Exotic? well, none, really (at least, not to me, have a look and see what you think)…
Full list being
British Airways
Balair (on behalf of Swissair)
Swissair
Crossair
US Airways (although the aircraft was still in US Air livery)
United
British Midland (pre bmi days)
Air Frog (sorry, Air France)
dat (on behalf of Sabena)
Swiss
BACX (on behalf of BA)
Well, firstly, Andrew, what an excellent registration. And I’m sure that skycruiser mentioned last year shortly before the UEFA Cup final that he’d just flown it a couple of days ago from LHR to HKG, so, yes, he has flown it at least once.
maybe that explains Sandy Clark talking p1sh most of the time, then? 😉
here are my two latest arrivals…
(will post a pic of the whole fleet later when I get a chance…)

victory cigars are always sweet…
they levelled it
ah, well, you can read German, then… well, here’s my translation of the article for thsoe who can’t, anyway…
After the Collapse of Swiss’ planned joining of the oneworld Airline alliance, there are currently no talks with alternative partners. That’s Swiss’ Board Room President [I think that’s to say the Chairman] Pieter Bouw’s take on it on Thursday. An Alliance ‘isn’t a necessity to [Swiss’] survival’, as Bouw told the Press.
Swiss had previously announced that they would be passing up on the chance to join oneworld, as they hadn’t been able to reach an agreement with oneworld leader British Airways about the integration of their frequent flyer programs. The substantial costs and disadvantages hadn’t been enough to outweigh the medium and long-term advantages, as Bouw explained the decision. He regrets the development, but the price of joining oneworld under the existing parameters was too high.
Swiss would have had to give up the database of their Swiss Travel Club frequent flyer program. Swiss, however, didn’t want to sacrifice their ‘best asset’. Bouw went on to say that the consequences of the integration of the frequent flyer programs hadn’t been foreseeable when their joining of the alliance had been announced in Autumn 2003.
Changed situation
Swiss retains their total operational and strategical independence. The Company is in better shape than in last autumn, according to Bouw. The Market is slowly recovering, and the liquidity of the company is better than expected. Bilateral agreements with most oneworld members would remain in place. Unaffected by the decision was the transferral of 8 pairs of slots at Heathrow Airport in London to British Airways.
Five of these 8 Slots are a deposit on a credit of 50 Million Swiss Franks [some 40 Million Dollars/22 Million Pounds/33 Million Euros] that Swiss had taken out in February this year. The loss of these slots will have negative financial implications. Other costs for the failed membership drive were termed at 5 Million Franks.
No talks with others
Negotiations for a new agreement were not currently taking place, said Bouw. Nor are any discussions with the German Lufthansa being held. Before Swiss announced their aim to join oneworld last autumn, they’d been conducting talks with Lufthansa about a takeover.
When former Lufthansa-Manager Christoph Franz took over at the top of Swiss [about two months ago, as CEO], and the stalling of the talks with British Airways became obvious, there was increased speculation about a deal with Lufthansa again. Franz was involved in the decision to exit oneworld, Bouw confirmed.
Swiss is currently working at strengthening their financial situation and the implication of a turnaround plan, continued Bouw. A Share issue wasn’t excluded by him, they wanted to keep all their options open.
http://www.BaZ.ch © by Basler Zeitung
didn’t know about LH taking out a loan, hmm, the plot thickens…
um, well, if your German is good enough, and you can read that newspaper article I posted, no. oneworld are supposedly still there ‘preferred’ alliance partner… but, well, we’ll see…
I’ll sit down and work on a translation of that article, might take a while, though…
yup. and all 10 will be ex-ZRH… and they’ll lose the codeshare to GVA in three years, as things stand, too
if you go to book on the LX website, for a flight BSL-LHR next April, it says ‘operated by BA, operates to LHR Terminal 1’.
Similarly, the BA website lists flights LHR-BSL from next April as BA flight numbers (BA75x ) as opposed to the codeshare flight number it is now (BA674x), although BA says the flights will operate to/from LHR Terminal 4…
Sandy drives a 406… 😉
If they have, it’s one hell of a price to pay…
here’s a full list of flights between London and Switzerland for next Winter, as things currently stand…
BSL-LHR (SWISS 3* daily)
BSL -STN (easyJet 1* daily)
GVA-LCY (BACX 3* daily)
GVA-LGW (BA 3* daily)
GVA-LGW (easyJet 2* daily)
GVA-LHR (BA (LX codeshare) 8* daily)
GVA-LTN (easyJet 3* daily)
ZRH-LCY (SWISS 4* daily)
ZRH-LGW (BA 2* daily)
ZRH-LHR (SWISS 6* daily)
ZRH-LHR (BA 6* daily)
ZRH-LTN (easyJet 3* daily)
as you can see, LX have lost out majorly on the should-be cash cow London market, specially with BA taking over the BSL-LHR flights in March 2005…
And Chariman Pieter Bouw says no talks have been held with LH since… (you speak german, Sandy… I can’t be bothered translating this just now http://www.baz.ch/news/index.cfm?ObjectID=E8E9B74D-60CF-2062-F415970A0F11F907)
and especially those French Car builders…
yeah, I got a text from Ren, they got up to GLA, logged the CO and US departures, then got stopped by the Police who were being extra vigilant because Charlie and Camilla Parker Bowles are up in Glasgow today, and the Royal Flight’s BAe146 is standing about at GLA…
Probably not the best of days to be hanging around the perimiter fence, really… 🙁
not any more he dsoen’t…