I’d say some of the pics were heavy! They even took my relatively quick broadband connection about 30 seconds to fully load! Great photos. I thought that the wing landing gear would have the 6 bogies and the ones on the body would have 4? I guess not.
Yes, I did just favour a Boeing product over an Airbus product 😛
Spoken like a true Boeing fan, out of the closet. 😉
Those are the Trent 800 engines Andrew.
I thought the A340-500/600’s had Trent 500’s?
Why would AF operate it on a ‘high demand’ route which they don’t currently operate?
Nor have served for a while, for that matter. Note the cheatline in the pic.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/514572/L/
Greek , a little correction : it has to be JFK-ORY , since CDG was a corn field at this time 🙂
Um, that too. 😮 Thanks for clearing that up, hand. Actually, I just realized there’s no way the outbound airport could have been JFK, as he was still alive. 😮 It was IDL-ORY.
If you want some advice for your strikes in the UK , ask us , we have decades of experience 😀 🙂
As does Greece. :rolleyes:
Try Bader models. Very high quality all in 1/200 scale, albeit, very expensive. They even do a PA 777!
Jat should seriously buy a couple of wide-bodies, around four at least, and open flights to Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver, as well as their own flight to New York, Chicago and Los Angeles.
Then two more lines, to Sydney and Melbourne.
Lots of Serbs and other ex-Yugo’s leave in these cities, especially in Chicago.
Sydney and Melbourne, I was aware of. Chicago makes sense, but I was not aware of a large number of Serbs/ex-Yugo’s living in the L.A. area. Any idea what suburb they have a tendency to congregate in? I.E. Glendale has loads of Armenians; Downey is where most of the Greeks are at, etc.
I never knew boeing made the MD-11
They ‘officially’ did when they acquired McDonnell Douglass in 1998.
Interesting stuff, I misinterpreted your after taxes point to mean without taxes in my zest for an arument 😉
Hey, no problem! 😉 Makes the forum a little more interesting.
Another poor assumption of mine was the actual length of flights that jetBlue operated, 5 hours would be considered Intercontinental over here, most certainly not domestic!
Indeed, Jetblue offers several coast to coast flights from both JFK and LGB. However, they operate smaller sectors, as well. I was just using that one to compare 2 particular routes served. Ironically, AA started flying between Long Beach and JFK, ONLY AFTER Jetblue established their LGB hub and initiated 6 daily roundtrips between it and their main hub, JFK.
£40 round trip minus taxes for a flight in the states is not pretty spectacular for a LoCo, when 2p round trips minus taxes is becoming more and more commonplace over in the EU.
That $75 I mentioned is including taxes, Mark, not minus. I don’t care what country you live in, that’s cheap! I’ve seen those 2p round trip fares you’re talking about on RyanAir. By the time you factor in all the taxes, it comes out to like 30quid, round trip. Very little difference between that and 75 bucks.
At the moment there is little distinction between say JetBlue and AA, except JetBlue offer in flight entertainment.
Ok, lets take a look at a particular route that they both serve, LGB-JFK. That’s a 5 hours flight. On AA, you will get fed a meal, and believe it or not, there will be IFE in the form of a movie plus some other programing before and after. On Jetblue, you will get the PTV’s, however no meal. Just blue tortilla chips on a 5 hour+ flight. Now you tell me the difference? As soon as AA starts giving out just pretzels on flights of that length, then I’ll agree that there is little difference between the two.
Hold on! Aren’t Jetblue supposed to be the LoCo here?
Indeed they are! See above paragraph.
Perhaps proper LoCo wasn’t the best description, but even the basic Southwest Fares are extortinate for the service offered!
It all depends. You get your fare far enough in advance, and you can fly for as little as $75 roundtrip, after taxes. That’s how it usually works with everybody, right? Certain amount of seats available at a certain price. As those get sold, then you have to purchase the higher priced seat.
Like I said our flag carriers over here offer similar basic fares, and all the frills.
Yeah, so? Our flag carriers do too. In fact, we even have quasi Low-frills/flag carriers where you have the low-fare structure airline like TED, but you still get all the FF perks/lounge access, etc. of the big boys. What a concept!
It’s like a playground.
I miss playing in the sandbox. 😉
Do they not normally fly there?
Pathetic as this may be, I can’t be remiss about posting my ‘short’ list of types flown:
Lockheed:
L-1011
Boeing:
727-200
737-200/300/400/500/700/800
747-100/200/300/400
757-200
767-200/300
777-200
Airbus:
A300-200/600
A310-200/300
A319
A320
A321
Douglas:
DC-9
MD-90
DC-10-10/40
Everything else:
CRJ
ATR42
Emb-120
Beech1900D
J31
J41
Piper Cherokee
There’s lots of overlap in terms of Airlines flown on particular types. I won’t even go there. Also, I might have flown on a 707 in 1976. This is still unconfirmed as I was 2 years old and I’m still hunting down timetables to confirm this.
the USA needs a proper LoCo I think. Airlines such as Southwest and JetBlues basic fares are very similar to the basic fares of our flag carriers in Europe.
This is completely false. If Southwest isn’t a proper loco, then there is no such thing.