Welcome Omar. I think it’s pretty obvious that Boeing is going to be very dependant on the 777 family in the future, along with the new 7E7. They have made it clear in the past that the ‘Superjumbo’ is not viable and they favor long-range twin jets as opposed to 4-holers. However, how much more can the 777 family grow? With the 5 versions currently on offer, they can really only shrink it to make it super long range. As it is, I think they’re pushing the envelope with the 777-200LR. I just think that ranges in upwards of 8,000 statute miles should be flown by 4-holers, but that’s just my opinion, and I surely don’t work for Boeing. If they were going to do this, they should have never made the initial ‘A-market’ version, or they should have classified it as the -100 series. That way, the ‘B-market’ model would have been the standard -200 and this new longer range model would be the -200ER. As it is, other than those initial orders, not too many of the ‘A-market’ versions have been ordered. United has a handful that they use on their domestic and Hawaii routes. SQ has quite a few, as well. Clearly the ‘B-market’ is the model of choice, as sales for any versions of the -300 haven’t been great, either.
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Why then did Airbus build the A330-300 and the A340-300, It’s only a different engine?
Airbus believe in “4 Engines 4 Long Haul.” The A340 was designed for longer routes. The A330 for was designed for slightly shorter, thinner routes.
Originally posted by BigVince76
I wish PAX on Russian flights didn’t clap and cheer when the plane lands, really is very disconcerting.
It seemed like every flight I took in the 80’s, everybody would clap on landing. I never flew on any Russian types, either. These were on western types, like 747’s, 727’s, L1011’s, A300’s, etc.
That grammar looks almost too good to be him. I suspect someone else. Inquiring parties can PM me and we can discuss it.
I.P. or not, I have suspicisions that he has already returned with an alias.
Originally posted by Bhoy
Ah well, I’ve got tickets to the Scottish Cup final against Dunfermline next Month, so look out for another photo report of the Incredible Travelling Tims…
Nice, always look forward to the photo reports.
Originally posted by Bhoy
The Continental has the better looking engines of the 2 75’s… 😉 :p
NO!! 😉
On a darker note, what’s with Celtic getting bounced from the UEFA cup? Very disappointing. I hope Newcastle takes it.
I have very intrigued by this aircraft since the first day I saw a picture of it. The IL-96-300M with the ‘western’ avionics you describe, Ja, also was fitted with the same P&W engines found on the C-17, plus a stretched fuselage. It’s a shame that more of these weren’t produced, other than the one freighter example that used to make appearances.
Originally posted by wannabe pilot
Great pictures, particularly like the Uzbekistan one 😀
I agree 100%! Those blue engines look especially nice considering they are Pratts. 😎
Originally posted by Ren Frew
Sounds like another excuse for a trip to LAX for me then ?:D
I concurr.
Originally posted by batbay
Apart from the accident aspect, I was very surprised to read that Emirates were buying seven year old aircraft from other airlines.Singapore Airlines “hand me downs” – not quite what Emirates would like publicised I think:o
Why not? SQ keep their aircraft in immaculate condition. Besides, these 10-odd ex SQ A343’s were readily available to EK as they needed an immediate boost in capacity but didn’t have to wait for new aircraft to come off the line. Was this example the only one of its type thus far with EK, or have they gotten some of the others, as well? When did they enter service?
Re: Re: Swiss would be a problem
Originally posted by Jeanske_SN
Brussels is the most modern airport of Europe.
Couldn’t the new ATH also potentially fall into this category, Jeanske?
Another great addition to LAX. All the Indians I know that live in this area usually fly SQ, TG, KE or Asiana via the Pacific to get to India. This gives them another option now. On a similar note, how is Air India allowed to sell tickets on the JFK-LHR route, with no continuation to Mumbai? Doesn’t this go against Bermuda II?
I never doubted your info, Paul. However, when you say that Jeanske was incorrect with his info, he was technically correct. Originally, the -400D’s did not have winglets, which is the point he was trying to make, I believe. So in saying that, he is correct. However, when they are/were converted to -400 Standard, winglets are added.
Whoa! I think we need to change your name to “TowBarBender!” 😀