dark light

1batfastard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,721 through 3,735 (of 4,006 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #272636
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    The excuse used was WMD initially and that we would help them achieve democracy and judging by the on going fighting between the different sects in both country’s we have not achieved this. In all the wars the British have fought in Iraq on the following occasions with varied success and reasons for doing so.
    Mesopotamian campaign (1914–1918)
    Anglo-Iraqi War (1941)
    Gulf War (1990-1991)
    Iraqi no-fly zones conflict (1991–2003)
    Iraq War (2003–2011)
    The same can be said of Afghanistan for the same above so we have had a varied series of campaigns and history of resentment that has built up in both country’s for generations,what surprised me were the amount of other country’s who have also fought in both country’s so it seems that for what ever reason Afghanistan is prime territory from the first to the present and will presumably be in the future.
    First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842)
    Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1881)
    Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)
    War in Afghanistan (2001–present) – ISAF/NATO involvement

    Geoff.

    in reply to: What have we acheived in Iraq and Afghanistan? #1873132
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    The excuse used was WMD initially and that we would help them achieve democracy and judging by the on going fighting between the different sects in both country’s we have not achieved this. In all the wars the British have fought in Iraq on the following occasions with varied success and reasons for doing so.
    Mesopotamian campaign (1914–1918)
    Anglo-Iraqi War (1941)
    Gulf War (1990-1991)
    Iraqi no-fly zones conflict (1991–2003)
    Iraq War (2003–2011)
    The same can be said of Afghanistan for the same above so we have had a varied series of campaigns and history of resentment that has built up in both country’s for generations,what surprised me were the amount of other country’s who have also fought in both country’s so it seems that for what ever reason Afghanistan is prime territory from the first to the present and will presumably be in the future.
    First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842)
    Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1881)
    Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)
    War in Afghanistan (2001–present) – ISAF/NATO involvement

    Geoff.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #984711
    1batfastard
    Participant

    To it’s Son :highly_amused:
    http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTuAibKKzDNAaBZZwfi7g-DP0HgLVs0hrrc8wF7Sbu4Y9BAtQbG

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go? (2013) #984733
    1batfastard
    Participant

    To another Mig that has no bog roll :highly_amused:
    http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTpsHh1IpLx_4q1byXHi1Tm6qTVIlEggt2KbCAnKnEb45pSfj1P1g

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: how to put out a truck fire in canada #984830
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Already posted on the 10th by Skyraider3d in the ‘How Low Can You Go Thread’ :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Vulcan – Now cleared for full aerobatics? #985974
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    I would rather see the Vulcan displaying a mundane routine than thrown all over the sky as for one thing this would prolong the flying career that XH558 has left yes it looks and sounds great but unless they are secretly planning to extend the flying passed 2015 why not accept the Vulcan for what it is the last flying example.
    Just a quick question if they are in the throws of enhancing the flying life for a couple of years would it cost much more to extend that say for another ten years or so and is this a cost or a physical impossibility ?

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #985977
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Bob,DCW & Duxman, Many thanks’ for all the pic’s especially the Blenheim looking good nice to have an Idea of the final colours but looks like well on the path to flying again congratulations to all involved in this truly momentous venture :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #987548
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    From a naked YF-12 to one with a sun tan :highly_amused:
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7jTGeDG5Ntc/T5X8YIi4iDI/AAAAAAAAA2k/OUUArmJ4Nto/s1600/va-yf12a-02-cr-12.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go? (2013) #987566
    1batfastard
    Participant

    To putting a rail fire out
    http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjqgSb2L7YBYZfenG04wZRfhE_ISPfqoP6M89-TDyvfOnk8lwHBAhttp://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQIFmV_CPf8l_GjFGD7BOTTQ4iBgAKYoL2al1_LRg1p0CZ2-5P9

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Gannet airborne #987584
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Chad Veich,
    Many thanks for the vids,Never forget seeing a Gannet being jump started by a Hercules prop wash at a Coventry air display a few years ago but glad to see one back in the air.

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: *new* WB57 flies again… #987618
    1batfastard
    Participant

    ZXR61,
    Many thanks for the post second what Newforest and many thanks for the mission statement Newforest. :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Flying Legends Footage #988743
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    That has to be the quickest 10 mins of my life Exceptionally put together many thanks for the posting :eagerness:

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #988744
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Gerrard here’s some info in this link http://http://www.flickr.com/photos/kemon01/8221005339/
    From 1 to 2 YF-110’S
    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8338/8221005339_6846b0faf8_z.jpg

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: Rise of the 6th Generation Fighter … #2265281
    1batfastard
    Participant

    6th generation should have a small nuclear power plant for unlimited range.

    Hi All,
    Didn’t they abandon the Idea of nuclear fuelled aircraft because of the radiation that would contaminate the air ? http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_X-6

    Geoff.:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #273072
    1batfastard
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Setting aside the religious overtones with the problem could the continued violence /trouble be that those who were involved way back have had all the power taken away and just like nothing better than to appear to be in charge by giving orders on both sides still recruiting with bullsh*t from way back when ?

    Geoff.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,721 through 3,735 (of 4,006 total)