Well, there’s a old saying that if u have a weak power then u need a superior aerodynamic design to compensate the weakness. Yet we see CAC features another unconventional design. Probably to cut every onus of weight, so range could be longer. Anyway, endurance is all abt a scouting UAV

A clearer picture:

I decide not to feed the troll by the monster which posted his pic in # 83 😀

Anyway, it’s like before, time will prove. And time has proved many. The J16 is around the corner awaiting its first flight soon. It will not disappear by any monster’s yelling & ranting.

what are you talking about? what does your moment in gloating have to do with Su-35S and J-11B.. or even J-15!?

Don’t get too smart by copycating my used tactic for answering u last time.

If the concern is credibility, then my last post was answering it. There’s no public info on Chinese military aviation currently under development. It’s a long consensus of this board. Take it or leave as all it takes. Only newbie or slowmo don’t know I guess.

J15 is a more logic comparison to su35s. Both still more or less a flanker aerodynamic design, both are abt to enter service. Both feature phased arrary radar. Like J10b is a further improvement from J10a , J15 is an enhancement of J11b in terms of avionics & radar.

J16 is less like flanker than PAk-FA does.

bgnewf’s comments weren’t really related to the question either but you still answered it :diablo:

now quit changing subjects, is the J-15 part of this license or not. and yes the J-15 is mentioned in the first post now, just for you.

Lol, how shameless behavior by editting and changing. :rolleyes:

Even the J15, per deputy head of the Russian Federal Military-Technical Cooperation Service, it’s “neither confirm, nor deny”, which standing actually gives freehand to SAC for further developing. beause it had made it clear: the Russian Authority will stand out only when SAC violate IP rights. if you don’t see Russian Authority says a word: means evrything ongoing is perfectly within IP agreement.

mate, i had dedated all those stuff when flogger/Mig-23MLD /Star 49 era. when you probably was still Hamburger or something, yet to be evolved to “hotdog”

One is the original article and the other is a gross violation and outright theft of intellectual property rights.

We have constantly observed your outright bashing of everything Chinese without due backup of your accusation. I would say it’s “It was a NO display of trained and disciplined valour”, An insult to your own good words displayed in your own signature?

Russia has no questions to China about “copying” military equipment

FARNBOROUGH. July 19 2010 (Interfax-AVN) – China is using Russian and Soviet know-how to develop and build aircraft, Alexander Fomin, first deputy head of the Federal Military-Technical Cooperation Service, said at a news conference at the Farnborough air show.

“It is an accomplished fact. China is vigorously developing its defense industry, not without Russia’s assistance, of course,” he said.

The Soviet Union built about 3,000 enterprises, while Russia handed China licenses to make aircraft and components,” he said.

“We handed over a large amount of know-how to China, including information related to the defense industry. It is not surprising that it repeats itself in Chinese products,” he said.
Asked whether China has developed a fighter jet which it claims excels Russia’s Sukhoi Su-33, Fomin said, “I can neither confirm, nor deny this.”

“Concerning the Su-33, Russia did not deliver such planes to China. If our Chinese partners have them, they were not received from Russian sources,” he said.

Fomin said Russia has no questions to China so far. “We have an agreement on the protection of intellectual property rights. If we uncover copyright violations, we will deal with this within the framework of the agreement,” Fomin said.

sd dp

(Our editorial staff can be reached at [email]eng.editors@interfax.ru[/email])

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=98077&page=9

Actually after April, the J20 flew more than dozen times in mere two months time.
We can’t rule out there are maybe more than one prototype in flight test.