No, Key don’t meet the expense of this forum out of the goodness of their heart. This is not altruism. They clearly pretend to run a business and their fora are supposed to be part of it.
Were this forum to close those of a like mind and interest would likely find another, or another forum would find them. Were that forum not intimately attached to a ‘business’ interest it would very likely be a rather braver, honest and more reliable place to exchange.
I find this episode shocking. The utter lack of transparency is disrespectful to us all, especially to the Moderators who freely give up their time and cares. Bad business. Bad for business. Amateur in the extreme.
d.
This is all a very sad turn of events
However – At the end of the day this is Key’s site and Key’s forum. We post on the site at Key’s invitation. The fact remains that they don’t have to run the forum at all. They may decide that the hassle it causes is too much and just pull the plug on it.
In which case no-one will benefit
Image duly Googled, thank you. Now that would have been a tail-chase to behold. She appears to have subsequently acquired another three blades (et al). Gloriously greedy. 🙂 Your avatar?
The ‘Flight’ photographer also captured surviving Spitfire PS890 on the same shoot…same scenery and same leaning focal plane architecture. 🙂
Mark
81 Sqn Mosquito PR34A – Seletar 1953
Perhaps no more than 15 feet…
RG177 piloted by Flt Sgt Anderson, with the Nav, Martin French looking almost straight at the photographer (unknown). Seletar, May 1953.
The image has been published before, both in Bowyer (1973) and Bowman but reproduced therein as smallish, half-tones, but no apologies for giving it another airing here. This is a scan of a rather battered print taken at one time from the original. The latter once resided in the archives of The Aeroplane magazine but now reported by their archivist to be missing.
Can’t help with the others but the sixth one down’s definitely Douglas Bader’s signature.
[QUOTE=Bob;1280368]Got one from bequiet – uncenzored youtube (sic) or some such. Thanks for the warning…
I had the same message from the same sender and deleted it.
d.
Thanks for posting that, sad to learn of her passing, but a life lived.
ATA members were certainly an extraordinary group of people, all individuals barred from combat service due to contemporary attitudes towards age, ‘disability’ and gender. Whilst class analysis is always interesting and pertinent it’s no more so than race and gender; at the time it wasn’t enough simply to be wealthy if one wished to live a full life, ‘tho, as ever, it helped. It’s often forgotten how many appalling values had an ordinary, common currency in the UK of the 30s & 40s: snobbery, sexism, racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia. Aside from a desire to make a contribution, many in the ATA may have felt that they had something more personal to prove which found expression through their service.
Certainly the women had to fight very hard against ingrained prejudices at all levels in order to be permitted to do the job they did so well. They accomplished this at some cost in lives lost and I imagine, for many, in their lives postwar. Attached are images from the contemporary logs of one such woman, Veronica Volkersz; wealthy, but a person who found expression through her ATA service that would very likely have eluded her simply because of gender. The entries for Aircraft Flown at the end of her Form 414 for 1945-46 vividly illustrate the wide range of types routinely flown by all ATA pilots.
– and on September 15th 1945, Ms. Volkersz very quietly made history as the first woman anywhere in the world to fly an *operational* jet fighter, a thirty-minute flight in a Meteor III from the Gloster factory to RAF Molesworth, a small event touched on nicely in Giles Whittell’s recent book.
Clear skies.