It seems Pakistan’s F-16 are used now and then for bombing missions … wonder how much life is remained after such regular use, any information on it, is highly appreciated.
Not really regular. There have been lulls in the bombing as the present government try to negotiate, the fact the current campaign makes headline news is testemount to that face.
Also, PAF uses most of its platforms for bombing missions, bar perhaps the F-7s. According to many AFM articles, Upgraded ROSE Mirages and JF-17s have all pulled duty on the bomb missions. This is also to spread experiance amongst PAF aircrew. F-16s are very accurate but by no means the only options.
In terms of airframe wear and tear, I imagine the occasional bomb missions pulled by the various F-16 sqds may not be more detrimental then say their regular participation in air combat exercises at home and abroad.
I think the PAF should have a total of about 76 F-16s, all equivalent to the Block-50/52 standard, assuming these 13 ex-RJAF examples are inducted and after the TAI upgrades of the original Block-15 OCU airframes. Any details on why the RJAF decided to sell their MLU Vipers? I think these were originally ex Belgian or Dutch F-16s that went through Block-15 MLU?
I was just counting A/B numbers, not the C/Ds. Article states they were ADF versions, so part of RJAFs orginal batch supplied in the 90s.
PAF aqquires 13 F-16 MLUs from Jordan, activating a third MLU sqd next month.
PAF acquires F-16s from Jordan
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-28662-PAF-acquires-F-16s-from-Jordan
Interesting bits and bobs here!
1) This means PAF can now raise another F-16MLU squadron as it will now have 58 F-16s, previously it had 45 divided between 2 sqds. This will give it a total of 4 F-16 sqds if you include the Block 52 sqd. Suspect it may get a non-upgraded Mirage sqd that gets replaced.
2) The birds are MLU’d, but pretty sure it is not the same standard as the MLU PAF F-16s are going through in Turkey (Tape 6?)
3) Not the first time the US had authorised Jordan to transfer US fighters to Pakistan (done in the 70s with F-104s)
The every same Mirages and subs France supplied to Pakistan straight afterwards?
As is stated, no “lethal” equipment was supplied, even the sources you posted do not state this, so it is difficult to see the point you are making.
This may shock you, but in the real world, France (and the vast majority or arms companies) stand with where the money is.
Please do not fool yourself that anyone has an emotional comitment to any one country.
Didn’t say they messed up, but if India doesn’t have the money maybe Dassault should withdraw from the negotiations. Everyone says India doesn’t have the money including all the politicians and the negotiators from the Indian side. There is no point in continuing if India does not have the money does it?
Yes, you are right, lets see what happens in the very near future. Will be fun.
Guess that means Dassault are taking their toys and going home then? Wait… no, that’s not what’s happening in real life is it? 😀
Wow! So in your head, you are spinning this as Dassault messing up and India sitting on a pile of cash waiting to buy? Despite statements claiming no cash from
1) Prime Minister of India
2) Defence Minister of India
3) Every major newspaper of India
Good luck with that….
Then please give a credible source …
“March 21/13: Support. Looks like Saudi Arabia just ordered a support contract. Saab announces a 5-year, SEK 1.1 billion ($170 million) contract that runs from 2013-2017, and covers “a comprehensive set of spares and support services for a previously delivered system, Saab 2000 AEW&C (Airborne Early Warning & Control).” Unfortunately, “The industry’s nature is such that depending on circumstances concerning the product and customer, information regarding the customer will not be announced.”
Logic makes it obvious, though. Air forces using Saab turboprop AWACS include Sweden, Thailand and the UAE (Saab 340), and Pakistan and Saudi Arabia (Saab 2000). Pakistan’s sale is well known and hasn’t been secret, so a Saab 2000 AEW&C customer insisting on secrecy means… Saudi Arabia.
It’s OK, we won’t tell anyone”
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/saabs-mysterious-s-2000-aewc-customer-06586/
On the contrary, most commentators foresee strong economic growth over the long term. The current paralysis in particular will end only once the new government is voted in.
Also, they haven’t overspent – with about a month left in the financial year, the MoD has spent 92% of its capital budget.
All deals signed so far – C-130J, C-17, P-8I, Hawk, Mi-17 as well as MiG and Mirage upgrades are completely funded. As for the MMRCA, while it ought to be scrapped, its not over yet.
Bit surprised by the sweeping generalisations regarding economic growth. “Most commentators”!? Really. The FT, The Economist and the OECD all state the obvious, but we are moving off topic.
The other deals were indeed funded, but the point the PM of India is making,is that India cannot sustain that level of defence spending at current growth rates.
Posting some PR spin from Dassault tragically will not equip IAF pilots with decent aircraft, will it? When even the PM of India is pointing out that things may be cut, it may not be best qouting “anonymous sources” or the head sales guy/CEO at the vendor. Just my thoughts…
Trimming the defence budget isn’t the same as there being ‘no money’. Even after reduction, the capital acquisitions budget for the (now ending) financial year stood at about $17 billion. Extrapolating from that, the Indian MoD will be disbursing funds totalling well over $100 billion upto 2020. Making a partial payment for the Rafale and/or PAK FA won’t exactly bankrupt the state.
The focus for the GoI right now is controlling the immediate fiscal deficit, which means delaying the Rafale deal if necessary. Ideally, the experience should wean the Indian military off ‘premium’ purchases and instil a greater focus on obtaining value-for-money. Whether that will happen remains to be seen.
Yes and no, obviously they have overspent this year, but there seems to be a concern about a long term economic slowdown as per the posted report
“Terming the economic slowdown a “looming and serious challenge”, he said, “We need to match our investment in military equipment and forces to our national resources.”
What I do not understand is that for years, whilst all these “deals” were being negotiated and vendors were led up the garden path, not a single person realised the issue of funds. I would think even Dassault would have done some due diligence on how they would be paid or where the money was coming from.
1 Rafale = 2MKI or 4 Tejas. Squadron strength will actually be better if the Rafale is not purchased.
You still need money, no matter what plane you decide to buy, and there seems to be none in the pot…
PM hints at trimming defence budget, says need to ‘cut our coat according to our cloth’
Well and Erieye sale was definately made, the Swedes announced it.
Sounds reasonable enough to me
It does not mention Dassault support anywhere during Kargil. Just Israeli and Russian supplied bombs. It just stats that the IAF used the Mirage during ops.
No other questions.