Originally posted by Snapper
So why did they buy it then? They clearly didn’t know what it was when they did, so no change there.
They don’t know because they don’t care. They obviously put it in one of the most important ‘cities’ in the U.S., Lake Havasu, AZ. Huh? Anybody know where that is?
Originally posted by Snapper
And as they seem to turn it into pathetic-rugby, why do they need to armour plate themselves? Should play like real men. Ugly men with cauliflower ears that is.
I’m not going to clown on rugby, I’ve been to a few rugby matches in Australia, and those guys are tough. Any real fan of American football will admit how tough rugby is, as well. You can’t even compare rugby and ‘gridiron,’ however, so I’m not even going to waste my time. Two completely different sports. The reason for the ‘armour plating’ is obvious, if you know the game. If the NFL did not require its players to wear pads and helmets, you would have 5-10 deaths per year, minimum. We really don’t want that, do we?
Originally posted by Snapper
And as they seem to turn it into pathetic-rugby, why do they need to armour plate themselves? Should play like real men. Ugly men with cauliflower ears that is.
I’m not going to clown on rugby, I’ve been to a few rugby matches in Australia, and those guys are tough. Any real fan of American football will admit how tough rugby is, as well. You can’t even compare rugby and ‘gridiron,’ however, so I’m not even going to waste my time. Two completely different sports. The reason for the ‘armour plating’ is obvious, if you know the game. If the NFL did not require its players to wear pads and helmets, you would have 5-10 deaths per year, minimum. We really don’t want that, do we?
Originally posted by duxfordhawk
Besides you saw that sense of humour when we sold you a crappy old Bridge that you all thought was something special.
Nobody in America gives 2 $hits about the London Bridge, nor do they know what it is, if that’s what you’re referring to.
Originally posted by duxfordhawk
Besides you saw that sense of humour when we sold you a crappy old Bridge that you all thought was something special.
Nobody in America gives 2 $hits about the London Bridge, nor do they know what it is, if that’s what you’re referring to.
Originally posted by wannabe pilot
And the bar is that of an Airbus, can be used on a variety, but most likely to be A320 or A319.
The only Airbus types UA operates is the aforementioned A319/A320, so yeah.
With both nosewheel struts turning independantly as opposed to turning in tandem, I would think turning would be similar to an aircraft with a single strut, but perhaps not being capable of doing a complete 360.
Originally posted by mikeconnell
(this was quite important to us as this was my emigration flight).
Congratulations! Let me know how all your paperwork and everything goes. My wife is currently in the process of naturalization.
Originally posted by mikeconnell
IMHO the immediate rebooking was a very customer-friendly move by United. As you say, hotel accommodation would have cost less if it was needed. In the event I guess they must have wished they had not rerouted everyone, but that’s how the dice rolled.
Rather unrelated, but the first time I flew out of LHR with UA in ’01, I was booked on the last ORD flight of the day, although this was not final destination (I had 2 segments after ORD). Apparantly our flight was overbooked and they were asking for volunteers to bump. I attempted to get bumped and possibly get a voucher and whatnot, but because ORD was not my final destination, they probably factored that in, and figured they would have to pay for a hotel for me. Turns out they didn’t let me give up my seat. Oh well, I tried to be nice. 😎
My question is: Did the other 38 people on the flight ‘roll the dice’ not unlike yourself, or were there only a certain amount of seats on the AA flight (which is understandable)? United could have easily rolled the dice as well. They could have not transferred anybody onto the AA flight and potentially spent less money putting people up in hotels had their own fllight eventually get canceled. At that stage, I’m sure they would have spent slightly less on hotel accomodation rather than paying AA, but had a few more ****ed off pax, who wanted to get the hell out of Dodge, as a result.
I have no idea about profitability of Airlines. I know all the U.S. majors have been losing bigtime the last few years. I would think that EK is doing pretty well, seeing as they are expanding and purchasing new and used aircraft on a regular basis.
I personally don’t see an immediate viability for a 777 Freighter. The reason being is that you still have the 747-400F, now in an improved -ER configuration. Especially when you consider that the 747 was purposely designed to be a freighter with its raised deck and upward swinging nose door, it allows for larger container types to be loaded from the front that other freighters can’t take in the side door. With this available, there’s no way Boeing is going to bother developing a 777F to compete with one of its own products. Now if there is some aftermarket company that potentially con convert pax 777 into freighters, that’s a whole different argument.
I have wondered the same thing myself, Mike. A similar situation happened to me, albeit on a much shorter flight. Last Novemeber I was flying from Eugene, OR (EUG) to Phoenix, AZ (PHX) on UA (of course) via SFO. The flight out of Eugene was late which caused us to miss our connection in SFO. The next UA flight out of SFO to PHX was some 4 hours later, and being with the wife, I didn’t want to wait around that long. Had I been by myself, I wouldn’t care as SFO has great in-terminal viewing and outstanding facilities. At any rate, I was pretty upset when I found no-one at the UA customer service counter airside so I had to go landside. I told the agent my situation and knowing that America’s Worst, errr, America West flew the same routing, I asked the agent if he could put me on an earlier flight on HP. He called over to HP and asked if they had 2 seats available so he put us on that flight, which left 2 hours earlier than the next UA flight. Since the flight was only an hour and a half, I really didn’t care. Besides, I still got my UA mileage credit for that leg, even though it was on a different carrier. So yeah, back to original question, I don’t know what happens in that situation. If they have each others backs, even though they are competitors, that would be cool, in my opinion. As Mike mentioned, these scenarios happen to every airline.
Originally posted by KabirT
any possibility the new A330s will replace the older ones?
Their A330’s are less than 10 years old, why replace them already? I’m sure they have 744’s and A340’s in the fleet that are older.
Gentlemen (and lady),
I’m a regular in the commercial forum, but I jump in here occassionally just to see what’s up. I am not Aussie, but my wife is. Apparantly they voted about 2 years ago whether to break away from the Queen or not. The Queen won, so I don’t know if they want to do the same election again and obtain different results, or what.
Gentlemen (and lady),
I’m a regular in the commercial forum, but I jump in here occassionally just to see what’s up. I am not Aussie, but my wife is. Apparantly they voted about 2 years ago whether to break away from the Queen or not. The Queen won, so I don’t know if they want to do the same election again and obtain different results, or what.