Thanks for posting. Seeing sharkmouths on some of those types, such as the early Bf109s and Blenhiem, are new to me π
Thanks for posting. I’m looking forward to seeing the Seafire back where it belongs!
Speaking as someone who wasn’t at Farnborough 60, 50, 40, 30 or 20 years ago (remember how lucky you are, people who were!), I am glad to see the Vulcan wherever it flies, and will never find it boring. However its loss from RIAT is no great loss to me, as this particular airshow (IMO) has been getting progressively less and and less good value for money since I first attended it (1997, aged seven.)
There are still plenty of Vulcan-rich airshows this year. People who like the Vulcan-go to them. People who find it passe and dull, go somewhere else.
Want to see the Parnall Elf? Go to Shuttleworth! Personally, I think I’ll do both π
What a super shot!
It seems odd to me that the line of the windows (and therefore presumably the passenger deck) is not only not parallel to the waterline when the aircraft is at rest, but also at quite a slant compared to the panel joints. Presumably this means that the windows are not neatly fitted between two longerons in the internal structure?
Never noticed that about Short flying boats before π
What-returning the Hampden to Lufthansa colours?! :confused:
Some super photos in those links, thanks. I’d not seen the recovery photos before – yeowch! What a mess!
It’s amazing what the team have done with it in the intervening time. Of course much of it is “reconstruction” not restoration, but at the end of the day recreation of the aircraft is definitely the way to go IMO. The end result will be so beautiful and imposing I’m sure it’ll be worth it!
There was a long discussion about this on Britmodeller a while back-the conclusion was that nobody could find any incontrovertible evidence that the Heyfords had been repainted from the NIVO scheme. Yellow has been suggested, but I’ve a feeling nobody on the BM thread had ever seen a picture.
The picture Aeronut posted on the Wellesley thread does seem to show fin flashes with white in, but appears to retain the two-colour roundels. The overall colour is very dark which implies to me that the Heyford (at least in that picture) retains NIVO and original markings, with the fin flashes simply painted on later.
I agree wholly with the points made about maintaining a relevant, not over-crammed collection and the value of tying exhibits together thematically- and in my experience this is something UK aviation museums could often do better. In an ideal world it would be wonderful to see more of the smaller “regional” volunteer-run museums consolidating overflowing and eclectic collections into a locally relevant (or at least thematically consistent) “story”, through which visitors can move with a sense of logical progression, admiring beautifully-kept exhibits in airy surroundings free from clutter. One of the things I find most tiring in a museum or collection is being overwhelmed by a great mass of material, often crammed into every available corner with each object not really relating intuitively to the next.
Of course, in practice space and money are limited, and if a new building is commissioned, understandably the owners try and cram as many exhibits into it as possible, to protect them and make the best use of their precious space. While it would be lovely to see many small museums more like my vision above, it’s impossible to blame them for the difficulties of trying to protect and show a collection which is too large for the available space. Bequeathed items may have been given in good faith even if not always of a consistent quality or relevance to the remit, and it’s easy to sympathise with a curator trying to respect the wishes of the original owners by displaying them. The “treasure trove” atmosphere can also be very appealing in smaller museums-and of course it’s a matter of balance between cluttered and empty.
One such example which, to me, seems to use space with rather uneven success is the Norfolk and Suffolk museum at Flixton. Before someone accuses me of being unduly harsh, I should point out that I loved this museum when I visited last year on an event day, and found a treasure trove of wonderful artefacts, friendly staff and plenty of interested visitors. However it clearly suffers from a chronic shortage of space (or a surfeit of exhibits) which led to hangars being crammed to the brim-not just with aircraft-but with recovered wreckage, models, text to read, artefacts and other paraphernalia. I undoubtedly missed interesting things in the mass of exhibits, and it was a particular shame that one of the most significant aircraft (the Vickers Valletta) was slowly corroding outside for lack of hangar space. Amongst all of this, there were still some wonderful things, such as an excellent display of Air Sea Rescue equipment, autogiros designed by the late President (Ken Wallis), and the Lightning development aircraft.
Outside of aviation, some of the best museums I have been to are on the continent, particularly in Scandinavia. The Viking Ship Museum in Oslo is a pre-eminent example-stunning exhibits (both huge and tiny) housed with plenty of space to admire them in a breathtaking, if simple building. Well worth a visit!
I’m sure it’s already been repeated elsewhere-but I imagine there wouldn’t be much of a market for Sabres to offset the the fantastic cost of building them from scratch. Unless the finished product could be made sufficiently reliable to tempt the US air racing industry? *dreams of preposterous Sabre-engined P-51 screaming round the circuit at Reno*
Graham-I presume you mean “unarmed” not “unmanned?”? π
Am I right in recalling that the Messenger was the result of a very “unofficial” specification from certain Army officers, and subsequently ordered without Air Min approval? I also seem to remember that the Air Min were understandably upset, but eventually ordered the Messenger formally due to its manifest qualities as a STOL VIP transport.
Crass Repetition of Aviatrix Bullsh*t Sensationalisms?
Cannibalism Really Ainβt a Believable Scenario…
I love how the article described the crabs as “carnivorous” in the same sentence as mentioning than they use their large claws to crack open coconuts.
Nice shots, thanks Robert. The BOAC Lodestar and He-111 in particular are beautiful!
Some more great pics, thanks everyone!
PV202 is a great improvement on the pseudo-Battle of Britain scheme-now we have four airworthy Mk. 1s it’s nice to see it back in something a bit more representative!
MH434’s stripes are perfect right down to the slightly wobbly edges! Love it!