dark light

Kovy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,135 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2383451
    Kovy
    Participant

    A decision in Brazil, where the NG is again up against the Super Hornet and Typhoon is now “with the politicians”, Rosen says.

    :rolleyes:

    Contrary to Pepe’s conclusion, adding equal RCS (as in similar bomb load) to those fighters will make the difference between the two less.

    Well, spectra is said to be able to treat peak radar signal generated by specefic weapons loads… like the scalp-EG for instance. this could explain a bigger gap than between a clean rafale and a clean F/A-18E. What do you think ?

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2385727
    Kovy
    Participant

    @Kovy
    do you want me to give a source that there is a link to mica [one way, not 2 way] i can do that
    what i cant do is give a source that isar & ea is even on the 2020 map

    I don’t care about your links as I have plenty links myself.
    Still, the feature is not in the Thales datasheet…

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2386709
    Kovy
    Participant

    I didn’t send anything. :rolleyes:

    lol. asperger syndrome ?

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2386719
    Kovy
    Participant

    this started when arthuro was negative to the gripen radar and i said ‘aesa’ had isar and ea, unlike rafale
    it has gone from there and yes there are plans for the phoon to have isar,
    but why put up a link, you dont even believe thales and dassault and say that even though its not stated, it doesnt mean it doesnt have it
    someone told me aussie f-35 are going to have 2 engines, just because its not stated by LM, doesnt mean it wont

    Stop your bogus logic.

    The fact that ISAR is not mentioned in Thales data sheet means nothing.

    The RBE-2AA may have it
    OR may not
    OR may have it in the future

    You just don’t know and can’t conclude anything from the absence of the feature in a public data sheet.

    just one 1 exemple :

    The data sheet doesn’t say that the RBE-2 has a data link mode to communicate with the mica missiles in flight…. although it is a known fact.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2389190
    Kovy
    Participant

    BUT: what if the Rafale in some other international bid was winning on all accounts only to be swept aside by the whims of a single person, government organization or political group? Would you not be very upset?

    This is exactly what happend to the rafale in Korea and Singapore.

    There are 2 big differences though.

    France can’t pressure Brazil as the US did on Korea and singapore…. so France is waiting for Brazil decision.
    Brazil made it clear since the begining that the final choice will be political. And if i remember correctly, the political preference of the brazilian government was clearly stated as being the rafale 10 months ago.

    It’s not Jobim fault if Saab is still hoping for a miracle.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2389270
    Kovy
    Participant

    the difference is good weather, daylight 40k vs 100+k all weather, day/night
    why dont you read up on the use of isar

    That’s why I’ve said “big part of the job” and not “100% of the job”

    OSF-IT is day/night/bad weather (note I didn’t say all weather)
    Are you sure about the 100+k against a fighter size target ?

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2389312
    Kovy
    Participant

    Interesting question.

    Obviously, Thales can do it, but maybe it was not considered a high priority for RBE2, & will be added later. Or maybe, as you speculate, RBE2 has it, & it’s just missing from the datasheet.

    Well the datasheet says SAR modes

    My humble opinion is that features will be implemented on the RBE-2AA step by step as it was the case with the pesa RBE-2.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2389363
    Kovy
    Participant

    kovy used the term fighter and in a fighter role isar would mainly be used for target ID so i read, in its omni/strike role isar is more valuable, hence why i questioned it

    It would be strange for you not to say ISAR would increase the rafale’s maritime surface target capability, also land and air capability when it is of value.

    The TV channel of the the OSF make a big part of this job (with the advantage of being silent)

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2389425
    Kovy
    Participant

    also have you looked at the gripen aesa specs that you think is substandard to the rafale aesa
    i think you will be in for a shock

    Please, stop your little troll game.

    Nobody here is saying that the gripen aesa is substandard.
    What has been said is that its development is at an earlier stage than the rafale aesa which first production units will be delivered next month by Thales.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2389698
    Kovy
    Participant

    So you don’t want to explain us the importance of an ISAR for a fighter ?

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2389746
    Kovy
    Participant

    do you want me to explain the significance of not having ISAR to you ?

    Go on

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2390346
    Kovy
    Participant

    15 a year LOL, how many years have they made 15 ?

    the prodction is between 10 and 15 a year.
    But you are right, For the next years it should be closer to 10 than 15

    and i saw it as not dependent on export but hoping the export would keep it being built
    it was also posted a while ago they had 20 for 2011-2014, thats 5 a year

    AFAIK, those rumors has been denied.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2390386
    Kovy
    Participant

    kovy
    ok plugging wires together is thales, making it is swiss

    Yes, Ruag is supplying the wiring. what is your problem with that ?

    so whats the story with no more rafale for france for years

    If Dassault get export orders (Brazil, UAE), the french air force may have to wait 2 years to get new rafale because the planes geting out of the production line will go to the export customers first.

    So :

    if no export orders : the french air force will continue to get about 15 rafale per year but upgrades might be slower
    if export orders : the french air force will get no rafale for 2 years but upgrades will be faster.

    But nothing has been decided yet.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2390405
    Kovy
    Participant

    i’m still waiting for you to acknowledge that the swiss are doing the integration of the antenna to the backend

    Ruag is supplying the wired back structures of the antenna.
    The integration is made by Thales/Dassault.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2390727
    Kovy
    Participant

    There is one thing that seems puzzling to me; if the arguments for the Rafale are so overwhelming why all the delays in proclaming the winner of this competition? I think the most likely answer is that the arguments for Rafale are not that overwhelming after all… and Jobim needed all this extra time to “develop” the arguments to defend the choice…

    Or more simply, the rafale price is quite high and Boeing/Saab are lobbying as hard as they can… therefore the brasilian government is pressuring the french to get as much as they can from this deal.

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,135 total)