dark light

Tin Triangle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,108 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What will be the show stoppers for 2013? #984220
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    For me it has to be the Fury, although Hurricane P2902, Gladiator N5903, Canberra XH134 and Comet G-ACSS are definitely contenders.

    in reply to: Typhoon/Tempest cockpit sections #986409
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    There’s a Typhoon section of similar size in the upstairs gallery of Airspace at Duxford. I think the Jet Age Museum have one as the basis for a project as well.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #987029
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Great pictures as ever. Can’t help wishing that Firefly would get pushed further up the “things to do” list. Just imagine it powering down the flightline in Pacific colours!

    in reply to: Sunderland over Farnborough #987300
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    There was, I recall, one operated under a UK civil registration until about 1995-6, when it went to the USA to join Fantasy of Flight owned by Kermit Weeks. I don’t think it’s flown since, sadly.
    It was probably that which you saw.

    EDIT G-BJHS, this one:
    http://www.fantasyofflight.com/aircraftpages/sunderland.htm

    in reply to: If the Flypast Forum folded, where would you go to? #995005
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Britmodeller, mostly!
    I’d certainly have to start taking Flypast again: I gave it up to save my student pennies, because I started to get all my news via here much more immediately and quickly. I now chiefly buy the odd issue with a particularly interesting article.
    I think the nicest thing here is the sheer range of people posting: in this one thread you have posts from people active in the restoration and preservation scene, interested amateurs like me, and a Battle of Britain veteran of immense and fascinating experience.
    It does occasionally get nasty, sure, and certain people seem to join with the sole intention of making it so (I’m sure everyone can remember a recent example!). However, the mods do a tireless job in keeping things civil, and despite much debate, banter and disagreement there is still much genuine exchange of knowledge and help here.
    Long may it continue!
    Phil

    in reply to: The Restoration of I.V.L. Haukka "HA-39" #999384
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    What an interesting project, thanks for posting!

    in reply to: Survey #937290
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    “Reserves?”
    “None, they’re all up”.
    “…That’s…what I’ve just told the Prime Minister”.

    in reply to: N3200-underside colours? #938921
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Thanks all!

    in reply to: RAF Museum large aircraft hangar #939656
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    To me, the relative lengths of military/civil service aren’t so important as the quite different stories the two airframes tell. The Lyneham machine perfectly represents the military role of the Comet as the RAF’s first jet transport, and has an interesting story to tell about the slow decline of the British Empire, and the legacy of having to fly UK armed forces rapidly out to trouble spots.

    G-APAS, on the other hand, is the last surviving complete Comet I and therefore I believe the oldest jet airliner surviving. To me its story is more about the astonishing technological leap Britain made in the immediate post-war period; the brief, world-leading career of the Comets in the early 1950s, and the terrible cost Britain paid for leading the way into unknown technological territory.
    Doesn’t South Kensington have remnant sections of G-ALYP from the Mediterranean crash? I can’t help thinking that if they could display G-APAS somewhere, fully re-painted up and polished like the early BOAC aircraft, it would be a much more appropriate home than Cosford.

    Oh well, we can dream…

    in reply to: RAF Museum large aircraft hangar #940613
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Well, that sounds like a hangar full already! It’s most encouraging news that they’re planning to build something for the VC10 etc.
    I think it’d be good to reorganise the Transport and Training hangar to be Maritime and Training, and use the new hangar to concentrate on Transport. So in the old hangar you’d have Varsity, Nimrod, Neptune, Anson, Bulldog, Provost, Chipmunk etc etc and other small stuff, and the new one would have VC-10, Herc, Britannia, Comet, Argosy and Andover. I’d also like to see the Valetta out of storage and in that mix!

    EDIT: I’m really not sure what they’ll do with the two Comets seeming as they’re going to recieve the Lyneham aircraft XK699. Perosnally, I think it would be wonderfuly if room could be made for a gloriously polished G-APAS at the Science Museum in time for the 60th anniversary of the Comet’s first flight. Then RAFM would be left with a genuine RAF Comet with excellent provenance for the new hangar.

    in reply to: Hucks starting Canadian Hawker Hind #943045
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Awesome, I had no idea the Canadian Hind was capable of running. Thanks for posting!

    in reply to: Boeing B-17 & B-29's equipped with JB-2 cruise missiles #958051
    Tin Triangle
    Participant
    in reply to: Peter Vallance #958621
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Very sad, RIP. 🙁

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #974200
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    Interesting that the TFC engineers have removed the fillet at the base of MV268’s fin as part of maintenance. Does it conceal some important access point or structural member that needs checking?

    Thanks as always to the contributors to this thread. I neglected to add my appreciation to the 2012 one, but it’s very much a lifeline to those who can’t get to DX as much as they’d like!

    in reply to: Dambuster Lancaster model photos #982847
    Tin Triangle
    Participant

    I’m surprised nobody has commented on the half-finished Wellington in the first shot… :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,108 total)