Yes, that sounds like bakelite!
More detail from Bill Gunston’s book:
“Furniture-maker Henk Pander took over a defunct factory in August 1924. Formed Nederlandse Fabriek van Vliegtuigen H. Pander & Zonen . . .”
The MacRobertson Race contender that crashed in 1934 was the Postjäger long range racer monoplane (3 x 420 hp engines).
Turn to Bill Gunston’s “World Encyclopaedia of Aircraft Manufacturers” page 230 for a brief history of furniture-maker Henk Pander’s company in the Netherlands, founded in 1924. Went into receivership about 1934 and built very few aircraft.
Regarding the hanging banners at East Fortune – I hope the idea doesn’t catch on in any other aviation museums – I think they are a darned nuisance and detract rather than add anything to the displays. Let’s keep to discreet pedestal-mounted aircraft details, I say!
“Only two Hydras were ever built and one of these was test flown in the Hawker Harrier, which Bristol used for a variety of test engines. It apparently suffered from severe vibration at critical speeds”
Extract from http://www.enginehistory.org/bristol_hydra.htm
Great link! Many hours of pleasurable reading ahead!
A radial with an even number of cylinders does not deliver power evenly, whilst with an odd number of cylinders the firing sequence can be arranged so that steady power is obtained. Reference “The Development of Piston Aero Engines” by our old friend Bill Gunston, pages 115 and 116 (which has an explanatory diagram).
Someone’s been playing silly bu@@ers!
Someone’s been playing silly bu@@ers!
TE462 wing tip
Here is a portion of my photo of TE462, resident at East Fortune. You can see the rest of the picture at the Museum Explorer web site.
My gripe is that things that do not affect the plot and main theme of the film are often changed, seemingly arbitrarily. I agree with you, Dave, that there seems often to be a lack of research which results in small nut niggling inaccuracies.
On a slightly different tack, I recently bought “The Aviator” DVD and have consigned it into the “twaddle” pile along with the “Pearl Harbour” remake. In fact I fell asleep halfway through!
Lunar module replica
Just to give an idea of the scale, here is a photo I took of the replica Lunar Module at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, Washington, in 2003.
This is a fascinating thread, but I don’t want to be the subject of anyone’s ire. I just think personally that there appears to be plenty of room inside the module for both astronauts, since they were standing all the time, I believe.
Lunar module replica
Just to give an idea of the scale, here is a photo I took of the replica Lunar Module at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, Washington, in 2003.
This is a fascinating thread, but I don’t want to be the subject of anyone’s ire. I just think personally that there appears to be plenty of room inside the module for both astronauts, since they were standing all the time, I believe.
I have always wondered whether it is the writer, producer, director or all three who tend to distort the facts in such films, where (although perhaps not a true documentary), such distortion infuriates the knowledgable and does not really seem necessary, even to entertain the general public.
While realising that films are made to make money, there seem to me at least to be many occasions when true facts are brushed aside when there is no need, and they do not affect in the least the dramatic effects obtained.
I think I’ll stick to watching proper documentaries – although they also have shortcomings!
Canadian Hawk
Like this one, taken at Moose Jaw?
Hurricane P2617
At Abingdon in 1968 for the RAF 50th birthday celebrations – I was there!