dark light

fulcrum-aholic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 340 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Can planes get any better? #2511908
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    And always remember that if 9g was standing in the manual, the maximum tolerated load would be more like 14g. Of course with permanent deformation, but some airframes make it to 11-13g without (Mirage 2000, Eurofighter).

    …wouldn’t it be interesting IF the airframes were able to repair themselves?? remember “Christie” or “Christine” from the 80s (red cadillac)??

    in reply to: Any good shows/series out there ? #2513143
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    used to enjoy from the Discovery Channel Wings and the one mentioned Wings Of The Red Star. Beyond 2000, I think, used to be good, too, when they’d cover military jets. Missed the old days.

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2515589
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    [QUOTE=contrailjj;1157405]Nope, sorry Fulcrum, just another US civie – but appears to be ferrying back to Europe. (The aircraft IS for sale – and if memory doesn’t deceive me, this aircraft was also one of Pilatus’ demonstrators early in its life).

    http://www.controller.com/listings/detail.aspx?OHID=1098035

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2515616
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Swiss Air Force??

    Pilatus PC-7 stopping by to Iqaluit, NU, CANADA. Swiss Air Force??

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2515925
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    they ought to call it, “Komodo Dragon,” because it’s long nose and the cockpit does look like a komodo dragon’s head.

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2516370
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    thanks, contrailjj…

    i’m not into aircraft recognition as much as i used to back then during my teen years/early adulthood. but i haven’t lost interest with all types of planes that would land in Iqaluit every once in a while.

    in reply to: Nationality ID please! #2516406
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    US ARMY?!

    noticed an unusual dark-colored aircraft stopping by to Iqaluit, NU, CANADA. used to seeing CAF Hercules & Aurora with their dark-coloured shemes, but a small aircraft caught my attention. by the way, what the heck are those ‘sticks’ sticking out on the nose?

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2518609
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Construction of the PAK FA to be started soon

    17.08.2007

    Developers of the perspective air complex of front aviation (PAK FA), or Russian 5th generation multi-role combat aircraft will start manufacturing a pre-production model in the near future. Design documentation is ready and delivered to the manufacturer. According to the Commander of the Russian Air Force general-colonel Alexander Zelin all technical problems are being solved according to the schedules specified by the State Arms Program 2015, which specifies the parameters of creation of the new aircraft and the terms of their tests.

    Noteworthy, the Commander emphasized that there is no need to speed up the process taking the risk of making technical mistakes. The program is financed 100% and in due time. The First Vice-Premier Sergey Ivanov himself announced that PAK FA will take off in 2008. Time wise Russian plane lags behind the US F-22 and JSF (F-35), but Russian designers keep saying that PAK FA will be not the first, but the best.

    Commander of the Air Force also confirmed that Russia does not need to accelerate the PAK FA program in the context of the plans of the US to deploy its fifth generation F-22 in Alaska. According to the press-service of the corporation Lockheed Martin several fifth generation F-22 Raptors were already put on duty in Alaska.

    Let’s remind that that F-22 program was once suspended in early 90s and re-opened just recently. According to some unofficial military sources in Russia one of the reasons why it was suspended was the super efficient performance of the Russian air-defense complex S-300, which at that time was demonstrated for the first time at the international show in Abu-Dhabi. The designer of S-300 Boris Bunkin suggested holding immediate comparison tests between S-300 and the US patriot. The Americans refused. Building a 120 million dollars worth aircraft which can be hit down by a single missile was economically senseless.

    Something must have changed in the US technology and in the beginning of this century F-22 was finished. However, a lot of things changed in Russia too. Several days ago first S-400 outperforming S-300 times fold were commissioned with the Air Defense Units near Moscow.

    Yuri Seleznev
    Pravda.Ru

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2518610
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    [QUOTE=RIDIM;1151236]If this site is correct…

    http://warfare.ru/?catid=255&linkid=1600

    …thanks for the site for everyone to scroll through. looks very interesting, too.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion July-September 2007 #2525565
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Lockheed Martin offers the F-35 to India

    24 July 2007

    American military aviation major Lockheed Martin has offered India its state-of-the-art, fifth generation, stealth-capable fighter aircraft, the F-35 Lightening II Joint Strike Fighter. The company, which is in the running for India’s offer to buy 126 multi-role combat aircraft (MRCA), is trying to further sweeten the deal, having offered the F-16 for the contract.

    The F-35 is descended from the X-35 of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme, funded by the US, the UK, and others. It is designed and built by a consortium led by Lockheed Martin with BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman. The technology demonstrator flew in 2000; and a production prototype flew on 15 December 2006.

    Last week, top executives from Lockheed Martin met officials from India’s Ministry of Defence and told them that the US government had agreed to make the F-35 Lightening-II available for the IAF’s 5th generation fighter contract. Lockheed Martin’s Vice President for Business Development Rob Weiss said after the meeting that the F-35 would be in the reckoning much beyond the induction of the 126 MRCA planes, as the country’s security experts have been struggling to find partners to develop futuristic 5th generation fighters.

    New Delhi has talking to Moscow for joint development and joint investment in next generation fighters, but the Russian concepts of these fighters are only on the drawing board at present. Americans started development of the F-35 in early 2000, with an initial cost outlay of US $50 billion. The new generation fighters will be inducted into the US Air Force by the end of 2009 or in early 2010.

    “In the next few years a number of countries will join the F-35 programme and the IAF is welcome,” Weiss said. The F-35 fighter uses stealth to pick and choose engagements while reaming undetected by enemy defence systems. It has embedded antennae, aligned edges, internal weapons, as well as special coatings and material.

    The designers say that the F-35 fighter will have the most powerful sensor suite ever, with a seamless real world and real-time 360-degree display of the battle space to turn the pilots into ‘tacticians rather than technicians’. If new countries joined the F-35 programme, the US could be open to delivery of new generation fighters within the next decade.

    They said if the IAF chose the Lockheed Martin world’s best selling fighter F-16 fighting flacons, it could “position India to be ready to receive advanced technologies incorporated in the F-35’s.” Lockheed Martin officials said lot of new technologies being tested on F-35 would be leveraged in the new generation F-16 Block 50 fighters.

    On India’s decision to raise the offset limit in purchase of the 126 new fighters to 50 per cent, Weiss said his company was confident of meeting this target. “We have met offset requirements totalling US $40 billion in 37 countries,” he said. He also said Lockheed was ready to support IAF’s lifecycle needs and for technology transfer. “Fighting falcons are already being produced in five countries,” he emphasised.

    On the proposed sale of six C130J transport aircraft to India for use by special forces, the Lockheed Martin has announced that a letter of agreement was expected to be signed by the end of this year. Deliveries of the aircraft would start 30 months after the contract was signed; first deliveries would be by 2011. The company’s long range maritime reconnaissance aircraft — P3C Orion — has been dropped from the Indian Navy’s request for proposals.

    In the meanwhile, the F-35C variant of Lockheed Martin’s Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme has passed its air system critical design review (CDR). A key milestone following a series of subsystem reviews, it gives the development team behind F-35C — a conventional take-off and landing aircraft for carrier-borne operations — the green light to proceed toward production of three test and evaluation units, said a company spokesman

    F-35 details

    General characteristics

    * Crew: 1
    * Length: 50 ft 6 in (15.37 m)
    * Wingspan: 35 ft 0 in (10.65 m)
    * Height: 17 ft 4 in (5.28 m)
    * Wing area: 459.6 ft² (42.7 m²)
    * Empty weight: 26,000 lb (12,000 kg)
    * Loaded weight: 44,400 lb (20,100 kg)
    * Max takeoff weight: 60,000 lb (27,200 kg)
    * Powerplant: 1 Pratt & Whitney F135 afterburning turbofan
    * Dry thrust: 28,000 lbf (128 kN)
    * Thrust with afterburner: 43,000 lbf (191 kN)

    Performance

    * Maximum speed: >Mach 1.8 (1,200 mph, 1,931 km/h)
    * Range: 1,200 nautical miles (1,400 miles, 2,200 km) on internal fuel
    * Combat radius: 600 nautical miles (690 miles, 1,110 km)
    * Rate of climb: Not publicly available
    * Wing loading: 91.4 lb/ft² (446 kg/m²)
    * Thrust/weight: (with full fuel) 0.968; (with 50 per cent fuel) 1.22

    Armament

    * 1 GAU-12/U 25 mm cannon mounted internally with 180 rounds in the F-35A, and fitted as an external pod with 220 rounds in the F-35B and F-35C.
    * Up to four AIM-120 AMRAAM, AIM-9X Sidewinder or AIM-132 ASRAAM internally, or two air-to-air and two air-to-ground weapons (up to two 2,000 lb weapons in A and C; two 1000 lb weapons in B) in the bomb bays. These could be AMRAAM, the Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) up to 2,000 lb (910 kg), the Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW), Small Diameter Bombs (SDB) — a maximum of four in each bay, the Brimstone anti-armour missiles, Cluster Munitions (WCMD) and High Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARM). The MBDA Meteor air-to-air missile is currently being adapted to fit internally in the missile spots and may be integrated into the F-35.
    * Many more missiles, bombs and fuel tanks can be attached to the four wing pylons and two wingtip positions, but at the expense of being more detectable by radar. The two wingtip pylons can only carry short-range air-to-air missiles (AIM-9s), while the Storm Shadow and Joint Air to Surface Stand-off Missile (JASSM) cruise missiles can be carried in addition to the stores already integrated. An air-to-air load of 12 AIM-120s and two AIM-9s is conceivable using internal and external weapons stations, as well as a configuration of six two thousand pound bombs, two AIM-120s and two AIM-9s.

    http://www.domain-b.com/aero/july/2007/20070724_F-35.htm

    in reply to: SU-30's to fly at Waddington airshow #2537901
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    nice pics… no, make that friggin’ awesome!!

    in reply to: First, It Was Arnold. Now, It's Bruce's Turn!? #2523598
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    before TOP GUN Val Kilmer starred in a movie concerning “Top Secret”-ish?? movie and a B-1A made a few cameo appearances throughout the movie. gees, can’t remember all the movie’s titles.

    oh, yeah. FOXFIRE with the ultra jet (Clint Eastwood). they even had the arcade game with the same title (now looking back it’s the movie that seems more like an arcade game to me!!).

    in reply to: First, It Was Arnold. Now, It's Bruce's Turn!? #2524006
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    there were a few foreign films also with MiG-29 (West Germany), MiG-15 or -17, and from US an SR-71 from the 90s.

    in reply to: F-22A Pics, News & Speculations Thread #2524169
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    back to the pic, just wondering whether the pic has been tampered with?

    in reply to: F-22A Pics, News & Speculations Thread #2524198
    fulcrum-aholic
    Participant

    Ok, now that did wonders to my rotten mood today! 😀

    …your welcome.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 340 total)