dark light

1batfastard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,661 through 3,675 (of 4,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: JUST A NICE PIC – Mirage III #2259390
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    This site disagreeshttp://www.aircraftinformation.info/art_mir3v.htm
    Here’s another anyway
    http://www.cavok-aviation-photos.net/nrm03/Mirage3RS_R2110.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Sad news , the end of an era , Paul Poberezny passes #971722
    1batfastard
    Participant

    The universe is one star less. R.I.P.

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #971762
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Bombgone,
    Here’s another view from the car cam

    and then it did a bungee jump

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #971861
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Duxman and DCW,
    Lovely pictures as always :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: JUST A NICE PIC – Mirage III #2259410
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    O.K. then I’ll bite :rolleyes:
    http://www.aircraftinformation.info/Images/mir3v_02.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: The Iranian Saeqeh: What is the verdict? #2259425
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    From this video looks like their big fans of the Blue Angels :highly_amused:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #272353
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Never new him or contacted through this forum, but send his Family my condolences please .

    Geoff.

    in reply to: Mick Freer #1872774
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Never new him or contacted through this forum, but send his Family my condolences please .

    Geoff.

    in reply to: B25 to appear at East Kirkby #973484
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    What a tribute it will be to Fred this display will be good luck to all involved. :eagerness:

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #973488
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    From a car jumping a plane to a car jumping from a plane :highly_amused: Enjoy. http://http://www.businessinsider.com/its-not-fake-chevy-really-did-drop-this-car-out-of-a-plane–just-for-fun-2012-3?op=1http://static3.businessinsider.com/image/4f50f6be6bb3f7b75200000d-1200/the-crew-filmed-from-underneath-the-falling-car.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Nuclear powered aeroplanes? #973500
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    baloffski you are quite right I saw the same programme :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    All I can add to my previous post on this subject is that the U.S. never had a jet engine till Britain gave them one (Correct me if I am wrong), as for reading the 2009 post I was just commenting on a subject post like all other forumites, I am the first to hold my hands up and say I only know a little which is why I find this forum very imformative and love learning more on a subject I have enjoyed over my life time. Or am I wrong about this and the Forum ? and it is only for those with an higher intellect with actual aeronautical knowledge that comes from first hand experience of Flying or Working in the Industry.

    The amount of snobbery that exists in life amazes me and to have it here on a subject I have enthused about since childhood is beyond belief, for cry’n out loud were meant to be adults, all forumites have the right to post opinions and some obviously know more about the subject than others, but I joined this forum not only to learn more but to be involved with like minded people but the more I read it seems that some behave like spoilt kids and only their view is the correct one. 😡 Sorry to all for the rant back on subject.

    I found these following statements on wiki :- All flying tailplanes were used from early times and the private venture monoplane de Havilland DH.77 (first flying in 1929) offering for a high performance Royal Air Force interceptor used an all flying tail.

    Stabilators were developed to achieve adequate pitch control in supersonic flight, and are almost universal on modern military combat aircraft. All[citation needed] non-delta-winged supersonic aircraft use stabilators because with conventional control surfaces, shock waves can form past the elevator hinge, causing severe mach tuck.

    The British wartime Miles M.52 supersonic project was designed with stabilators. Though the design only flew as a scale rocket, its all-flying tail was tested on both a Spitfire and the Miles “Gillette” Falcon.[5] The contemporary American supersonic project, the Bell X-1, adapted its variable incidence tailplane into an all-moving tailplane (based on the Miles M.52 project data) and was operated successfully in 1947.[6] The North American F-86 Sabre, the first U.S. Air Force aircraft which could go supersonic (although in a shallow dive) was introduced with a conventional horizontal stabilizer with elevators, which was eventually replaced with a stabilator.

    When stabilators can move differentially to perform the roll control function of ailerons, as they do on many modern fighter aircraft they are known as tailerons or rolling tails. A canard surface, looking like a stabilator but not stabilizing like a tailplane, [7] can also be mounted in front of the main wing in a canard configuration (Curtiss-Wright XP-55 Ascender).

    Stabilators on military aircraft have the same problem of too light control forces (inducing overcontrol) as general aviation aircraft. In older jet fighter aircraft, a resisting force was generated within the control system, either by springs or a resisting hydraulic force, rather than by an external anti-servo tab. For example in the North American F-100 Super Sabre, springs were attached to the control stick to provide increasing resistance to pilot input. In modern fighters, control inputs are moderated by computers (“fly by wire”), and there is no direct connection between the pilot’s stick and the stabilator.
    Also
    Stabilators or all-moving tails

    In transonic flight shock waves generated by the tailplane render the elevator unusable. An all-moving tail was developed by the British for the Miles M.52, but first saw actual transonic flight on the Bell X-1; fortunately Bell Aircraft Corporation had included an elevator trim device that could alter the angle of attack of the entire tailplane. This saved the program from a costly and time-consuming rebuild of the aircraft.

    Transonic and supersonic aircraft now have all-moving tailplanes to counteract Mach tuck and maintain maneuverability when flying faster than the critical Mach number. Normally called a stabilator, this configuration is often referred to as an “all-moving” or “all-flying” tailplane.

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2260751
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    A little bigger suggest you check out other my other posts, not just me using small pic’s and not always small pic’s posted by me :confused: anyway get some glasses if you can’t see the small pic’s :highly_amused:
    http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/EAP_foto-BAe.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Would F-35 make sense for India in 2020-2030 period? #2260762
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Not really because at the moment with our foreign aid package we would be buying them :highly_amused:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Lets help Iran design a stealth fighter/bomber :D #2260771
    1batfastard
    Participant

    why would the Russians want to help them? I know the west thinks Russia and Iran are buddy buddy, but the truth of the matter is.. the Iranians hate the Russians. They only tolerate them because they hate the Americans more. the Russians wont bother with Iran either unless they can get away with charging them 300% above value price. see Iran-Russian nuclear cooperation or lack of.

    Hi All,
    You are quite correct I hold my hands up :stupid:, Having now read different views on the various relationships with different countries. I would say that although China has been coming under some pressure about trading with Iran this country I feel would be more than willing to help, the only problem I would see is that because China are also on the increase with various ventures with Iraq there could be a clash of interests.

    Geoff.:D

Viewing 15 posts - 3,661 through 3,675 (of 4,006 total)