dark light

Spiteful

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 178 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1282892
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Beat me too it! 🙂

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1282902
    Spiteful
    Participant

    ah yes the 47! 🙂

    It would be nice to see a VI and VII available but unfortunately only a single VII survives, unless anyone knows of any others?

    Would also be nice to see a 21 in the flying line up. There are a few of them around – does anyone know if there are any plans to try to get some ‘air’ under one of them in the future?

    in reply to: Booker Spitfire Mk.1 AR213 G-AIST (merged) #1282922
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Well done to all involved – she looks great! Will we see her with the bounce markings on?

    so of the airworthy spits we now have a I, II, V, VIII, IX, XI, XIV,XVI,XVIII and XIX, with a mk XXII waiting in the wings and also a swedish IV project if i’m correct!!!

    Is there any other marks of spit which are intended to be put back into the skies?

    Don’t forget the Seafire XVII…

    Hopefully we still have a Spitfire XII, Seafire’s II(?), III, XV, 46 to see – maybe be one day. What a fantastic line up that would be, all in Mk number order… 🙂

    in reply to: BBMF Spitfire MK356 update #1290925
    Spiteful
    Participant

    The Dutch Spit is owned by the Dutch Airforce and operated by the Dutch Royal Airforce Historical flight.
    She shot down the first aircraft during D-day.
    Restored in the early 90’s by the Dutch Spitfire Flight.

    I thought it was ML407 that claimed the first aircraft on D-day?

    in reply to: High altitude Spitfire? #1243100
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Picture of her at the following link:

    http://www.militaryairshows.net/spits/ba10p01s06.jpg

    in reply to: Mirror, mirror on the wall ……………….. #1295419
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Another Comet…

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v260/coopersean/Black20Magic.jpg

    in reply to: SPITFIRE Tr #1326954
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Thanks Mark 12

    in reply to: SPITFIRE Tr #1327513
    Spiteful
    Participant

    http://pacificcoast.net/~zoman/iac.html

    Looking at the above site, it states IAC160 was lost. Is there any more details of the event? Did the crew get out, and is her location known?

    Also, apart from ML417, all the other Indian Tr 9s seem to have been scrapped. Can anyone confirm this, or could one be out there still?

    Thanks

    in reply to: RJ Mitchell RR #1243878
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Thanks Stuart.

    Checked the DVLa website, and none of the three are still registered…they mave have changed plates I suppose if they are still around?

    in reply to: RJ Mitchell RR #1243955
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Thanks Mark 12. could well be. I remember reading somewhere it was a RR, but that may not have been correct then.

    Either way, can anyone confirm what car Mitchell owned and if it is still around?

    in reply to: SPITFIRE Tr #1244621
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Seems to confirm they had 2 T9’s

    So does that make the offical number 21 Tr9’s now.

    Next question is what was its original serial number?

    in reply to: Any 5? #1245169
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Hmm…difficult!

    1) Spiteful
    2) DH Hornet
    3) Macchi 205V
    4) Spitfire (not fussy, but a Mk XII, or K5054 herself would be nice!)
    5) ME190F

    in reply to: SPITFIRE Tr #1247714
    Spiteful
    Participant

    In Aeroplane this month, on pg 20, there is an interesting section on another potential Tr9 – G-15-75. Are you sure it is not this one rather than G-15-79 that your thinking about?

    ML417 has certainly been converted back to single seat configuration. I believe some of it’s TR9 parts were used in the recent American 2 seater that has just flow (MH367?)

    in reply to: Spitfire PRIV #1306290
    Spiteful
    Participant

    Thanks Paul – obvious now you point it out!

    🙂

    in reply to: Spitfire PR XIX at 51,000 ft? #1316801
    Spiteful
    Participant

    I remember the Article – sure it was in Aeroplane, must be 15 years ago at least. Detailed the story and had a dramtic picture of the aircraft in the subsequent high speed dive. I believe the article was written by or contributed by Flt Lt Powles.

    The aircraft was PS852, and the flight was on the 5th Feb 1952 from Kai Tak. Apparently after completing his meteorological task, he decided to see how high his aircraft could go. He reached a height in excess of 51000 ft, then I believe had a problem with the pressurisation system which caused him to decend rapidly – I recall from the Aeroplane article a decent figure of 49000 feet in a minute, in which he reached about Mach 0.94. He recovered from the dive and landed safely.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 178 total)