BTW there are a couple of pictures of the restoration of ML814 in “The Last Flying Boat” that confirm that the control surfaces were fabric covered..
Ok
Assume she is there..
How easy/hard would this be able to raise. The Wellington needed an external raising frame because of her construction. However, she is a metal framed hull and basically ‘sound’
Is it really that expensive??
The Norwegians have had mucho success raising big aircraft (except the Condor) 🙁 with normal inflation bags.. Of course we could get 10,000,000 ping pong balls
re:
I would love to know which characters are behind this… Anyone know anything?
I don;’t know but I would definately start any investigation here:
Also does any body else thinks that the image indicates that she has ‘moved’ i.e. there is a brief outline of her in the ‘silt’. I do not think this is due to acoustic shadows ‘north to south’ in the image on here and east to west on the image at
I would agrue yes Hendon and Duxford already have one.. But no one would have thought Brooklands would get a (and restore a Wimpy) 25 years ago.. They are now doing a Hurricane now.. So yes some small (non public funded) musuems could do it..
re:
The front turret is probably not ‘missing’ it slid aft on a mounting to allow for access to the mooring bollards
Good Point James. I had forgotten about that ‘would makes it even a better fake’ as if the turret was there people would say ‘eh’ should it have been wound back if scuttled at morring point..
Oh. and the only reference to fabric covered control surfaces.. I can accept this on a Mark 1, but was this the case on all subsequent versions? – I can’t google it so it is down to the reference books
Alternatively can someone go to duxford and (tap gently!) on the control fabrics on the one there?
All very interesting
Just a couple of comments 2 pennth
a) If it is a fake (and I say a very big IF) it is a very good one.. You have to admire someone who not only fakes it but removes the engines and front turret to make it look just enough of an ‘authentic scuttled’ aircraft well to fool us anaroks anyway!
b) I love the collasped and detachde ‘out-rigger floats’ on each side
c) IIRC The Loch Ness Wellington had fabric still attached when originally found.. (It lost some to grappled nets before it was recovered)
Paul
Online link to article – Minus sonar scan
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,173-1049851,00.html
Online link to article – Minus sonar scan
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,173-1049851,00.html
No comment from me about
Entire current RNZAF Fighter ability being maintained at this base!
Thanks Ewan N/T
Thanks Ewan N/T
As fighters go with bits of over 21 Survivors left (out of total production which was not much!) I would reckon the Commonwealth Boomerang has a good chance.
KB943 was disposed of as late as June 1965 at Dunville so I assume the story could be true
1/10 for effort so far
The only Spitfire without an RAF Serial was F.01 which was the 1st French Spitfire (of an inquiry for 3),
delivered in July 1939. The other 2 were never supplied. This was the 251st production aircraft and flew
with the GB B-Class Registration as N-21. It was burnt in June 1940 and the remains were captured by the Germans
Paul McMillan
“
Whatever, I am not wiping Keira Knightly for anyone!”
Wiping What????
Elliot
Check your yahoo account!
Paul