Excellent photos!
Probably contains a radar scanner and swings down 180 degrees once airborne for surface vessel search: ASV radar, in other words.
Great pics, Ken, I especially like the last one. Did you have to use full zoom all the time? Looks like the “crowd line” was quite far from the “display line”.
A gust of solar wind!
From http://www.auckland-airport.co.nz/NewsHistory/aviators.php?gull
The first Percival Gull, built in 1932, was considered highly advanced when it first appeared. Its sleek looks contrasted with the biplanes typical of the period. Jean Batten’s three seater version, of which there were only 19, was built in 1935 and is now hanging behind you. It cost her 1750 pounds sterling, “every penny I owned”.
The monoplane was constructed of wood and fabric and has a wingspan of 11.02 metres and a length of 7.6 metres. It made many record breaking flights until war broke out in 1939 when it was requisitioned by the Royal Air Force as a communication aircraft bearing the designation AX866.
Percival Aircraft, designers and manufacturers of the Gull, (later to become the Hunting Group) bought the plane in 1946 at the end of the war. The Company used it only intermittently, so in April 1961 the Group presented it to the Shuttleworth Trust to join their collection of historical aircraft.
The Gull was flown occasionally on public display days until it required major restoration. This was sponsored by the Hunting Group in association with the Shuttleworth Trust and began in 1987. It was a massive task to make this historic aircraft completely airworthy again.
Auckland International Airport Limited borrowed the plane to be displayed in The International Terminal during 1990 for New Zealand’s 150th anniversary celebrations which coincided with the 25th anniversary of the opening of Auckland International Airport.
After its return to England, the Airport Company negotiated to purchase the Percival Gull G-ADPR. The last time it flew was over Auckland in 1996 to mark the sixtieth anniversary of Jean Batten’s record breaking flight between England and Auckland.
James D, I think this extract from an earlier post by “Lowtimer” applies regarding the CAA’s position vis-a-vis “old” and “new” airframes:
“I was making those comments in the context of a new-build Typhoon replica with a new-build Sabre replica engine. I agree that if you owned an aeroplane and engine with historical provenance you would be in with a shout. Although not capable of getting a C of A, a rebuilt Typhoon would in principle be eligible for a CAA Permit to Fly in the ex-military category. But completely new one would not, because of not being an ex-military aeroplane. Nor would it be eligible for a PFA Permit to Fly because of being way outside the PFA criteria.
This may seem peculiar but it is analagous to the situation with Yaks,for example. I am allowed to fly a fairly elderly Yak-52 on a CAA Permit because it is an ex military aeroplane. I am not allowed to run a newly manufactured Aerostar Yak-52TW on a CAA permit because it has no military service. However, if I have my old 52 subjected to a major mod by Yak UK / Termikas to convert it to a similar tailwheel configuration, I can have it on a CAA Permit because it’s still regarded as an ex military aeroplane. May not make a lot of sense, but that’s the way they run things.”
Present Swedish complement:
7 Squadrons of Gripens
1 Squadron of reconnaissance Viggens
6 Air transport Squadrons
(But I have no idea how many aircraft are in a Squadron!
Anyway, it looks as if the UK has some way to go before its aircraft numbers decrease to less than Sweden’s.
I was actually hoping for a post or two from a pukka defence analyst!
There’s no wind or turbulence in outer space!
Selling a free manual is one way to make a fast buck!
John Tranum (of Danish origin) was famous for his parachuting exploits in the 1930s and certainly visited the UK; he learned to jump in the USA and for example once rode a motorcycle off a 1000 ft cliff, parachuting to safety.
Shamrock, I have no particular axe to grind, but my post #2 shows how they fiddle the punctuality figures. I am happy to arrive home “early” after a Ryanair flight, but it’s only because the leg has been allowed excessive time in the first place. I might add that I travel with them frequently (no other choice!) so it’s not an occasional occurrence!
Size of the RAF
As a matter of interest, has anyone done the numbers to show where the RAF ranks a) today and b) after the cuts, in comparison with other Air Forces? In aircraft numbers, I mean. Of course it might be a case of comparing apples with pears, but the thought just struck me that perhaps, for example, the Swedish Air Force will be bigger than the RAF soon, even though it has (as far as I know) no overseas commitments at all.
Just a thought, maybe I am way off course (ute och cyklar, as we say in Swedish), but interesting, don’t you think?
I heard it on the radio while stuck out in the middle of Bahrain desert on guard duty. Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds was also on the radio in the 1930s and a lot of people panicked!
Mind you, I believe they did land on the moon myself, others may have a different opinion.
Fox News this morning swallowed it hook, line and sinker, but that’s a cr@p news channel anyway, unfortunately it’s the only English language one I have here!
The doubts I expressed in my earlier post #5 have subsided somewhat, I now agree that there is too much embroidery in the article, which may contain a small grain of truth but not much more.
We’re all waiting for the other shoe to drop . . .