps proper LoCo wasn’t the best description, but even the basic Southwest Fares are extortinate for the service offered!

    It all depends. You get your fare far enough in advance, and you can fly for as little as $75 roundtrip, after taxes. That’s how it usually works with everybody, right? Certain amount of seats available at a certain price. As those get sold, then you have to purchase the higher priced seat.

    Like I said our flag carriers over here offer similar basic fares, and all the frills.

    Yeah, so? Our flag carriers do too. In fact, we even have quasi Low-frills/flag carriers where you have the low-fare structure airline like TED, but you still get all the FF perks/lounge access, etc. of the big boys. What a concept!

    in reply to: Swiss airline in spat with BA #720756
    greekdude1
    Participant

    It’s like a playground.

    I miss playing in the sandbox. 😉

    in reply to: SAS at EDI today #720761
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Do they not normally fly there?

    in reply to: Swiss airline in spat with BA #720805
    greekdude1
    Participant

    Pathetic as this may be, I can’t be remiss about posting my ‘short’ list of types flown:

    Lockheed:
    L-1011

    Boeing:
    727-200
    737-200/300/400/500/700/800
    747-100/200/300/400
    757-200
    767-200/300
    777-200

    Airbus:
    A300-200/600
    A310-200/300
    A319
    A320
    A321

    Douglas:
    DC-9
    MD-90
    DC-10-10/40

    Everything else:
    CRJ
    ATR42
    Emb-120
    Beech1900D
    J31
    J41
    Piper Cherokee

    There’s lots of overlap in terms of Airlines flown on particular types. I won’t even go there. Also, I might have flown on a 707 in 1976. This is still unconfirmed as I was 2 years old and I’m still hunting down timetables to confirm this.

    in reply to: Virgin USA air eyes NY, San Francisco #721026
    greekdude1
    Participant

    the USA needs a proper LoCo I think. Airlines such as Southwest and JetBlues basic fares are very similar to the basic fares of our flag carriers in Europe.

    This is completely false. If Southwest isn’t a proper loco, then there is no such thing.

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 3,029 total)