I’ve just posted a new pool on my blog : what weapons shoul be integrated on the Rafale.
http://rafalenews.blogspot.com/
I’m interested in your opinion on the subject 🙂
1. The UAE will not likely get the F-35 for many years you can thank the IAF for that.
2. when they do get them don’t expect a radar upgrade that better than the IAF version.
3. I know you’ll point to the F-16 block 60. But I think the F-35 is more of a game changer than a block 60.
4. The radar area on the F-35 is sealed, and the F-35s radar will already be a step up from the block 60. I just cannot see what the next step is right now.
if you say so…
The UAE will probably ask for a better version of the APG-81 when they will order their F-35 in a few years to replace the F-16bk60.
So what’s your point ?
Think about it :
The mirage 2000-5 radar was not good enough for the UAE so they asked for the developement of the RDY-2 radar.
The F-16bk52 radar was not good enough for the UAE so they asked for the developement of the APG-80 radar.
Now the rafale radar is not good enough for them so they asked for a boosted RBE-2AA version.
What a surprise.
BTW, this article has been discussed to death in the rafale news thread.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=96119&page=33
THANK YOU, OPIT.
I don’t mean to shout, but that was excellent!
I have another one 😀
The reason I got the impression that the AN/APG-80 has longer range:
To me “regression” in this context suggest lower performance — and there is a direct reference to the radar range of the F-16 block 60.
So my interpretation is that unless the RBE2 AESA range increases, it will have a lower range than the F-16 radar.
Or did something get lost in translation?
The UAE don’t have AWACS. That the reason why they ask for the maximum radar range possible.
Well yes, it’s a prototype. The final product should be ready next year.
Perhaps Selex/Saab use a different terminology than Thales?
Seems strange that Thales is producing AESA radars in August this year that will be installed next year….Not exactly Just In Time production…
Perhaps that’s why some people call those early units “pre-production”?
To be clear :
Thales deliver the first production RBE-2 AA this month to Dassault.
Dassault has 5-6 months to integrate and test these 4 radar on 4 rafale currently on its production line.
When fully tested and validated by Dassault (including inflight tests like every rafale coming out of the production line) those 4 AESA rafale will be delivered to the french air force CEAM in early 2011
At the CEAM center, the french air force will take about a year to test the radar, as well as writing and validating the millitary procedures to use it. This is a big task because this radar comes with new weapons and features (meteor just to name it) which means that new tactics have to be developped.
Meanwile (in 2011), the air force and the navy will continue to receive their AESA rafale but they will be declared operational only in 2012 when the CEAM will have finished its job and enough pilots will have been trained to use it in combat.
All the model listed by PhantomII are french versions
Mirage 2000N is also cleared for GBU-12/24.
Although it needs an external laser designation


We don’t read the same source JJ
The risk weight were doubled by Brazilian Air Force High Command to gave the F/A-18E/F a lead. From 5% to 10%.
no, that was the one SH won, by air having an increase from 5% to 10% performance requirement in the eval, it took a 40% TOT to knock it out
dont embarrass yourself by having a SH vs Rafale capability debate
no the SH won on the price of the plane and the costs of ownership due to cheap US spare parts and weapons. Which can be explained by the rather big production for the US navy, weak dollar and the poor ToT package (a package that does not come for free in the rafale offer).
Do you have a source about that ? And I thought that the gripen NG could carry 2 drop tank on the two fuselage hard points.
Without a center line hard point it will be difficult to cope for a full mission with an assymetric load of Taurus or GBU24. This makes bogus the argument that a bigger number of smaller aircrafts with lighter loads would make the job as well or better than bigger aircrafts.
what is the purpose of the targeting pod on the 3 gripen ?
medium load?
How often does Rafale o F18 in real life load more than 7200kg under its wings and body?
Well this is the casual (and operational) deep strike config for the rafale 😉

tanks : 3*1840kg (1600kg of fuel + 240kg of tank) = 5520kg
scalp : 2*1300kg = 2600 kg
mica : 4*112 = 448kg
total : 8568 kg
In BVR, a Mig-25 flying high and fast is not an easy target to reach.
however, i would give the advantage of radar/missile/RCS to the mirage.
Some calculation should be done, but I expect that a RDI + super 530D looking up on a mig-25 could engage the mig at longer ranger than RP-25 + R-40.
I do not remember the mig-25 radar to be famous for it’s look down capability.
On the other hand the super 530D is a super fast missile designed to climb very high. (It’s purpose was precisely to intercept migs flying at high altitude)
For evasive manoeuvers, the more agile and smaller mirage also has more chance to evade the R-40 than the mig to evide the S530D
That being said, the mirage 2000C and the super 530D are much more recent than the Mig-25 + R-40.
The mig is probably more suitable to engage bombers rather than small interceptors
i’ve used TMor as a source (its only passive and AC that gets his eyes to glaze over :eek:)
why wouldnt i use someone from AD ?
the sensible thing could be to ask usa for their f414 / ~9.8 ton to use for uae, rafale used the f404 / ~7.9 ton before, so it fits
Well, only the rafale A (which is a bit larger) was used with the F404