dark light

neilly

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 642 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Large scale drawings #2118776
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Large scale drawings

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 05-01-02 AT 03:06 AM (GMT)]Hi Halibag,
    No there’s no restriction on model size, at least none that I can think of. There are quite a few big models flying, 18 ft seems to be about the favourite maximum wingspan, but there are probably some bigger. There’s a B-29 (I think it’s Dutch owned) which has a hugh wingspan & if memory serves me right 4x 240cc engines- quite a beast!!
    If you need any help just give me a shout & I’ll do what I can.
    Another piccie of my No.1 toy, bit out of date, the nacelles are now complete.

    All the best,
    Neilly
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c366d5c7c15384f.jpg

    in reply to: Large scale drawings #2118820
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Large scale drawings

    Hi All,
    I done dare think about how much it’s cost me so far. I wouldn’t like to put in print in case the wife found out!!! I don’t know dresses fit her wardrobe, but the price of my Mossie would fill several wardrobes! Add to this all the decorating- I’m sweating profusely just thinking about it!

    All the best,
    Neilly

    in reply to: Large scale drawings #2118836
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Large scale drawings

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 03-01-02 AT 09:15 AM (GMT)]Hi Halibag,
    I think you will have some problems to over come, if you’re going to build a big scale model. If the model is over 20kgs then you will need the model to inspected, at regular intervals, so you can get a CAA exemption certificate, which you will need to fly a big model. I’ll give you an eg. of model size to weight- My Mosquito is 1/5th scale, wingspan is just over 10ft, fuz, just over 8ft. the all up weight is going to be just over the 20kg (I can’t build light to save my life!).
    If you do want to press on with this project, then the place to make enquiries is on the LMA web site forum, someone usually knows where to get plans etc. However, the club I’m in built 4 Lancasters, of which only 2 are still flying (I think), so I could probably find a name & telephone number for somebody to help you.
    If I can help drop me a line direct, & I’ll do what I can.
    Below is my No.1 toy.

    All the very best,
    Neilly
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3c34204f3d344e10.jpg

    in reply to: Lancaster for Lancman #2118898
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Lancaster for Lancman

    Hi Halibag,
    Yeah, I understand completely- From one pedantic sod to another!!!

    All the beat,
    Neilly

    in reply to: Lancaster for Lancman #2118915
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Lancaster for Lancman

    No Problem, Lancman, my pleasure.
    Happy New Year to you,

    Neilly

    in reply to: Lancaster for Lancman #2118971
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Lancaster for Lancman

    I wish I did have some pictures of a flying Halifax, that I’d taken in my collection, but unfortuneatly I don’t.
    A few years ago there use to be a large scale model of a Halifax on the LMA model air show circuit. It looked most impressive, they use to display it with a Lancaster. I don’t know what happened to it, I’ll try & find out.

    All the best,
    Neilly

    in reply to: Lancaster for Lancman #2118986
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Lancaster for Lancman

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 31-12-01 AT 07:55 PM (GMT)]Ant, was it really that long ago? Doesn’t time fly (no pun intended) when you’re having fun!!!
    I still have a few more piccies, so I’ll do a Philo, occasionally.

    Best wishes for the New Year,
    Neilly

    in reply to: New Year project……… #2119053
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: New Year project………

    Hi Mick,
    When you get a rudder made up take a picture or 2 of it & put it on the site. As a modeller, myself, it’s always interesting to see other ideas. Keep us posted.

    All the best for the New Year,
    Neilly

    in reply to: New Year project……… #2119071
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: New Year project………

    Excellent idea! I think I would make the whole fin & rudder, because the rudder is usually fairly featureless & the change of colour such as a fin flash/insignia would add a little extra. I think if you were making a reasonable size replica, then mount it on a wooden plaque. If you were going to build them in say 1/5th scale then for example a Mosquito fin & rudder would be just over 16 inches high & a Hawker Tempest V would be just over 18 inches high, you can always scale them up, if this is to small. I have scale drawings for both of these aircraft, that I can copy, if you want.
    Another suggest, for plans, is the Large Model Association. The LMA has a forum, so if you ask there ,then hopefully you should get some help. The web site is http://members.tripod.co.uk/LMASiteUK/ It’s worth looking at just see some of the beautiful models that are displayed every year. They might be models, but they certainly look the part- there are not many places that you would 4 B-17’s flying together!

    Any help that I can give, just let me know.
    Happy New Year,

    Neilly

    in reply to: Best single engined fighter-bomber of WW2? #2119083
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Best fighter bomber

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 28-12-01 AT 09:30 AM (GMT)]Good one Cool Hand. It’s good to see someone whose prepared to argue a case & do some research. If you want the best Mosquito books let me know, I can tell you the ones to look up. I shall look forward to further discussions, as I’m doing some P-38 reading. However, reading, work & building my number 1 toy takes it’s toll of my time. If you went to the The Mosquito Page you may have seen my No.1 toy, in the model section, although it’s about 12 months out of date, I’m hoping to have it flying in the spring (18 mths late).
    Going slightly off- I do have for sale Mosquito by Sharp & Bowyer. This book is the definitive Mosquito book. It’s in mint condition & the reason I’m selling it, is I manage to get hold of a limited, edition, signed copy of this book. Anyone interested let me know.

    Happy New Year, to all,

    Neilly

    in reply to: Best single engined fighter-bomber of WW2? #2119103
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Best fighter bomber

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 26-12-01 AT 10:13 PM (GMT)]Well Cool Hand, I’m not going over old ground, I would just suggest you get some books about the Mosquito out the library, & do some research!!!
    If you want a book to start with, go for The Mosquito Log by Alexander McKee. You’ll find it an interesting read, as it looks at the developement of the Mosquito from the people who designed & flew it.
    Neilly

    in reply to: Best single engined fighter-bomber of WW2? #2119165
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: DH.110 armament

    Sorry to reopen this old ‘un!
    I’ve just received the latest DH Newsletter & they’re celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the DH 110. One of the pictures in the article definitly shows 4 gun ports under the fuselage, similar to the Mosquito set up. So it would seem that at least one DH 110 carried 30mm cannons.

    Neilly

    in reply to: phred's comment #2119177
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: phred’s comment

    In a way I agree with you, Ant. However, it’s good to discuss different aircraft types, the pros & cons of how good certain aeroplanes are or were. The problem, & I’ve said this before, is getting people to say why they think one particular aircraft is better than others. The usual- it climes well! it dives better!! it turns better than!!! etc. with no technical data or evidense doesn’t cut much ice! I’ve tried acting as devil’s advocate to try & get sensible discussions going, but other forum users seem reluctant to do much research on their favourite aircraft etc. & argue their case.
    As I know you usually do some research (well I assume so, from many of your answers), then I think you may understand what I mean. Apologies if this sounds a little presumpious, it’s not meant to be.

    I hope everyone on this forum has a great Christmas & New Year.

    Neilly

    in reply to: Pic Of The Day-20/12/2001 #2119211
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: Pic Of The Day-20/12/2001

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 22-12-01 AT 05:47 PM (GMT)]That picture looks very similar to some that I took at the Stoughton air show quite a few years ago. Spookily – because I don’t have a scanner I gave this picture & several others to my friend to put on disc so that I can put them on the site.
    Neilly

    in reply to: phred's comment #2119214
    neilly
    Participant

    RE: phred’s comment

    Sorry to disagree, the most versatile aircraft of WW2 was the Mosquito, without a shadow of a doubt! I am very biased towards this aeroplane, but you only have to look at it’s list of achievements, it was a superb multi-role aircraft. I have had this arguement before so I’ll draw a line here, unless you wish to take the discussion further (then you can take the blame for me boring the others about the Mosquito!).

    Merry Christmas to ALL
    Neilly

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 642 total)